Dupont G, Blondel N, Berthoin S
Laboratoire d'Etudes de la Motricité Humaine, Faculté des Sciences du Sport et de l'Education Physique, Université de Lille 2, France.
Int J Sports Med. 2003 May;24(4):291-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-39503.
This study was designed to propose a standardised procedure to determine the time spent at VO2max (tVO2max) based on the VO2max of the day (i. e. the VO2max value measured the day of the test). Ten male subjects first performed a graded field test, followed by a continuous running exercise to exhaustion, at the velocity of the Université de Montréal Track Test (V(UMTT)) plus 1 km x h(-1) (V(UMTT)(+1)). The second test consisted of an exhaustive run at 100 % of V(UMTT), followed by a V(UMTT)(+1) test. Different methods were used to compare time spent at VO2max, based on the VO2max of the graded field test, and time spent at VO2max, based on the VO2max of the day, during an exhaustive run at 100 % of V(UMTT). Results have shown that V(UMTT)(+1) tests were of sufficient intensity and duration to identify the VO2max of the day. Time spent at VO2max ranged from 25 +/- 53 s to 139 +/- 76 s according to the method used. However, the tVO2max method based on the sum of each value higher than 95 % of VO2max of the day appeared more robust than methods based on the time to exhaustion minus time to reach VO2 reference value, or the method based on the sum of values higher than VO2max minus 2.1 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1).
本研究旨在提出一种标准化程序,以根据当日的最大摄氧量(即测试当天测得的最大摄氧量值)来确定在最大摄氧量时所花费的时间(tVO2max)。十名男性受试者首先进行了分级场地测试,然后以蒙特利尔大学田径测试速度(V(UMTT))加1 km/h(V(UMTT)(+1))进行持续跑步至力竭。第二项测试包括以100%的V(UMTT)进行力竭跑,随后进行V(UMTT)(+1)测试。在以100%的V(UMTT)进行力竭跑期间,使用了不同方法来比较基于分级场地测试的最大摄氧量时所花费的时间和基于当日最大摄氧量的最大摄氧量时所花费的时间。结果表明,V(UMTT)(+1)测试具有足够的强度和持续时间来确定当日的最大摄氧量。根据所使用的方法,在最大摄氧量时所花费的时间范围为25±53秒至139±76秒。然而,基于当日最大摄氧量高于95%的每个值之和的tVO2max方法似乎比基于力竭时间减去达到VO2参考值的时间的方法,或基于高于最大摄氧量减去2.1 ml/kg/min的值之和的方法更可靠。