• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信任的敌人。

The enemies of trust.

作者信息

Galford Robert, Drapeau Anne Seibold

机构信息

Center for Executive Development, Boston, USA.

出版信息

Harv Bus Rev. 2003 Feb;81(2):88-95, 126.

PMID:12577656
Abstract

Researchers have established that trust is critical to organizational effectiveness. Being trustworthy yourself, however, does not guarantee that you are capable of building trust in an organization. That takes old-fashioned managerial virtues like consistency, clear communication, and a willingness to tackle awkward questions. It also requires a good defense: You must protect trust from its enemies. Any act of bad management erodes trust, so the list of potential enemies is endless. Among the most common enemies of trust, though, are inconsistent messages from top management, inconsistent standards, a willingness to tolerate incompetence or bad behavior, dishonest feedback, a failure to trust others to do good work, a tendency to ignore painful or politically charged situations, consistent corporate underperformance, and rumors. Fending off these enemies must be at the top of every chief executive's agenda. But even with constant vigilance, an organization and its leaders will sometimes lose people's trust. During a crisis, managers should enlist the help of an objective third party--chances are you won't be thinking clearly--and be available physically and emotionally. If you "go dark" in the face of a crisis, employees will worry about the company's survival, about their own capacity to cope, and about your abilities as a leader. And if trust has broken down so badly that your only choice is to start over, you can do so by figuring out exactly how the breach of trust happened, ascertaining the depth and breadth of the loss, owning up to the loss instead of downplaying it, and identifying as precisely as possible the specific changes you must make to rebuild trust.

摘要

研究人员已经确定,信任对组织效能至关重要。然而,自身值得信赖并不保证你有能力在一个组织中建立信任。这需要具备诸如始终如一、清晰沟通以及愿意处理棘手问题等传统的管理美德。这还需要良好的防御措施:你必须保护信任免受其敌人的侵害。任何不良管理行为都会侵蚀信任,所以潜在敌人的名单数不胜数。不过,信任最常见的敌人包括高层管理发出的前后矛盾的信息、不一致的标准、容忍无能或不良行为的意愿、不诚实的反馈、不信任他人能出色完成工作、忽视痛苦或充满政治意味的情况的倾向、公司持续表现不佳以及谣言。抵御这些敌人必须是每位首席执行官议程的首要任务。但即便时刻保持警惕,一个组织及其领导者有时还是会失去人们的信任。在危机期间,管理者应该寻求客观第三方的帮助——因为你很可能无法清晰思考——并且要在身体和情感上随时待命。如果你在危机面前“消失”,员工会担心公司的生存、自己应对危机的能力以及你作为领导者的能力。而且,如果信任已经严重破裂,以至于你唯一的选择是重新开始,那么你可以通过确切弄清楚信任是如何被破坏的、确定损失的深度和广度、承认损失而非淡化它,以及尽可能精确地确定为重建信任必须做出的具体改变来做到这一点。

相似文献

1
The enemies of trust.信任的敌人。
Harv Bus Rev. 2003 Feb;81(2):88-95, 126.
2
A survival guide for leaders.领导者生存指南。
Harv Bus Rev. 2002 Jun;80(6):65-74, 152.
3
A time for growth: an interview with Amgen CEO Kevin Sharer. Interview by Paul Hemp.成长的时代:对安进公司首席执行官凯文·沙雷尔的采访。保罗·亨普采访。
Harv Bus Rev. 2004 Jul-Aug;82(7-8):66-74, 186.
4
The 2003 HBR list. Breakthrough ideas for tomorrow's business agenda.2003年《哈佛商业评论》榜单。明日商业议程的突破性理念。
Harv Bus Rev. 2003 Apr;81(4):92-8, 124.
5
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
6
If you want honesty, break some rules.如果你想要诚实,那就打破一些规则。
Harv Bus Rev. 2002 Apr;80(4):42-7, 124.
7
Managing yourself. Stop overdoing your strengths.管理好自己。不要过度发挥你的优势。
Harv Bus Rev. 2009 Feb;87(2):100-3.
8
How to invest in social capital.如何投资社会资本。
Harv Bus Rev. 2001 Jun;79(6):86-93, 147.
9
Failing by design.设计缺陷导致失败。
Harv Bus Rev. 2011 Apr;89(4):76-83, 137.
10
Leaders and windshields: the art of deflecting essential information.领导者与挡风玻璃:转移关键信息的艺术。
Nurs Econ. 2004 Jul-Aug;22(4):208-10.

引用本文的文献

1
How does QI work? A trust-building framework in African healthcare: primary evidence from Kenya and Malawi.质量改进如何发挥作用?非洲医疗保健中的信任建立框架:来自肯尼亚和马拉维的初步证据。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 May 28;14(2):e003330. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003330.
2
Building Trust in Post-Acute and Long-Term Care: Strategies for Sustainable Change.在急性后期和长期护理中建立信任:可持续变革的策略
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Feb;23(2):193-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.12.007.
3
Trust levels within categories of information and communication technology companies.
信息和通信技术公司类别的信任级别。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 11;16(6):e0252773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252773. eCollection 2021.
4
Leadership Challenges in Academic Anesthesiology.学术麻醉学中的领导力挑战
J Educ Perioper Med. 2005 Jan 1;7(1):E033. eCollection 2005 Jan-Jun.
5
Rumours: constructive or corrosive.谣言:具有建设性还是腐蚀性。
J Med Ethics. 2005 Sep;31(9):540-1. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.010843.