• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用拉伸试验分析钛植入物在骨附着方面的最佳粗糙度值。

Analysing the optimal value for titanium implant roughness in bone attachment using a tensile test.

作者信息

Rønold H J, Lyngstadaas S P, Ellingsen J E

机构信息

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Oral Function, Dental Faculty, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1109 Blindern, N-0317 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Biomaterials. 2003 Nov;24(25):4559-64. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00256-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00256-4
PMID:12950998
Abstract

This study aims at studying the effect of surface roughness on bone attachment of coin-shaped titanium implants. All implants in this study were blasted with TiO(2) particles of 180-220 microm, and then divided into three groups. One group had no further surface treatment whereas the other two groups were subsequently etched with hot hydrochloric acid (0.01M or 1M). The surface topography of the implant specimens was examined by SEM and by a confocal laser scanner for a numeric evaluation of S(a), S(t) and S(dr). The ranging implants in the three groups differed significantly in surface structure. The implants with modified surfaces were then placed into the tibias of 12 rabbits (n=16). After 8 weeks healing, the attachment of bone to implants were examined using a standardised tensile test analysis. The implants that were only blasted (positive control) showed significantly better functional attachment (p<0.001) than the acid etched. Implant surfaces etched with 1M HCl solution had the lowest retention in bone. There was a negative correlation between the increasing roughness and mechanical retention in bone of the implants in this study. The results support observations from earlier studies that suggested an optimal surface roughness for bone attachment, identified by in situ tensile tests and expressed as the arithmetic mean deviation (S(a)), to be in the range between 3.62 and 3.90 microm and that a further attachment depended on mechanical interlocking between bone and implant.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨表面粗糙度对硬币形钛种植体骨附着的影响。本研究中的所有种植体均用180 - 220微米的TiO₂颗粒进行喷砂处理,然后分为三组。一组不再进行表面处理,而另外两组随后用热盐酸(0.01M或1M)蚀刻。通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和共聚焦激光扫描仪检查种植体标本的表面形貌,以对S(a)、S(t)和S(dr)进行数值评估。三组中的种植体在表面结构上有显著差异。然后将表面改性的种植体植入12只兔子(n = 16)的胫骨中。愈合8周后,使用标准化拉伸试验分析检查骨与种植体的附着情况。仅经过喷砂处理的种植体(阳性对照)显示出比酸蚀刻种植体显著更好的功能附着(p < 0.001)。用1M HCl溶液蚀刻的种植体在骨中的保留率最低。在本研究中,种植体表面粗糙度的增加与骨中的机械固位之间存在负相关。这些结果支持了早期研究的观察结果,即通过原位拉伸试验确定并表示为算术平均偏差(S(a))的骨附着最佳表面粗糙度在3.62至3.90微米之间,并且进一步的附着取决于骨与种植体之间的机械嵌合。

