• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺腺鳞癌患者肺切除术后预后较差。

Poor prognosis after lung resection for patients with adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung.

作者信息

Nakagawa Katsuhiro, Yasumitu Tsutomu, Fukuhara Kenjirou, Shiono Hiroyuki, Kikui Masanori

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Osaka Prefectural Habikino Hospital, Habikino, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Jun;75(6):1740-4. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00022-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00022-5
PMID:12822609
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the prognosis of adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung after lung resection in comparison with other types of carcinoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients who underwent lung resection for lung cancer.

RESULTS

Surgical outcomes for 30 patients with adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung, who were treated between 1976 and 1998, were compared with the surgical results for 1,219 patients similarly treated for adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma during the same period. Adenosquamous carcinoma comprised only 2.1% of 1,408 lung cancer cases treated by resection. The overall cumulative 5-year survival rate was only 6.2% for the patients with adenosquamous carcinoma, indicating a significantly poorer prognosis than for adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The cumulative survival rate for patients with adenosquamous carcinoma in pathologic stages IA to IIB was similar to that of patients with stage IIIA adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma.

摘要

背景

我们评估了肺切除术后肺腺鳞癌的预后,并与其他类型的肺癌进行比较。

方法

我们回顾性分析了接受肺癌肺切除术患者的病历。

结果

将1976年至1998年间接受治疗的30例肺腺鳞癌患者的手术结果,与同期接受类似治疗的1219例腺癌或鳞癌患者的手术结果进行比较。腺鳞癌仅占1408例接受切除治疗的肺癌病例的2.1%。肺腺鳞癌患者的总体累积5年生存率仅为6.2%,表明其预后明显比腺癌或鳞癌差。

结论

病理分期为IA至IIB期的肺腺鳞癌患者的累积生存率,与IIIA期腺癌或鳞癌患者相似。

相似文献

1
Poor prognosis after lung resection for patients with adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung.肺腺鳞癌患者肺切除术后预后较差。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Jun;75(6):1740-4. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00022-5.
2
Adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung: surgical results as compared with squamous cell and adenocarcinoma cases.肺的腺鳞癌:与鳞癌和腺癌病例的手术结果比较。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Feb;41(2):357-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.05.050. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
3
Adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung. Surgical results compared with squamous cell and adenocarcinoma.肺腺鳞癌。手术结果与鳞状细胞癌和腺癌的比较。
Scand Cardiovasc J. 1999;33(1):29-32. doi: 10.1080/14017439950142000.
4
A clinicopathologic study of the resected cases of adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung.肺腺鳞癌切除病例的临床病理研究
Oncol Rep. 1998 Jul-Aug;5(4):861-5. doi: 10.3892/or.5.4.861.
5
The adenosquamous lung carcinoma: clinical and pathological characteristics.腺鳞癌:临床及病理特征
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1994 Dec;35(6):543-7.
6
Comparison between segmentectomy and larger resection of stage IA non-small cell lung carcinoma.IA期非小细胞肺癌肺段切除术与更大范围切除术的比较。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2004 Feb;45(1):67-70.
7
Wedge resection verses lobectomy for stage 1 non-small-cell lung cancer.1期非小细胞肺癌楔形切除术与肺叶切除术的比较
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2013 Oct;21(5):566-73. doi: 10.1177/0218492312466861. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
8
Prognosis and survival after radical resection of primary adenosquamous lung carcinoma.原发性腺鳞癌根治性切除术后的预后与生存情况
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Apr;27(4):686-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.12.030.
9
A clinicopathologic study of resected cases of adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung.肺腺鳞癌切除病例的临床病理研究
Chest. 1996 Apr;109(4):989-94. doi: 10.1378/chest.109.4.989.
10
Results of pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer.非小细胞肺癌肺切除术的结果。
Acta Oncol. 1997;36(5):493-7. doi: 10.3109/02841869709001305.

引用本文的文献

1
Durable immunotherapeutic response in molecularly complex pulmonary adenosquamous carcinoma: case report and literature review.分子复杂型肺腺鳞癌的持久免疫治疗反应:病例报告及文献综述
Front Immunol. 2025 Jun 26;16:1614283. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1614283. eCollection 2025.
2
Integrative prognostic modeling for stage III lung adenosquamous carcinoma post-tumor resection: machine learning insights and web-based implementation.III期肺腺鳞癌肿瘤切除术后的综合预后模型:机器学习见解与基于网络的实现
Front Surg. 2024 Oct 22;11:1489040. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1489040. eCollection 2024.
3
Adenosquamous Carcinoma of the Lung: Survival, Radiologic Findings, PD-L1, and Driver Mutations.
肺腺鳞癌:生存情况、影像学表现、程序性死亡受体配体1(PD-L1)及驱动基因突变
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 25;13(19):5711. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195711.
4
Comprehensive analyses of genomic features and mutational signatures in adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung.肺腺鳞癌基因组特征和突变特征的综合分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 14;12:945843. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.945843. eCollection 2022.
5
Surgical Options for Resectable Lung Adenosquamous Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.可切除肺腺鳞癌的手术选择:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 1;12:878419. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.878419. eCollection 2022.
6
c-FOS drives reversible basal to squamous cell carcinoma transition.c-FOS 驱动基底细胞癌向鳞状细胞癌的可逆转化。
Cell Rep. 2021 Oct 5;37(1):109774. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109774.
7
Treatment for Patients With Early Stage Adenosquamous Lung Cancer.早期腺鳞癌肺癌患者的治疗
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2020 Mar 4;1(2):100021. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2020.100021. eCollection 2020 Jun.
8
The Comprehensive Analyses of Genomic Variations and Assessment of TMB and PD-L1 Expression in Chinese Lung Adenosquamous Carcinoma.中国肺腺鳞癌基因组变异的综合分析及肿瘤突变负荷和程序性死亡配体1表达的评估
Front Genet. 2021 Feb 17;11:609405. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.609405. eCollection 2020.
9
Risk factors of postoperative recurrence and potential candidate of adjuvant radiotherapy in lung adenosquamous carcinoma.肺腺鳞癌术后复发的危险因素及辅助放疗的潜在候选对象
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Oct;12(10):5593-5602. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-1979.
10
A nomogram to predict prognosis of patients with lung adenosquamous carcinoma: a population-based study.预测肺腺鳞癌患者预后的列线图:一项基于人群的研究。
J Thorac Dis. 2020 May;12(5):2288-2303. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.03.115.