Suppr超能文献

记忆与知晓:通向个人过往的两种途径。

Remembering and knowing: two means of access to the personal past.

作者信息

Rajaram S

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1993 Jan;21(1):89-102. doi: 10.3758/bf03211168.

Abstract

The nature of recollective experience was examined in a recognition memory task. Subjects gave "remember" judgments to recognized items that were accompanied by conscious recollection and "know" judgments to items that were recognized on some other basis. Although a levels-of-processing effect (Experiment 1) and a picture-superiority effect (Experiment 2) were obtained for overall recognition, these effects occurred only for "remember" judgments, and were reversed for "know" judgments. In Experiment 3, targets and lures were either preceded by a masked repetition of their own presentation (thought to increase perceptual fluency) or of an unrelated word. The effect of perceptual fluency was obtained for overall recognition and "know" judgments but not for "remember" judgments. The data obtained for confidence judgments using the same design (Experiment 4) indicated that "remember"/"know" judgments are not made solely on the basis of confidence. These data support the two-factor theories of recognition memory by dissociating two forms of recognition, and shed light on the nature of conscious recollection.

摘要

在一项识别记忆任务中,对回忆性体验的本质进行了研究。受试者对伴有有意识回忆的已识别项目做出“记得”判断,对基于其他某种依据而被识别的项目做出“知道”判断。尽管在总体识别方面获得了加工水平效应(实验1)和图片优势效应(实验2),但这些效应仅出现在“记得”判断中,而在“知道”判断中则相反。在实验3中,目标词和诱饵词之前要么是对其自身呈现的掩蔽重复(被认为会提高知觉流畅性),要么是对一个不相关单词的掩蔽重复。知觉流畅性效应在总体识别和“知道”判断中出现,但在“记得”判断中未出现。使用相同设计进行的信心判断所获得的数据(实验4)表明,“记得”/“知道”判断并非仅仅基于信心做出。这些数据通过区分两种识别形式,支持了识别记忆的双因素理论,并阐明了有意识回忆的本质。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验