• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

On the role of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect.

作者信息

De Houwer Jan

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2003 Apr;31(3):353-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03194393.

DOI:10.3758/bf03194393
PMID:12795477
Abstract

Stroop effects might be due to differences in stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) and/or to differences in stimulus-stimulus compatibility (SSC). Recent evidence for the role of SSC is inconclusive, because there were no controls for effects of SRC that are based on short-term associations between stimuli and responses (i.e., associations set up as the result of task instructions). In two experiments, SRC effects were controlled for. Regardless of whether the irrelevant and the relevant stimulus features were separated (Experiment 1) or integrated in one stimulus (Experiment 2), the results revealed an effect of SSC and an effect of SRC that was based on short-term associations. The results thus confirm that both processes at the level of encoding and processes at the level of response selection contribute to the Stroop effect.

摘要

相似文献

1
On the role of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect.
Mem Cognit. 2003 Apr;31(3):353-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03194393.
2
The Simon effect and its reversal in three-choice Hedge and Marsh tasks: evidence for irrelevant stimulus-response compatibility and stimulus congruity.西蒙效应及其在三选项对冲和马什任务中的反转:无关刺激-反应兼容性和刺激一致性的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Jun;26(3):1018-37. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.3.1018.
3
Orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects emerge even when the stimulus position is task irrelevant.即使刺激位置与任务无关,也会出现正交刺激-反应兼容性效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Jun;59(6):1021-32. doi: 10.1080/17470210500416243.
4
The effect of irrelevant response dimension on stimulus response compatibility.无关反应维度对刺激-反应相容性的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Mar;223:103495. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103495. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
5
Pupillometric contributions to deciphering Stroop conflicts.瞳孔测量对解读 Stroop 冲突的贡献。
Mem Cognit. 2020 Feb;48(2):325-333. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00971-z.
6
Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response.刺激与反应之间的兼容性,涉及与反应重叠和不重叠的相关及不相关刺激维度。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Aug;21(4):855-75. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.21.4.855.
7
Representing response position relative to display location: influence on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility.表示相对于显示位置的反应位置:对正交刺激-反应兼容性的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2005 Jul;58(5):839-64. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000359.
8
Transfer of orthogonal stimulus-response mappings to an orthogonal Simon task.将正交刺激-反应映射转移到正交西蒙任务中。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Apr;62(4):746-65. doi: 10.1080/17470210802303883. Epub 2008 Sep 8.
9
Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition.刺激-刺激相容性和刺激-反应相容性对反应抑制的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2005 Nov;120(3):307-26. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.05.003. Epub 2005 Jul 1.
10
Inhibitory function in the stimulus-response compatibility task.刺激-反应相容性任务中的抑制功能。
Percept Mot Skills. 2005 Feb;100(1):249-57. doi: 10.2466/pms.100.1.249-257.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the spatial interference effects elicited by social and non-social targets: A conditional accuracy function approach.探索社会和非社会目标引发的空间干扰效应:一种条件准确性函数方法。
Br J Psychol. 2025 Feb;116(1):69-88. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12735. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
2
A color-digit Stroop task shows numerical influence on numerosity processing.一项颜色数字斯特鲁普任务显示了数字对数量处理的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Sep 11. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01631-7.
3
Evidence for Two Types of Task Conflict in a Color-Digit Stroop Task.一项颜色-数字斯特鲁普任务中两种类型任务冲突的证据。

本文引用的文献

1
The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.无关位置信息对表现的影响:西蒙和空间斯特鲁普效应综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Jun;2(2):174-207. doi: 10.3758/BF03210959.
2
The role of long-term-memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect.长期记忆与短期记忆联系在西蒙效应中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Apr;26(2):648-70. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.2.648.
3
A parallel distributed processing model of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response compatibility.
J Cogn. 2024 Jul 12;7(1):54. doi: 10.5334/joc.386. eCollection 2024.
4
Flanker interference at both stimulus and response levels decreases with age.刺激和反应水平的侧抑制随年龄增长而减少。
Exp Brain Res. 2024 Mar;242(3):757-767. doi: 10.1007/s00221-023-06773-9. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
5
The impact of bilingualism in within-language conflict resolution: an ERP study.双语在语言内冲突解决中的影响:一项事件相关电位研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 25;14:1173486. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1173486. eCollection 2023.
6
The temporal dynamics of the Stroop effect from childhood to young and older adulthood.从儿童期到青年期和老年期的斯特鲁普效应的时间动态。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 30;18(3):e0256003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256003. eCollection 2023.
7
A comparison between different variants of the spatial Stroop task: The influence of analytic flexibility on Stroop effect estimates and reliability.不同空间 Stroop 任务变体的比较:分析灵活性对 Stroop 效应估计和可靠性的影响。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Feb;56(2):934-951. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02091-8. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
8
A mouse-tracking study of the composite nature of the Stroop effect at the level of response execution.一项在反应执行层面探究斯特鲁普效应复合本质的鼠标追踪研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 19;18(1):e0279036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279036. eCollection 2023.
9
How Emotion Relates to Language and Cognition, Seen Through the Lens of Evaluative Priming Paradigms.从评价性启动范式视角看情绪与语言及认知的关系
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 7;13:911068. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.911068. eCollection 2022.
10
Limitations of cognitive control on emotional distraction - Congruency in the Color Stroop task does not modulate the Emotional Stroop effect.认知控制对情绪分心的局限性 - 在颜色斯特鲁普任务中,一致并不调节情绪斯特鲁普效应。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2022 Feb;22(1):21-41. doi: 10.3758/s13415-021-00935-4. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
刺激-刺激与刺激-反应兼容性的并行分布式处理模型
Cogn Psychol. 1999 May;38(3):386-432. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0703.
4
The effects of stimulus-response mapping and irrelevant stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus overlap in four-choice Stroop tasks with single-carrier stimuli.单载体刺激的四择一Stroop任务中刺激-反应映射、无关刺激-反应及刺激-刺激重叠的影响
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Feb;24(1):3-19. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.1.3.
5
Verbal interference with encoding in a perceptual classification task.
J Exp Psychol. 1970 Feb;83(2):299-303. doi: 10.1037/h0028512.
6
Toward a translational model of Stroop interference.
Mem Cognit. 1985 Jul;13(4):304-19. doi: 10.3758/bf03202499.
7
Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing.类似斯特鲁普效应的文字与图片处理中的情境效应
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1989 Mar;118(1):13-42. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.118.1.13.
8
On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.论自动加工过程的控制:对斯特鲁普效应的并行分布式加工解释
Psychol Rev. 1990 Jul;97(3):332-61. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.97.3.332.
9
Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy.维度重叠:刺激-反应兼容性的认知基础——一个模型与分类法
Psychol Rev. 1990 Apr;97(2):253-70. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.97.2.253.
10
Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review.对斯特鲁普效应的半个世纪研究:一项综合综述。
Psychol Bull. 1991 Mar;109(2):163-203. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163.