• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉标记抑制单一目标捕获。

Visual marking inhibits singleton capture.

作者信息

Olivers Christian N L, Humphreys Glyn W

机构信息

Behavioural Brain Science Centre, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Cogn Psychol. 2003 Aug;47(1):1-42. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0285(03)00003-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0010-0285(03)00003-3
PMID:12852934
Abstract

This paper is concerned with how we prioritize the selection of new objects in visual scenes. We present four experiments investigating the effects of distractor previews on visual search through new objects. Participants viewed a set of to-be-ignored nontargets, with the task being to search for a target in a second set, added to the first after 1000ms. This second set could contain a salient feature singleton, defined in terms of its color, orientation, or both color and orientation. When the singleton was a distractor, search was slowed relative to when there was no singleton. Search was facilitated when the singleton was a target. Interestingly, both the interference and facilitation effects were modulated when the preview shared features with the singleton. Follow-up experiments showed that this reduction of singleton effects was not due to: (i) low-level sensory aspects of the displays, (ii) increased heterogeneity in the search set in the preview condition, or (iii) color-based grouping of old and new items. Instead, we suggest that there is an inhibitory carry-over from the first to the second set of items based on feature similarity. We suggest the suppression stems from a process termed visual marking, which suppresses irrelevant visual objects in anticipation of more relevant new objects (Watson & Humphreys, 1997). The findings argue against alternative explanations such as the automatic capture by abrupt new onsets account.

摘要

本文关注的是我们如何在视觉场景中对新物体的选择进行优先级排序。我们进行了四项实验,研究干扰物预览对通过新物体进行视觉搜索的影响。参与者观看一组需要忽略的非目标物,任务是在1000毫秒后添加到第一组中的第二组中搜索目标物。第二组可能包含一个显著特征单一物,根据其颜色、方向或颜色和方向两者来定义。当单一物是干扰物时,相对于没有单一物的情况,搜索速度会减慢。当单一物是目标物时,搜索会变得更容易。有趣的是,当预览与单一物共享特征时,干扰和促进效应都会受到调节。后续实验表明,单一物效应的这种降低不是由于:(i)显示的低层次感官方面,(ii)预览条件下搜索集中增加的异质性,或(iii)新旧项目基于颜色的分组。相反,我们认为基于特征相似性,从第一组项目到第二组项目存在抑制性的延续。我们认为这种抑制源于一个被称为视觉标记的过程,该过程在预期更相关的新物体时抑制不相关的视觉物体(沃森和汉弗莱斯,1997)。这些发现反对了诸如突然出现的新刺激自动捕获等替代解释。

相似文献

1
Visual marking inhibits singleton capture.视觉标记抑制单一目标捕获。
Cogn Psychol. 2003 Aug;47(1):1-42. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0285(03)00003-3.
2
Visual marking: the effects of irrelevant changes on preview search.视觉标记:无关变化对预览搜索的影响。
Percept Psychophys. 2005 Apr;67(3):418-34. doi: 10.3758/bf03193321.
3
A singleton distractor updates the inhibitory template for visual marking.单个干扰项会更新用于视觉标记的抑制模板。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jan;192:200-211. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
4
Flexible feature-based inhibition in visual search mediates magnified impairments of selection: evidence from carry-over effects under dynamic preview-search conditions.基于特征的灵活抑制在视觉搜索中调节了选择的放大损伤:来自动态预视搜索条件下的传递效应的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Aug;37(4):1007-16. doi: 10.1037/a0023505.
5
A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.搜索顺序失去作用:忽略单一干扰项会影响视觉搜索效率。
Vision Res. 2010 Jun 25;50(14):1402-13. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.12.002. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
6
Spatial filtering restricts the attentional window during both singleton and feature-based visual search.空间滤波在单一元素搜索和基于特征的视觉搜索过程中都会限制注意力窗口。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jul;82(5):2360-2378. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-01977-5.
7
Selection of new objects by onset capture and visual marking.通过起始捕捉和视觉标记选择新对象。
Vision Res. 2016 May;122:21-33. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.12.009. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
8
No previews are good news: using preview search to probe categorical grouping for orientation.没有预览就是好消息:利用预览搜索探究分类分组以进行定向。
Vision Res. 2007 May;47(11):1464-78. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.01.027. Epub 2007 Apr 12.
9
Temporal Binding and Segmentation in Visual Search: A Computational Neuroscience Analysis.视觉搜索中的时间绑定与分割:计算神经科学分析
J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Oct;28(10):1553-67. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00984. Epub 2016 May 31.
10
Attentional capture by abrupt onsets and feature singletons produces inhibitory surrounds.突然出现的刺激和特征单一物引起的注意捕获会产生抑制性外周效应。
Percept Psychophys. 2000 Oct;62(7):1485-93. doi: 10.3758/bf03212148.

引用本文的文献

1
Selective Visual Attention in ADHD: A Narrative Review.注意缺陷多动障碍中的选择性视觉注意:一篇叙述性综述。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2025 Jul 24;25(1):51. doi: 10.1007/s11910-025-01435-5.
2
Event-related potentials of stimuli inhibition and access in cross-modal distractor-induced blindness.跨模态分心致盲中刺激抑制和进入的事件相关电位。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 23;19(10):e0309425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309425. eCollection 2024.
3
Visual Selection: Usually Fast and Automatic; Seldom Slow and Volitional.视觉选择:通常快速且自动;很少缓慢且出于意志。
J Cogn. 2018 May 14;1(1):29. doi: 10.5334/joc.13.
4
Cortical Mechanisms of Prioritizing Selection for Rejection in Visual Search.视觉搜索中优先选择拒绝的皮质机制。
J Neurosci. 2018 May 16;38(20):4738-4748. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2407-17.2018. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
5
Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention.选择历史:奖励如何调节视觉注意的选择性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Apr;25(2):514-538. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1380-y.
6
Subset selective search on the basis of color and preview.基于颜色和预览的子集选择性搜索。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Jan;79(1):85-99. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1211-7.
7
Parallel distractor rejection as a binding mechanism in search.作为搜索中一种绑定机制的并行干扰物抑制
Front Psychol. 2012 Aug 9;3:278. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00278. eCollection 2012.
8
Templates for rejection: configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features.拒绝模板:配置注意力以忽略任务不相关的特征。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Jun;38(3):580-4. doi: 10.1037/a0027885. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
9
Spreading suppression and the guidance of search by movement: evidence from negative color carry-over effects.扩散抑制和运动引导搜索:来自负颜色传递效应的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Aug;18(4):690-6. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0091-z.
10
Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search?视觉工作记忆的内容在视觉搜索过程中会自动影响注意力的选择吗?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Apr;33(2):363-77. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.2.363.