Redlich Meir, Mayer Yaniv, Harari Doron, Lewinstein Israel
Department of Orthodontics, Hebrew University-Hadassah Faculty of Dental Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Jul;124(1):69-73. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00238-5.
This study evaluated the static friction force created between archwires and "reduced-friction" brackets during sliding mechanics. Five different brands of "reduced-friction" brackets were used: group A: NuEdge (TP Orthodontics, LaPorte, Ind); group B: Discovery (Dentaurum, Ispringen, Germany); group C: Synergy (Rocky Mountain Orthodontics, Denver, Colo); group D: Friction Free (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, Wis); and group E: TIME, a self-ligating bracket (American Orthodontics). Group F (Omni Arch, GAC International, Bohemia, NY) served as a control group. Each group contained 75 stainless steel brackets with.022 x.028-in slots. Three stainless steel wires were tested:.018,.018 x.025, and.019 x.025 in. To take second-order bends into account, the brackets were set at either 5 degrees or 10 degrees to the wires. Each bracket was set in a special device, which was placed on the base of the testing machine. A wire ligated to the bracket was attached to the crosshead of the machine and pulled at a speed of 10 mm/min for a distance of 5 mm. Significant differences were found in the static friction forces among the different groups. Group D (Friction Free) showed the lowest and group E (TIME) showed the highest friction forces (higher than the normal friction brackets [Omni Arch]). This study demonstrates that not all brackets provide "reduced friction," even though the manufacturers describe them as doing so.
本研究评估了滑动力学过程中弓丝与“低摩擦”托槽之间产生的静摩擦力。使用了五种不同品牌的“低摩擦”托槽:A组:NuEdge(TP正畸公司,印第安纳州拉波特);B组:Discovery(德国伊施普林根的登泰克公司);C组:Synergy(科罗拉多州丹佛的落基山正畸公司);D组:Friction Free(威斯康星州希博伊根的美国正畸公司);E组:TIME,一种自锁托槽(美国正畸公司)。F组(纽约州波希米亚的GAC国际公司的Omni Arch)作为对照组。每组包含75个带有0.022×0.028英寸槽沟的不锈钢托槽。测试了三根不锈钢丝:0.018英寸、0.018×0.025英寸和0.019×0.025英寸。为了考虑二阶弯曲,托槽相对于钢丝设置为5度或10度。每个托槽安装在一个特殊装置中,该装置放置在测试机的基座上。结扎在托槽上的钢丝连接到测试机的十字头上,并以10毫米/分钟的速度拉动5毫米的距离。不同组之间的静摩擦力存在显著差异。D组(Friction Free)显示出最低的摩擦力,E组(TIME)显示出最高的摩擦力(高于普通摩擦托槽[Omni Arch])。本研究表明,并非所有托槽都能提供“低摩擦”,尽管制造商称它们能做到这一点。