Crain Noreen, Slonim Anthony, Pollack Murray M
Pediatric Critical Care Division, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2002 Jan;3(1):11-4. doi: 10.1097/00130478-200201000-00003.
To evaluate bispectral index technology in critically ill children and compare its performance to standard clinical assessment of sedation level.
Prospective convenience sample.
Multidisciplinary 16-bed pediatric intensive care unit at a large, urban, university-affiliated children's hospital.
Thirty-one pediatric intensive care unit patients requiring mechanical ventilation and sedation.
Intubated, sedated, pediatric intensive care unit patients were evaluated for their level of sedation by using bispectral index (BIS) and the COMFORT scale twice daily for up to 5 days. The lowest and highest BIS measurements and their corresponding COMFORT scale measurements were selected from each subject. The mean BIS and COMFORT scale measurements were 62.4 +/- 2.6 and 18 +/- 0.6, respectively; however the individual measurements were only moderately correlated. The BIS values were categorized into very deep (<40), deep (41-60), moderate (61-80), and light (>80) levels of sedation. The corresponding COMFORT scale mean measurements in each category were 15.8 +/- 0.6, 16.2 +/- 0.6, 18.1 +/- 1.3, and 22.3 +/- 1.4 (R(2) =.89).
BIS measurements evaluated in clinically relevant ranges compare favorably with a standard assessment of the level of sedation. However, comparisons of BIS and COMFORT scale measurements at isolated moments during a prolonged pediatric intensive care unit course of sedation were less correlated. BIS may be best used to identify and prevent oversedation of patients in the pediatric intensive care unit.
评估双谱指数技术在危重症儿童中的应用,并将其性能与镇静水平的标准临床评估进行比较。
前瞻性便利样本。
一所大型城市大学附属医院的拥有16张床位的多学科儿科重症监护病房。
31名需要机械通气和镇静的儿科重症监护病房患者。
对插管、镇静的儿科重症监护病房患者,每天使用双谱指数(BIS)和COMFORT量表评估镇静水平两次,最长持续5天。从每个受试者中选择最低和最高的BIS测量值及其相应的COMFORT量表测量值。BIS和COMFORT量表的平均测量值分别为62.4±2.6和18±0.6;然而,个体测量值之间仅呈中度相关。BIS值被分为深度镇静(<40)、深度(41 - 60)、中度(61 - 80)和轻度(>80)镇静水平。每个类别中相应的COMFORT量表平均测量值分别为15.8±0.6、16.2±0.6、18.1±1.3和22.3±1.4(R² = 0.89)。
在临床相关范围内评估的BIS测量值与镇静水平的标准评估相比具有优势。然而,在儿科重症监护病房长时间镇静过程中,孤立时刻的BIS和COMFORT量表测量值之间的相关性较低。BIS可能最适合用于识别和预防儿科重症监护病房患者的过度镇静。