Mayes Susan Dickerson, Calhoun Susan L
Department of Psychiatry, The Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, USA.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2003 Jun;33(3):329-41. doi: 10.1023/a:1024462719081.
Nonverbal IQs were greater than verbal IQs for young children (3-7 years of age) on the Stanford-Binet:IV (n = 53). However, WISC-III verbal and nonverbal IQs were similar for older children, 6-15 years of age (n = 63). Stanford-Binet:IV profiles were generally consistent for the low-IQ (< 80) and high-IQ (> or = 80) groups, with high scores on visual matching tests (Bead Memory and Quantitative Reasoning). The low- and high-WISC-III IQ groups both performed well relative to IQ on tests of lexical knowledge (Similarities, Information, and Vocabulary), but not on language comprehension and social reasoning (Comprehension). The low-IQ group did best on visuo-motor subtests (Object Assembly and Block Design), but the high-IQ group did not. The high-IQ group had significantly low scores on the Digit Span, Arithmetic, Coding, VMI, and WIAT Written Expression tests, suggesting attention and writing weaknesses.
在斯坦福-比奈智力量表第四版（Stanford-Binet:IV）上，3至7岁幼儿（n = 53）的非言语智商高于言语智商。然而，在韦氏儿童智力量表第三版（WISC-III）上，6至15岁大龄儿童（n = 63）的言语智商和非言语智商相近。斯坦福-比奈智力量表第四版的测试结果在低智商（< 80）和高智商（>或 = 80）组中总体一致，在视觉匹配测试（珠子记忆和定量推理）中得分较高。低智商和高智商的韦氏儿童智力量表第三版组在词汇知识测试（相似性、信息和词汇）中的表现均优于其智商水平，但在语言理解和社会推理测试（理解）中并非如此。低智商组在视觉-运动子测试（物体拼凑和积木设计）中表现最佳，但高智商组并非如此。高智商组在数字广度、算术、编码、视觉-运动整合发育测试（VMI）和韦氏个人成就测验（WIAT）书面表达测试中得分显著较低，表明存在注意力和书写方面的弱点。
