Suppr超能文献

短期启动中来源混淆与折扣的机制2:启动刺激相似性和目标持续时间的影响

Mechanisms of source confusion and discounting in short-term priming 2: effects of prime similarity and target duration.

作者信息

Huber David E, Shiffrin Richard M, Lyle Keith B, Quach Raushanna

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Colorado at Boulder, 80309-0345, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Nov;28(6):1120-36.

Abstract

D. E. Huber, R. M. Shiffrin, K. B. Lyle, and K. I. Ruys (2001) tested two-alternative, forced-choice (2-AFC) perceptual identification in a short-term priming task. For repetition priming, passive viewing of primes resulted in a preference to choose repeated words, but actively responding to primes resulted in a preference against choosing repeated words. These results were explained with a computational model, responding optimally with unknown sources of evidence (ROUSE), using the offsetting mechanisms of source confusion and discounting. An analysis of ROUSE revealed conditions under which discounting efficacy should diminish, causing a preference for primed words even with active prime processing. Two new studies confirm 2 such conditions: very short target flash durations and very low similarity between primes and primed choice words. These a priori predictions contrast with the a posteriori data fits of a multinomial model developed by R. Ratcliff and G. McKoon (2001).

摘要

D. E. 休伯、R. M. 希夫林、K. B. 莱尔和K. I. 鲁伊斯(2001年)在一项短期启动任务中测试了二选一、强制选择(2-AFC)的知觉识别。对于重复启动,被动观看启动刺激会导致倾向于选择重复的单词,但对启动刺激做出主动反应则会导致倾向于不选择重复的单词。这些结果用一个计算模型进行了解释,即使用源混淆和折扣的抵消机制,对未知证据源进行最优反应(ROUSE)。对ROUSE的分析揭示了折扣效力应该减弱的条件,即使在对启动刺激进行主动处理的情况下,也会导致对启动单词的偏好。两项新的研究证实了2个这样的条件:目标闪光持续时间非常短,以及启动刺激与启动选择单词之间的相似度非常低。这些先验预测与R. 拉特克利夫和G. 麦昆(2001年)开发的多项式模型的后验数据拟合形成对比。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验