Gutschow Christian A, Hamoir Marc, Rombaux Philippe, Otte Jean-Bernard, Goncette Louis, Collard Jean-Marie
Unit of Upper G-I Surgery, Louvain Medical School, Brussels, Belgium.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Nov;74(5):1677-82; discussion 1682-3. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03931-0.
Incomplete symptomatic relief of pharyngoesophageal (Zenker's) diverticulum after endoscopic stapling or laser division has been reported by some authors. The clinical relevance of cricomyotomy, although supported by experimental data, remains controversial.
Operative procedures consisted of transcervical resection (n = 34, group I), transcervical resection plus cricomyotomy (n = 12, group II), transcervical cricomyotomy (n = 8, group III), transcervical cricomyotomy plus diverticulopexy (n = 47, group IV), endoscopic stapling division (n = 31, group V), and endoscopic laser division (n = 55; group VI).
The percentage of totally asymptomatic patients was significantly (p < 0.004) higher after open procedures (combined groups I to IV) than after endoscopic treatment (combined groups V and VI) regardless of the size of the pouch (< 3 cm, 85% versus 25%; > or = 3 cm, 86% versus 50%). The percentage of patients with no or occasional (ie, fewer than twice a week) symptoms was significantly (p < 0.001) higher after open procedures (98%) than after endoscopic treatment (57%) for less than 3-cm diverticula whereas it was not higher (p = 0.409) for 3-cm or greater pouches (open, 97%; endoscopic, 88%). Furthermore, this percentage was similar (p > 0.286) after endoscopic stapling division and after endoscopic laser division (< 3 cm, 50% versus 58%; > or = 3 cm, 96% versus 80%). It was also similar (p > 0.197) after resection alone (group I) and after open operations including myotomy (combined groups II to IV) (< 3 cm, 100% versus 98%; > or = 3 cm, 92% versus 100%). Unlike endoscopic stapling and division, laser division was complicated by mediastinitis (2 patients), and 1 patient was referred because of cervical esophageal disruption during laser division. Five of six postoperative fistulas after resection occurred in patients who did not have myotomy, and 4 patients were referred 12 to 49 years after resection without myotomy for true recurrence of the pouch.
Open techniques afford better symptomatic relief than endoscopic techniques, especially in patients with small diverticula. Endoscopic stapling and division is safer than laser division. Although very effective at midterm, resection without myotomy predisposes to the development of postoperative fistula and to recurrence of the pouch after many years.
一些作者报告称,在内镜下吻合器缝合或激光切开术后,咽食管(Zenker 氏)憩室的症状缓解不完全。环甲膜切开术的临床相关性虽然有实验数据支持,但仍存在争议。
手术方式包括经颈切除术(n = 34,第一组)、经颈切除术加环甲膜切开术(n = 12,第二组)、经颈环甲膜切开术(n = 8,第三组)、经颈环甲膜切开术加憩室固定术(n = 47,第四组)、内镜下吻合器切开术(n = 31,第五组)和内镜下激光切开术(n = 55,第六组)。
无论憩室大小如何(< 3 cm,85% 对 25%;≥ 3 cm,86% 对 50%),开放手术(第一组至第四组合并)后完全无症状患者的百分比显著高于内镜治疗(第五组和第六组合并)(p < 0.004)。对于小于 3 cm 的憩室,开放手术后无或偶尔(即每周少于两次)出现症状的患者百分比显著高于内镜治疗(98% 对 57%,p < 0.001),而对于 3 cm 或更大的憩室则并非如此(p = 0.409)(开放手术,97%;内镜治疗,88%)。此外,内镜下吻合器切开术和内镜下激光切开术后该百分比相似(p > 0.286)(< 3 cm,50% 对 58%;≥ 3 cm,96% 对 80%)。单独切除术后(第一组)和包括肌切开术的开放手术后(第二组至第四组合并)该百分比也相似(p > 0.197)(< 3 cm,100% 对 98%;≥ 3 cm,92% 对 100%)。与内镜下吻合器切开术不同,激光切开术并发纵隔炎(2 例患者),1 例患者因激光切开术中颈段食管破裂而转诊。切除术后六例术后瘘管中有五例发生在未进行肌切开术的患者中,4 例患者在未进行肌切开术的切除术后 12 至 49 年因憩室真正复发而转诊。
开放技术比内镜技术能更好地缓解症状,尤其是在小憩室患者中。内镜下吻合器切开术比激光切开术更安全。虽然中期非常有效,但未进行肌切开术的切除术易导致术后瘘管形成和多年后憩室复发。