Thomas Ayanna K, Bulevich John B, Loftus Elizabeth F
Psychology Department, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130-4899, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2003 Jun;31(4):630-40. doi: 10.3758/bf03196103.
Two experiments were conducted to examine whether a misattribution of specific characteristics or a misattribution of global familiarity underlies false memories as assessed through imagination inflation. Using the paradigm developed by Goff and Roediger (1998), we found that the proportion of false memories increased with repeated imagination, replicating the imagination inflation effect. False memories developed through imagination were greatest in conditions that forced participants to include sensory detail in their imaginings. Finally, conscious recollection more often accompanied false memories in perceptually detailed imagination conditions, whereas feelings of familiarity more often accompanied false memories in conditions that lacked sensory cues. These results suggest that imagination that contains more perceptual information leads to more elaborate memory representations containing specific characteristics that can be confused with actually performed actions. Confusion based on these representations, as opposed to confusion based on processing fluency, is more likely to lead to false memories.
进行了两项实验,以检验通过想象膨胀评估的虚假记忆是源于特定特征的错误归因还是整体熟悉度的错误归因。使用戈夫和罗德尼格(1998年)开发的范式,我们发现虚假记忆的比例随着重复想象而增加,重现了想象膨胀效应。在迫使参与者在想象中包含感官细节的条件下,通过想象形成的虚假记忆最为强烈。最后,在感知细节丰富的想象条件下,虚假记忆更常伴随着有意识的回忆,而在缺乏感官线索的条件下,虚假记忆更常伴随着熟悉感。这些结果表明,包含更多感知信息的想象会导致更精细的记忆表征,其中包含可能与实际执行的动作相混淆的特定特征。与基于加工流畅性的混淆相反,基于这些表征的混淆更有可能导致虚假记忆。