Suppr超能文献

住院老年内科患者的抑郁症筛查:深入探究

Screening for depression in hospitalized elderly medical patients: taking a closer look.

作者信息

Koenig H G, Meador K G, Cohen H J, Blazer D G

机构信息

Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992 Oct;40(10):1013-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb04478.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To re-examine the test characteristics of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) and the Brief Carroll Depression Rating Scale (BCDRS) in elderly medical inpatients, simulating the procedure followed by clinicians when using screening instruments.

DESIGN

Masked comparison of GDS and BCDRS with psychiatric interview.

SETTING

Durham VA Medical Center.

PARTICIPANTS

109 consecutively admitted persons aged 70 or over.

MEASUREMENTS

Screening by a social worker using GDS and BCDRS on day one, followed the next day by an investigator's structured psychiatric interview to determine the presence of major depressive disorder (MDD).

RESULTS

By this method, the sensitivity and specificity of the GDS (cutoff 11) were 82% and 76%, respectively; for the BCDRS (cutoff 6), they were 73% and 79%. Among those with a negative test, the likelihood of MDD dropped from an a priori probability of 10% to an a posteriori probability of 3% with the GDS and 4% with the BCDRS. Among those with a positive test, the likelihood of MDD was 27% for the GDS and 28% for the BCDRS. Excluding patients with cognitive impairment (MMSE < or = 25) only slightly improved test characteristics.

CONCLUSION

These estimates are considerably below those reported in earlier studies where concordant screening, two-stage screening, or other methods have been utilized and may impact the decision whether or not to screen for depression using these instruments.

摘要

目的

重新审视老年抑郁量表(GDS)和卡罗尔简易抑郁评定量表(BCDRS)在老年内科住院患者中的测试特征,模拟临床医生使用筛查工具时的操作流程。

设计

GDS和BCDRS与精神科访谈的盲法比较。

地点

达勒姆退伍军人事务医疗中心。

参与者

109名年龄在70岁及以上的连续入院患者。

测量方法

第一天由一名社会工作者使用GDS和BCDRS进行筛查,第二天由一名研究人员进行结构化精神科访谈以确定是否存在重度抑郁症(MDD)。

结果

通过这种方法,GDS(临界值为11)的敏感性和特异性分别为82%和76%;BCDRS(临界值为6)的敏感性和特异性分别为73%和79%。在测试结果为阴性的患者中,GDS使MDD的可能性从先验概率10%降至后验概率3%,BCDRS则降至4%。在测试结果为阳性的患者中,GDS诊断MDD的可能性为27%,BCDRS为28%。排除认知障碍患者(简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)≤25)后,测试特征仅略有改善。

结论

这些评估结果远低于早期研究报告的结果,早期研究采用了一致性筛查、两阶段筛查或其他方法,这些结果可能会影响是否使用这些工具进行抑郁症筛查的决策。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验