• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输尿管结石的即刻或延迟体外冲击波碎石术:一项前瞻性随机研究

Immediate or delayed SWL in ureteric stones: a prospective and randomized study.

作者信息

Uguz Sami, Senkul Temucin, Soydan Hasan, Ates Ferhat, Akyol Ilker, Malkoc Ercan, Baykal Kadir Vehbi

机构信息

Urology Department, GATA Haydarpasa Teaching Hospital, Uskudar, Istanbul, 34668, Turkey.

出版信息

Urol Res. 2012 Dec;40(6):739-44. doi: 10.1007/s00240-012-0490-2. Epub 2012 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00240-012-0490-2
PMID:22763796
Abstract

The objective is to compare immediate and delayed SWL as a treatment for ureter stones between 5 and 20 mm. Patients who applied to the emergency department with single, radio opaque ureteric stone of 5-20 mm size were included in the study. Patients were randomized into immediate and delayed SWL groups. SWL were carried out after pain relief in the delayed group. Maximum of three SWL sessions were applied to the patients with stones of 5 mm or bigger in diameter, leaving at least 3 days interval in-between. Stone-free rate after first session was similar in two groups. When CIRF was also considered as success, the success rate of SWL in the immediate SWL group was higher after first session (p = 0.02). Immediate SWL had a greater success rate in upper ureteric stones (p = 0.019). Overall average time required for elimination of stones was shorter in immediate SWL group than delayed SWL group (p = 0.033). The success rate after first SWL session (including CIRF) was 59 % for patients with chronic pain in the delayed group and 100 % for patients with acute pain in the immediate group. According to the hydronephrosis grade, success rates were 71 and 44.4 % for patients with grade 1 or no hydronephrosis in the immediate SWL group, and for patients with grade 2 or larger hydronephrosis in the delayed SWL group, respectively, after first SWL session. Immediate SWL insures stone-free status in a shorter time in cases with renal colicky pain and ureteral stones, particularly upper ureteral stones.

摘要

目的是比较即刻与延迟体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)治疗直径5至20毫米输尿管结石的效果。研究纳入了因5至20毫米大小的单发、不透X线输尿管结石而到急诊科就诊的患者。患者被随机分为即刻SWL组和延迟SWL组。延迟组在疼痛缓解后进行SWL。对于直径5毫米及以上结石的患者,最多进行三次SWL治疗,每次治疗间隔至少3天。两组首次治疗后的结石清除率相似。若将结石碎片率(CIRF)也视为成功,则即刻SWL组首次治疗后的SWL成功率更高(p = 0.02)。即刻SWL在上段输尿管结石中的成功率更高(p = 0.019)。即刻SWL组结石清除所需的总体平均时间比延迟SWL组短(p = 0.033)。延迟组慢性疼痛患者首次SWL治疗后(包括CIRF)的成功率为59%,即刻组急性疼痛患者的成功率为100%。根据肾积水分级,即刻SWL组1级或无肾积水患者首次SWL治疗后的成功率分别为71%,延迟SWL组2级或更严重肾积水患者的成功率为44.4%。对于肾绞痛和输尿管结石患者,尤其是上段输尿管结石患者,即刻SWL能在更短时间内确保结石清除状态。

