Chung Henry, Teresi Jeanne, Guarnaccia Peter, Meyers Barnett S, Holmes Douglas, Bobrowitz Tracey, Eimicke Joseph P, Ferran Ernesto
Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY 10017, USA.
Community Ment Health J. 2003 Feb;39(1):33-46. doi: 10.1023/a:1021221806912.
The aims of the study were to: (a) assess the degree to which primary care physicians recognize psychiatric distress among an ethnically diverse primary care sample composed primarily of Asians and Hispanics; and (b) to investigate the relationship between patient and physician sociodemographic factors and overall diagnostic recognition of psychiatric distress. The study sample is comprised of 252 consecutively-selected patients and eleven primary care general internists from general medicine clinics in a large public ambulatory medical center. The measures used were the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale, a demographic questionnaire, and an acculturation scale; these measures were completed during interviews conducted by trained bilingual research assistants. Physicians completed a mental health treatment summary immediately after the patient's visit. Hierarchical logistic regression analyses were performed in order to examine: (1) the degree to which providers identified psychiatric distress and (2) overall diagnostic recognition among this sample in relation to demographic characteristics and degree of acculturation. As measured by the CES-D, almost one half (47.3%) of the Latino and 41.6% ofthe Asian patients had depressive symptoms indicative of psychiatric distress. In contrast, physicians identified 43.8% of Latino patients and only 23.6% of Asian patients as being psychiatrically distressed (p < .01). Physicians were more likely to classify Latinos and those with higher acculturation status as distressed (p < .01 and p < .05, respectively). Higher patient acculturation status was the only factor significantly associated with overall diagnostic recognition (p < .05), as measured by physician agreement with the CES-D. Being Asian and/or having low acculturation levels may put the patient at risk for non-detection of psychiatric distress. The high prevalence of distress lends support to initiating improved methods for screening and detection of depression among low income and racially diverse primary care patients.
(a)评估在主要由亚洲人和西班牙裔组成的种族多样化的初级保健样本中,初级保健医生识别精神痛苦的程度;(b)调查患者和医生的社会人口学因素与精神痛苦的总体诊断识别之间的关系。研究样本包括252名连续选取的患者以及来自一家大型公共门诊医疗中心普通内科诊所的11名初级保健普通内科医生。所使用的测量工具包括流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)、一份人口统计学问卷和一份文化适应量表;这些测量工具是在经过培训的双语研究助理进行访谈期间完成的。医生在患者就诊后立即填写一份心理健康治疗总结。进行了分层逻辑回归分析,以检验:(1)医疗服务提供者识别精神痛苦的程度,以及(2)该样本中与人口统计学特征和文化适应程度相关的总体诊断识别情况。根据CES-D量表测量,近一半(47.3%)的拉丁裔患者和41.6%的亚洲患者有表明精神痛苦的抑郁症状。相比之下,医生将43.8%的拉丁裔患者和仅23.6%的亚洲患者识别为有精神痛苦(p < 0.01)。医生更有可能将拉丁裔患者以及文化适应程度较高的患者归类为有痛苦(分别为p < 0.01和p < 0.05)。患者较高的文化适应程度是与总体诊断识别显著相关的唯一因素(p < 0.05),这是根据医生与CES-D量表的一致性来衡量的。身为亚洲人以及/或者文化适应程度低可能会使患者面临精神痛苦未被发现的风险。痛苦的高患病率支持在低收入和种族多样化的初级保健患者中启动改进的抑郁症筛查和检测方法。