Gill Michelle, Green Steven M, Krauss Baruch
Department of Emergency Medicine, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Feb;10(2):175-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00037.x.
A daily part of emergency medicine practice includes assessing patients with altered levels of consciousness (ALOC). The authors hypothesized that a bispectral index monitor (BIS), a processed electroencephalographic monitor traditionally used to monitor patients under anesthesia, would represent an objective quantification of impairment of consciousness. They compared the BIS score with the Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS) in emergency department (ED) patients with ALOC.
The authors performed a convenience sampling of ED adults presenting with ALOC (GCS <or= 14). Patients with abnormal baseline mental status were excluded, as were those who were unable to tolerate the forehead BIS leads. The blinded BIS value was recorded after the treating physician assigned a GCS to the patient. The BIS and GCS measurements were then correlated.
Data were obtained for 38 patients (20 male, 18 female). The median age was 42 years (range 14 to 93 years). Despite being statistically significant (p = 0.0165), the correlation between the GCS and the BIS score was only moderate (Spearman's rho = 0.387) and displayed wide variability. For example, when the GCS was between 3 and 5, the corresponding BIS scores ranged from 47 to 98. When the GCS was between 12 and 14, the corresponding BIS scores ranged from 56 to 98. Receiver operating characteristic curves for BIS at each GCS threshold demonstrated low discriminatory power (areas under the curve range 0.61 to 0.73).
BIS monitoring does not reliably correlate with GCS in ED patients with ALOC, and does not appear to have potential to accurately quantify impairment of consciousness in this setting.
急诊医学实践的日常工作包括对意识水平改变(ALOC)的患者进行评估。作者推测,双谱指数监测仪(BIS),一种传统上用于监测麻醉患者的经处理的脑电图监测仪,将代表意识损害的客观量化指标。他们比较了急诊科(ED)中意识水平改变患者的BIS评分与格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分(GCS)。
作者对出现意识水平改变(GCS≤14)的急诊科成年患者进行了便利抽样。排除基线精神状态异常的患者以及无法耐受前额BIS导联的患者。在治疗医生为患者指定GCS后,记录盲法BIS值。然后将BIS和GCS测量值进行相关性分析。
获得了38例患者的数据(20例男性,18例女性)。中位年龄为42岁(范围14至93岁)。尽管具有统计学意义(p = 0.0165),但GCS与BIS评分之间的相关性仅为中等(Spearman相关系数ρ= 0.387),并且显示出很大的变异性。例如,当GCS在3至5之间时, 相应的BIS评分范围为47至98。当GCS在12至14之间时,相应的BIS评分范围为56至98。每个GCS阈值下BIS的受试者工作特征曲线显示出较低的辨别力(曲线下面积范围为0.61至0.73)。
在意识水平改变的急诊科患者中,BIS监测与GCS之间没有可靠的相关性,并且在这种情况下似乎没有准确量化意识损害的潜力。