相似文献

1
Analysing the optimal value for titanium implant roughness in bone attachment using a tensile test.使用拉伸试验分析钛植入物在骨附着方面的最佳粗糙度值。
Biomaterials. 2003 Nov;24(25):4559-64. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00256-4.
2
A study on the effect of dual blasting with TiO2 on titanium implant surfaces on functional attachment in bone.
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003 Nov 1;67(2):524-30. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.10580.
3
Effect of micro-roughness produced by TiO2 blasting--tensile testing of bone attachment by using coin-shaped implants.二氧化钛喷砂产生的微观粗糙度的影响——使用硬币形种植体对骨附着进行拉伸测试。
Biomaterials. 2002 Nov;23(21):4211-9. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00167-9.
4
Determining optimal surface roughness of TiO(2) blasted titanium implant material for attachment, proliferation and differentiation of cells derived from human mandibular alveolar bone.确定用于人下颌牙槽骨来源细胞附着、增殖和分化的二氧化钛喷砂钛种植体材料的最佳表面粗糙度。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 Oct;12(5):515-25. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120513.x.
5
The removal torque of titanium screw inserted in rabbit tibia treated by dual acid etching.经双酸蚀刻处理后植入兔胫骨的钛螺钉的取出扭矩。
Biomaterials. 2003 Sep;24(20):3611-7. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00218-7.
6
Effect of H2O2/HCl heat treatment of implants on in vivo peri-implant bone formation.植入物经H2O2/HCl热处理对体内种植体周围骨形成的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Nov-Dec;23(6):1020-8.
7
An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of bioactive titanium implants following sodium removal treatment.脱钠处理后生物活性钛植入物的体外和体内评价
Dent Mater. 2009 Jan;25(1):48-57. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.05.007. Epub 2008 Jun 27.
8
Influence of implant surface topography on bone-regenerative potential and mechanical retention in the human maxilla and mandible.种植体表面形貌对人类上颌骨和下颌骨骨再生潜能及机械固位的影响。
Am J Dent. 2014 Jun;27(3):171-6.
9
Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure.用于增强骨结合的氧化植入物的最佳表面特性:表面化学、氧化层厚度、孔隙率、粗糙度和晶体结构。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 May-Jun;20(3):349-59.
10
Low-level laser therapy stimulates bone-implant interaction: an experimental study in rabbits.低强度激光疗法刺激骨-种植体相互作用:一项在兔子身上的实验研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Jun;15(3):325-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00994.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Surface Topography Has Less Influence on Peri-Implantitis than Patient Factors: A Comparative Clinical Study of Two Dental Implant Systems.表面形貌对种植体周围炎的影响小于患者因素:两种牙科种植系统的对比临床研究。
ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2024 Jul 8;10(7):4562-4574. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01809. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
2
Improving the Surface Integrity of 316L Steel in the Context of Bioimplant Applications.在生物植入应用背景下改善316L钢的表面完整性
Materials (Basel). 2023 Apr 28;16(9):3460. doi: 10.3390/ma16093460.
3
Modeling the debonding process of osseointegrated implants due to coupled adhesion and friction.
基于黏附与摩擦耦合的骨整合种植体脱粘过程建模。
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2023 Feb;22(1):133-158. doi: 10.1007/s10237-022-01637-7. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
4
In-Vitro Phenotypic Response of Human Osteoblasts to Different Degrees of Titanium Surface Roughness.人成骨细胞对不同程度钛表面粗糙度的体外表型反应
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Jul 29;10(8):140. doi: 10.3390/dj10080140.
5
On the Morphological Deviation in Additive Manufacturing of Porous Ti6Al4V Scaffold: A Design Consideration.多孔Ti6Al4V支架增材制造中的形态偏差:设计考量
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jul 6;15(14):4729. doi: 10.3390/ma15144729.
6
Relevant Aspects of Titanium and Zirconia Dental Implants for Their Fatigue and Osseointegration Behaviors.钛和氧化锆牙科植入物在疲劳和骨整合行为方面的相关情况。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jun 6;15(11):4036. doi: 10.3390/ma15114036.
7
Is There a Better Biomaterial for Dental Implants than Titanium?-A Review and Meta-Study Analysis.是否存在比钛更好的用于牙种植体的生物材料?——一项综述与荟萃研究分析
J Funct Biomater. 2022 Apr 20;13(2):46. doi: 10.3390/jfb13020046.
8
biocompatibility of a sandblasted, acid-etched HA composite coating on ultrafine-grained titanium.一种喷砂、酸蚀的羟基磷灰石复合涂层在超细晶粒钛上的生物相容性
RSC Adv. 2021 Feb 3;11(11):6124-6130. doi: 10.1039/d0ra10146j. eCollection 2021 Feb 2.
9
A comprehensive review on metallic implant biomaterials and their subtractive manufacturing.金属植入生物材料及其减材制造的综合综述
Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2022;120(3-4):1473-1530. doi: 10.1007/s00170-022-08770-8. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
10
Mineralization of Titanium Surfaces: Biomimetic Implants.钛表面矿化:仿生植入物
Materials (Basel). 2021 May 27;14(11):2879. doi: 10.3390/ma14112879.