相似文献

1
Immediate or delayed SWL in ureteric stones: a prospective and randomized study.输尿管结石的即刻或延迟体外冲击波碎石术:一项前瞻性随机研究
Urol Res. 2012 Dec;40(6):739-44. doi: 10.1007/s00240-012-0490-2. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
2
A prospective randomized comparison between early (<48 hours of onset of colicky pain) versus delayed shockwave lithotripsy for symptomatic upper ureteral calculi: a single center experience.一项针对症状性上尿路结石的前瞻性随机比较:早期(绞痛发作后<48 小时)与延迟冲击波碎石术的比较:单中心经验。
J Endourol. 2010 Dec;24(12):2059-66. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0066. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
3
Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones.体外冲击波碎石术与钬激光联合半硬性输尿管肾镜治疗近端输尿管大结石的比较。
J Urol. 2004 Nov;172(5 Pt 1):1899-902. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000142848.43880.b3.
4
Factors predictive of shockwave lithotripsy failure for ureteral stones: why we need to hurry.输尿管结石冲击波碎石术失败的预测因素:我们为何需要抓紧时间。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2019 Dec;71(6):644-650. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03346-0. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
5
Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.评估平均结石密度和皮肤至结石距离在预测肾和输尿管结石冲击波碎石术成功率中的重要性。
Urol Res. 2010 Aug;38(4):307-13. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0295-0. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
6
Storz Medical Lithotripsy Index Predicts Success of Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Ureteric Stones.Storz 医学碎石指数预测冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的成功率。
Urol J. 2023 Jul 26;20(4):203-207. doi: 10.22037/uj.v20i.7410.
7
A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.高分辨率CT参数预测上尿路结石体外冲击波碎石术成功率的前瞻性评估
J Endourol. 2016 Nov;30(11):1227-1232. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0364. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
8
Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteral stones.比较冲击波碎石术和输尿管镜碎石术治疗上段输尿管大结石的前瞻性随机试验。
Urology. 2006 Mar;67(3):480-4; discussion 484. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.09.067.
9
A simple position to provide better imaging of upper ureteral stones close to the crista iliaca during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy using the Siemens Lithostar.一种简单的体位,用于在使用西门子Lithostar进行体外冲击波碎石术时,对靠近髂嵴的上段输尿管结石提供更好的成像。
Eur Urol. 2004 Mar;45(3):352-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.10.012.
10
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy to distal ureteric stones: the transgluteal approach significantly increases stone-free rates.体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管远端结石:经臀入路可显著提高结石清除率。
BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(2):E129-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11738.x. Epub 2013 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The efficacy of early extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for the treatment of 5 to 10 mm upper ureteral stones: An observational study.早期体外冲击波碎石术治疗 5 至 10 毫米上段输尿管结石的疗效:一项观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jul 26;103(30):e39103. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039103.
2
Effects of Delayed Surgical Intervention Following Emergency Department Presentation on Stone Surgery Complexity.急诊科就诊后延迟手术干预对结石手术复杂性的影响。
J Endourol. 2023 Jun;37(6):729-737. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0843. Epub 2023 May 9.
3
Efficacy of emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral stones: a meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
A prospective randomized comparison between early (<48 hours of onset of colicky pain) versus delayed shockwave lithotripsy for symptomatic upper ureteral calculi: a single center experience.一项针对症状性上尿路结石的前瞻性随机比较:早期(绞痛发作后<48 小时)与延迟冲击波碎石术的比较:单中心经验。
J Endourol. 2010 Dec;24(12):2059-66. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0066. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
2
Evaluation of emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones.急诊体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管梗阻性结石的评估
Int Braz J Urol. 2008 Jul-Aug;34(4):433-40; discussion 441-2. doi: 10.1590/s1677-55382008000400005.
3
急诊体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的疗效:Meta 分析。
BMC Urol. 2023 Apr 4;23(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01226-5.
4
Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of ureteral calculi - Abridged version.加拿大泌尿外科协会指南:输尿管结石的管理——缩略版
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Dec;15(12):383-393. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7652.
5
Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of ureteral calculi - Full-text.加拿大泌尿外科协会指南:输尿管结石的管理 - 全文
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Dec;15(12):E676-E690. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7581.
6
The impact of delaying acute kidney stone surgery on outcomes.延迟急性肾结石手术对治疗结果的影响。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Aug;15(8):E418-E422. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6877.
7
Emergent versus delayed lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones: a cumulative analysis of comparative studies.急诊与延迟碎石术治疗输尿管梗阻结石:荟萃分析比较研究。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Dec;45(6):563-572. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-0960-7. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
8
Acute management of stones: when to treat or not to treat?结石的急性处理:何时治疗及何时不治疗?
World J Urol. 2015 Feb;33(2):203-11. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1353-y. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi.
《2007年输尿管结石管理指南》
Eur Urol. 2007 Dec;52(6):1610-31. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.039.
4
Rapid extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for proximal ureteral calculi in colic versus noncolic patients.急性与非急性患者近端输尿管结石的快速体外冲击波碎石术
Eur Urol. 2007 Oct;52(4):1223-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.02.001. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
5
Rapid extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment after a first colic episode correlates with accelerated ureteral stone clearance.首次肾绞痛发作后立即进行体外冲击波碎石术治疗与输尿管结石清除加速相关。
Eur Urol. 2006 Jun;49(6):1099-105; discussion 1105-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.003. Epub 2005 Dec 28.
6
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones: Does the presence and degree of hydronephrosis affect success?体外冲击波碎石术治疗近端输尿管结石:肾积水的存在及程度是否会影响治疗成功率?
Eur Urol. 2006 Feb;49(2):378-83. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.09.022. Epub 2005 Dec 9.
7
Prospective randomized evaluation of emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) on the short-time outcome of symptomatic ureteral stones.急诊体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)对有症状输尿管结石短期疗效的前瞻性随机评估
Eur Urol. 2005 Jun;47(6):855-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.03.006. Epub 2005 Mar 17.
8
Emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for acute renal colic caused by upper urinary-tract stones.上尿路结石所致急性肾绞痛的急诊体外冲击波碎石术
J Endourol. 2005 Jan-Feb;19(1):1-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.1.
9
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for solitary distal ureteral stones: does the degree of urinary obstruction affect success?体外冲击波碎石术治疗孤立性远端输尿管结石:尿路梗阻程度会影响治疗成功率吗?
J Endourol. 2004 Apr;18(3):237-40. doi: 10.1089/089277904773582822.
10
Emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for obstructing ureteral stones.用于治疗输尿管梗阻性结石的急诊体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)
Eur Urol. 2003 May;43(5):552-5. doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00086-1.