• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者的信息需求:一项全国性调查的结果

Consumer's information needs: results of a national survey.

作者信息

Isaacs S L

机构信息

Center for Health and Social Policy, Pelham, NY, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 1996 Winter;15(4):31-41. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.15.4.31.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.15.4.31
PMID:8991252
Abstract

A national survey conducted in 1995 found that a disturbingly high percentage of Americans do not understand the basic elements of health plans and that people want much more information, particularly about the physicians in the plans and the range of services that are covered. Their most important concern when selecting a health plan is the quality of physicians in the plan, followed by the courtesy of doctors and staff and the freedom to choose their own doctors and hospitals.

摘要

1995年进行的一项全国性调查发现,高得令人不安的比例的美国人不理解健康保险计划的基本要素,而且人们想要更多信息,尤其是关于保险计划中的医生以及所涵盖的服务范围。他们在选择健康保险计划时最重要的考虑因素是保险计划中医生的质量,其次是医生和工作人员的礼貌以及选择自己医生和医院的自由。

相似文献

1
Consumer's information needs: results of a national survey.消费者的信息需求:一项全国性调查的结果
Health Aff (Millwood). 1996 Winter;15(4):31-41. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.15.4.31.
2
What information do consumers want and need?消费者想要和需要哪些信息?
Health Aff (Millwood). 1996 Winter;15(4):42-56. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.15.4.42.
3
Comparison of performance of traditional Medicare vs Medicare managed care.传统医疗保险与管理式医疗保险绩效比较。
JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1744-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1744.
4
Consumer perspectives on information needs for health plan choice.消费者对健康计划选择信息需求的看法。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1996 Fall;18(1):55-73.
5
Physicians contracting with managed care, Medicare, and Medicaid.与管理式医疗、医疗保险和医疗补助计划签约的医生。
Health Mark Q. 1996;14(1):35-48. doi: 10.1300/J026v14n01_04.
6
Differences in the structure of CAHPS measures among the medicare fee-for-service, medicare managed care, and privately insured populations.医疗保险按服务收费人群、医疗保险管理式医疗人群和私人保险人群中CAHPS测评结构的差异。
Health Serv Res. 2001 Jul;36(3):489-508.
7
Family members and friends who help beneficiaries make health decisions.帮助受益人做出医疗决策的家庭成员和朋友。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2001 Fall;23(1):105-21.
8
Similarities and differences in choosing health plans.选择健康保险计划的异同。
Med Care. 2002 Apr;40(4):289-302. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200204000-00005.
9
Capitation begins to transform the face of American medicine.按人头付费开始改变美国医学的面貌。
CMAJ. 1996 Mar 1;154(5):688-91.
10
The effect of practitioner compensation on HMO consumer satisfaction.从业者薪酬对健康维护组织消费者满意度的影响。
Manag Care. 2002 Apr;11(4):49-52.

引用本文的文献

1
Health insurance literacy in the Netherlands: The translation and validation of the United States' Health Insurance Literacy Measure (HILM).荷兰的健康保险素养:美国健康保险素养衡量工具(HILM)的翻译与验证。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 1;17(9):e0273996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273996. eCollection 2022.
2
Health Insurance Ad Messages Targeted to English- and Spanish-Speaking Populations in a Period of Limited Federal Investment in Marketplace Outreach.在联邦政府对市场推广投入有限的时期,针对英语和西班牙语受众的健康保险广告信息。
Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Dec;79(6):798-810. doi: 10.1177/10775587221101295. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
3
Informed Decision-making for Health Insurance Enrollment: Survey Study.
健康保险参保的知情决策:调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Aug 12;5(8):e27477. doi: 10.2196/27477.
4
Trusting Sources of Information on Quality of Physician Care.信任医生医疗质量信息源。
Inquiry. 2020 Jan-Dec;57:46958020952912. doi: 10.1177/0046958020952912.
5
Information Expensiveness Perceived by Vietnamese Patients with Respect to Healthcare Provider's Choice.越南患者在选择医疗服务提供者时所感知到的信息成本。
Acta Inform Med. 2016 Oct;24(5):360-363. doi: 10.5455/aim.2016.24.360-363. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
6
A proposed 'health literate care model' would constitute a systems approach to improving patients' engagement in care.提出的“健康素养护理模式”将构成一种改善患者参与护理的系统方法。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):357-67. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1205.
7
A field experiment on the impact of physician-level performance data on consumers' choice of physician.关于医师层级绩效数据对消费者选择医师影响的现场试验。
Med Care. 2012 Nov;50 Suppl(Suppl):S65-73. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31826b1049.
8
[What information do people needing care and their care-giving relatives need?].[需要护理的人及其护理亲属需要哪些信息?]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2011 Apr;44(2):109-14. doi: 10.1007/s00391-010-0146-1. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
9
Demand-driven care and hospital choice. Dutch health policy toward demand-driven care: results from a survey into hospital choice.需求驱动型医疗服务和医院选择。荷兰需求驱动型医疗服务政策:基于医院选择的调查结果。
Health Care Anal. 2009 Mar;17(1):20-35. doi: 10.1007/s10728-008-0093-9. Epub 2008 Jul 19.
10
Providing patients web-based data to inform physician choice: if you build it, will they come?向患者提供基于网络的数据以指导医生选择:如果你构建了它,他们会来吗?
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Oct;22(10):1463-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0278-1. Epub 2007 Jul 26.