Suppr超能文献

加利福尼亚州北岭地震后医院疏散的影响。

Implications of hospital evacuation after the Northridge, California, earthquake.

作者信息

Schultz Carl H, Koenig Kristi L, Lewis Roger J

机构信息

University of California, Irvine, College of Medicine, Irvine, and the Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, Orange 92668, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 3;348(14):1349-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa021807.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

On January 17, 1994, an earthquake with a moment magnitude (total energy release) of 6.7 occurred in Northridge, California, leading to the evacuation of patients from several hospitals. We examined the reasons for and methods of evacuation and the emergency-management strategies used. The experience in California may have implications for hospital strategies for responding to any major disaster, including an act of terrorism.

METHODS

From September 1995 to September 1996, we surveyed all acute care hospitals in Los Angeles County that reported having evacuated patients after the Northridge earthquake. Physicians, nurses, hospital administrators, and staff on duty at the hospitals during the evacuation responded to a 58-item structured questionnaire.

RESULTS

Eight of 91 acute care hospitals (9 percent) were evacuated. Six hospitals evacuated patients within 24 hours (the immediate-evacuation group), four completely and two partially. All six cited nonstructural damage such as water damage and loss of electrical power as a major reason for evacuation. Five hospitals evacuated the most seriously ill patients first, and one hospital evacuated the healthiest patients first. All hospitals used available equipment to transport patients (blankets, backboards, and gurneys) rather than specialized devices. No deaths resulted from evacuation. One hospital evacuated patients after 3 days and another after 14 days because of structural damage, even though initial inspections had shown no damage (the delayed-evacuation group). Both hospitals required demolition. Some hospitals identified destinations for their evacuated patients independently, whereas others sought the assistance of the Los Angeles County Emergency Operations Center; the two strategies were equally effective.

CONCLUSIONS

After even a moderate earthquake, hospitals are at risk for both immediate nonstructural damage that may force them to evacuate patients and the delayed discovery of structural damage resulting in permanent closure. Evacuation of large numbers of inpatients from multiple hospitals can be accomplished quickly and safely with the use of available resources and personnel.

摘要

背景

1994年1月17日,加利福尼亚州北岭发生了矩震级(总能量释放)为6.7级的地震,导致几家医院的患者被疏散。我们研究了疏散的原因、方法以及所采用的应急管理策略。加利福尼亚州的这一经验可能对医院应对任何重大灾难(包括恐怖主义行为)的策略具有启示意义。

方法

1995年9月至1996年9月,我们对洛杉矶县所有报告在北岭地震后疏散过患者的急症医院进行了调查。疏散期间在医院值班的医生、护士、医院管理人员和工作人员对一份包含58个条目的结构化问卷进行了回答。

结果

91家急症医院中有8家(9%)进行了疏散。6家医院在24小时内疏散了患者(立即疏散组),其中4家全部疏散,2家部分疏散。所有6家都将水损和停电等非结构性损坏作为疏散的主要原因。5家医院先疏散病情最严重的患者,1家医院先疏散身体最健康的患者。所有医院都使用现有的设备(毯子、背板和轮床)运送患者,而不是专门的设备。疏散过程中没有导致死亡。一家医院在3天后疏散患者,另一家在14天后疏散患者,原因是结构损坏,尽管最初检查显示没有损坏(延迟疏散组)。两家医院都需要拆除。一些医院自行确定疏散患者的目的地,而另一些医院则寻求洛杉矶县应急行动中心的帮助;这两种策略同样有效。

结论

即使是中度地震后,医院也面临着可能迫使他们疏散患者的即时非结构性损坏风险,以及延迟发现导致永久关闭的结构性损坏风险。利用现有资源和人员,可以快速、安全地完成从多家医院疏散大量住院患者的工作。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验