Caukwell S, Joels L A, Kyle P M, Mills M S
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Michael's Hospital, Bristol, UK.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 Sep;22(5):486-8. doi: 10.1080/0144361021000003591.
Current advice on the management of breech presentation at term is that all uncomplicated cases should be offered external cephalic version (ECV) or an elective caesarean section. Clinical experience suggests that ECV is currently not offered as widely as advised and that the majority are delivered electively by caesarean section. We present the results of a patient attitude survey of term breech deliveries in a university teaching hospital over 12 months. The results show that half of respondents were not offered ECV and that two-thirds of these women were not eligible for ECV, either having had a previous caesarean or breech presentation diagnosed in labour. One-third of women, potentially suitable for ECV, were not made aware of their options. The majority are offered elective caesarean section with a small minority (10%) opting for planned vaginal breech delivery.
目前对于足月臀位分娩的处理建议是,所有无并发症的病例都应接受外倒转术(ECV)或择期剖宫产。临床经验表明,目前外倒转术的应用并不像建议的那样广泛,大多数产妇选择择期剖宫产。我们展示了一家大学教学医院在12个月内对足月臀位分娩患者态度调查的结果。结果显示,一半的受访者未接受外倒转术,其中三分之二的女性不符合外倒转术的条件,要么曾有过剖宫产史,要么在分娩时被诊断为臀位。三分之一可能适合外倒转术的女性未被告知她们的选择。大多数产妇接受择期剖宫产,少数(10%)选择计划中的阴道臀位分娩。