• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学校能发挥作用吗?青少年风险与健康行为的多层次分析。

Can the school make a difference? A multilevel analysis of adolescent risk and health behaviour.

作者信息

Maes Lea, Lievens John

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University Hospital, Ghent University, Block A, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Gent, Belgium.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2003 Feb;56(3):517-29. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00052-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00052-7
PMID:12570971
Abstract

The main aim of this article is to assess the relationship between the structural and (health) policy variables of the school and characteristics of the individual on the risk and health behaviour of adolescents. Individual and school level effects on seven health-related behaviours are simultaneously estimated, using multilevel modelling. The data are from the Flemish health behaviour in school-aged children study in Belgium. Data are used from 29 Flemish schools in which students (N=3225), school administrators (N=29) and teachers (N=1132) were surveyed with anonymous written questions. The analysis confirms previous findings concerning individual level effects. Although differences between schools in risk and health behaviour were found to originate mainly from differences in pupil characteristics, substantial variation between schools remained with regard to regular smoking, drinking habits and tooth brushing after controlling for individual effects. A wide range of school structure and policy variables were taken into account, but only few of them were found to influence the health and risk behaviour of young people. Moreover, the study could not detect an effect of health promotion policy at school. The analysis therefore only partially confirms the hypothesis that the school has an impact on the health behaviour of young people. The findings demonstrate the need for a more thorough examination of the paths by which schools can influence the health behaviour of their pupils.

摘要

本文的主要目的是评估学校的结构和(健康)政策变量与个体特征对青少年风险和健康行为的关系。利用多层次模型同时估计个体和学校层面因素对七种与健康相关行为的影响。数据来自比利时弗拉芒地区学龄儿童健康行为研究。数据取自29所弗拉芒学校,对学生(N = 3225)、学校管理人员(N = 29)和教师(N = 1132)进行了匿名书面问卷调查。分析证实了先前有关个体层面影响的研究结果。虽然发现学校在风险和健康行为方面的差异主要源于学生特征的差异,但在控制个体因素后,学校在经常吸烟、饮酒习惯和刷牙方面仍存在显著差异。考虑了广泛的学校结构和政策变量,但发现其中只有少数变量会影响年轻人的健康和风险行为。此外,该研究未能发现学校健康促进政策的效果。因此,该分析仅部分证实了学校对年轻人健康行为有影响这一假设。研究结果表明,有必要更深入地研究学校影响学生健康行为的途径。

相似文献

1
Can the school make a difference? A multilevel analysis of adolescent risk and health behaviour.学校能发挥作用吗?青少年风险与健康行为的多层次分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Feb;56(3):517-29. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00052-7.
2
School smoking policies and smoking prevalence among adolescents: multilevel analysis of cross-sectional data from Wales.学校吸烟政策与青少年吸烟率:来自威尔士横断面数据的多层次分析
Tob Control. 2001 Jun;10(2):117-23. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.2.117.
3
Health behaviour among adolescents in Denmark: influence of school class and individual risk factors.丹麦青少年的健康行为:班级及个体风险因素的影响
Scand J Public Health. 2006;34(1):32-40. doi: 10.1080/14034940510032158.
4
School Health Promotion Policies and Adolescent Risk Behaviors in Israel: A Multilevel Analysis.以色列的学校健康促进政策与青少年风险行为:一项多层次分析
J Sch Health. 2016 Jun;86(6):435-43. doi: 10.1111/josh.12394.
5
A methodological and substantive review of the evidence that schools cause pupils to smoke.对学校导致学生吸烟这一证据的方法学与实质性综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jun;58(11):2253-65. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.012.
6
The influence of school culture on smoking among pupils.学校文化对学生吸烟行为的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2004 May;58(9):1767-80. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00396-4.
7
More than words? The status and impact of smoking policies in Scottish schools.岂止言语?苏格兰学校吸烟政策的现状与影响。
Health Promot Int. 2002 Mar;17(1):31-41. doi: 10.1093/heapro/17.1.31.
8
A prevention program for multiple health-compromising behaviors in adolescence: baseline results from a cluster randomized controlled trial.一项针对青少年多种危害健康行为的预防计划:一项整群随机对照试验的基线结果
Prev Med. 2015 Feb;71:20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.12.002. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
9
Can school-related factors predict future health behaviour among young adolescents?与学校相关的因素能否预测青少年未来的健康行为?
Public Health. 2002 Jan;116(1):22-9. doi: 10.1038/sj/ph/1900807.
10
School differences in pupil smoking: a consequence of a trade-off between health and education agendas?学校间学生吸烟情况的差异:是健康与教育议程之间权衡的结果吗?
Health Educ Res. 2003 Oct;18(5):580-91. doi: 10.1093/her/cyf049.

引用本文的文献

1
School collective efficacy and gambling: A multilevel study of 11th grade students in Stockholm.学校集体效能与赌博:对斯德哥尔摩11年级学生的多层次研究
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2023 Aug;40(4):327-338. doi: 10.1177/14550725221143174. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
2
Social Support and Perceptions of COVID-19-related Emotional Impact on Mental Health Among Early Adolescents in Appalachia.阿巴拉契亚地区青少年对 COVID-19 相关情绪影响心理健康的社会支持和认知。
J Sch Health. 2023 May;93(5):370-377. doi: 10.1111/josh.13296. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
3
Do School-Level Factors Affect the Health Behaviors of High School Students in Korea?
学校层面因素会影响韩国高中生的健康行为吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 10;19(2):751. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020751.
4
QLF-D: A Contemporary Plaque Control Tool in Children.QLF-D:儿童的一种当代菌斑控制工具。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Jul-Aug;14(4):502-505. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2001.
5
Differences in Adolescents' Alcohol Use and Smoking Behavior between Educational Tracks: Do Popularity Norms Matter?不同教育轨道青少年的饮酒和吸烟行为差异:受欢迎规范重要吗?
J Youth Adolesc. 2021 Sep;50(9):1884-1895. doi: 10.1007/s10964-021-01467-3. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
6
Weight control intentions and mental health among Canadian adolescents: a gender-based analysis of students in the COMPASS study.加拿大青少年的体重控制意愿和心理健康:基于 COMPASS 研究中学生的性别分析。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2021 Apr;41(4):119-130. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.41.4.01.
7
Individual and school-class correlates of youth cannabis use in Sweden: A multilevel study.瑞典青少年大麻使用的个体及班级相关因素:一项多层次研究。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2018 Apr;35(2):131-146. doi: 10.1177/1455072518763426. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
8
Active Breaks: A Pilot and Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Physical Activity Levels in a School Based Intervention in an Italian Primary School.主动休息:一项在意大利小学进行的基于学校干预的身体活动水平有效性评估的试点和可行性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 17;17(12):4351. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124351.
9
School-Based Tobacco Control and Smoking in Adolescents: Evidence from Multilevel Analyses.基于学校的烟草控制与青少年吸烟:来自多层次分析的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 14;17(10):3422. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103422.
10
School factors and student drinking in high schools: a cross-sectional study of school policies and party regulation.学校因素与高中生饮酒行为:对学校政策和派对监管的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 17;20(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8317-5.