• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“让我们提高警惕!”倡议:一项烟雾报警器赠送计划。

The "Let's Get Alarmed!" initiative: a smoke alarm giveaway programme.

作者信息

DiGuiseppi C, Slater S, Roberts I, Adams L, Sculpher M, Wade A, McCarthy M

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Medical School, UK.

出版信息

Inj Prev. 1999 Sep;5(3):177-82. doi: 10.1136/ip.5.3.177.

DOI:10.1136/ip.5.3.177
PMID:10518263
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1730526/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To reduce fires and fire related injuries by increasing the prevalence of functioning smoke alarms in high risk households.

SETTING

The programme was delivered in an inner London area with above average material deprivation and below average smoke alarm ownership. The target population included low income and rental households and households with elderly persons or young children.

METHODS

Forty wards, averaging 4000 households each, were randomised to intervention or control status. Free smoke alarms and fire safety information were distributed in intervention wards by community groups and workers as part of routine activities and by paid workers who visited target neighbourhoods. Recipients provided data on household age distribution and housing tenure. Programme costs were documented from a societal perspective. Data are being collected on smoke alarm ownership and function, and on fires and related injuries and their costs.

RESULTS

Community and paid workers distributed 20,050 smoke alarms, potentially sufficient to increase smoke alarm ownership by 50% in intervention wards. Compared with the total study population, recipients included greater proportions of low income and rental households and households including children under 5 years or adults aged 65 and older. Total programme costs were 145,087 Pounds.

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible to implement a large scale smoke alarm giveaway programme targeted to high risk households in a densely populated, multicultural, materially deprived community. The programme's effects on the prevalence of installed and functioning alarms and the incidence of fires and fire related injuries, and its cost effectiveness, are being evaluated as a randomized controlled trial.

摘要

目标

通过提高高风险家庭中正常运行的烟雾报警器的普及率来减少火灾及与火灾相关的伤害。

背景

该项目在伦敦市中心一个物质匮乏程度高于平均水平且烟雾报警器拥有率低于平均水平的地区实施。目标人群包括低收入家庭、租赁家庭以及有老年人或幼儿的家庭。

方法

将40个 wards(每个wards平均有4000户家庭)随机分为干预组或对照组。社区团体和工作人员在干预wards作为日常活动的一部分免费发放烟雾报警器和消防安全信息,付费工作人员则走访目标社区进行发放。接受者提供了家庭年龄分布和住房 tenure的数据。从社会角度记录了项目成本。正在收集有关烟雾报警器的拥有情况和功能以及火灾、相关伤害及其成本的数据。

结果

社区和付费工作人员共发放了20,050个烟雾报警器,这可能足以使干预wards的烟雾报警器拥有率提高50%。与整个研究人群相比,接受者中低收入家庭、租赁家庭以及有5岁以下儿童或65岁及以上成年人的家庭所占比例更高。项目总成本为145,087英镑。

结论

在一个人口密集、多元文化且物质匮乏的社区中,有可能针对高风险家庭实施大规模的烟雾报警器赠送项目。该项目对已安装且正常运行的报警器普及率、火灾及与火灾相关伤害发生率的影响及其成本效益,正在作为一项随机对照试验进行评估。

相似文献

1
The "Let's Get Alarmed!" initiative: a smoke alarm giveaway programme.“让我们提高警惕!”倡议:一项烟雾报警器赠送计划。
Inj Prev. 1999 Sep;5(3):177-82. doi: 10.1136/ip.5.3.177.
2
Incidence of fires and related injuries after giving out free smoke alarms: cluster randomised controlled trial.发放免费烟雾报警器后火灾及相关伤害的发生率:整群随机对照试验
BMJ. 2002 Nov 2;325(7371):995. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7371.995.
3
Smoke alarm ownership and installation: a comparison of a rural and a suburban community in Georgia.烟雾报警器的拥有情况与安装情况:佐治亚州一个农村社区和一个郊区社区的对比
J Community Health. 2001 Oct;26(5):307-29. doi: 10.1023/a:1010478116532.
4
Smoke alarm installation and function in inner London council housing.伦敦市中心区市政住房中的烟雾报警器安装与功能
Arch Dis Child. 1999 Nov;81(5):400-3. doi: 10.1136/adc.81.5.400.
5
Interventions for promoting smoke alarm ownership and function.促进烟雾报警器拥有率和功能的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;2001(2):CD002246. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002246.
6
Do smoke alarms still function a year after installation? A follow-up of the get-alarmed campaign.烟雾报警器在安装一年后仍能正常工作吗?“提高警觉”活动的后续跟进。
J Community Health. 2004 Apr;29(2):171-81. doi: 10.1023/b:johe.0000016720.38681.61.
7
Systematic review of controlled trials of interventions to promote smoke alarms.促进烟雾报警器使用的干预措施对照试验的系统评价
Arch Dis Child. 2000 May;82(5):341-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.82.5.341.
8
Effectiveness of a Voice Smoke Alarm Using the Child's Name for Sleeping Children: A Randomized Trial.使用儿童姓名的语音烟雾报警器对儿童睡眠有效性的影响:一项随机试验。
J Pediatr. 2019 Feb;205:250-256.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.09.027. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
9
Cost-effectiveness of interventions for increasing the possession of functioning smoke alarms in households with pre-school children: a modelling study.增加有学龄前儿童家庭中正常工作烟雾报警器拥有量的干预措施的成本效益:一项建模研究。
BMC Public Health. 2014 May 16;14:459. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-459.
10
Disparities in the prevalence of smoke alarms in U.S. households: Conclusions drawn from published case studies.美国家庭中烟雾报警器普及率的差异:基于已发表案例研究的结论。
J Safety Res. 2011 Oct;42(5):409-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of interventions for increasing the possession of functioning smoke alarms in households with pre-school children: a modelling study.增加有学龄前儿童家庭中正常工作烟雾报警器拥有量的干预措施的成本效益:一项建模研究。
BMC Public Health. 2014 May 16;14:459. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-459.
2
Enhancing fire department home visiting programs: results of a community intervention trial.加强消防部门家访计划:一项社区干预试验的结果
J Burn Care Res. 2013 Jul-Aug;34(4):e250-6. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182685b3a.
3
Home safety education and provision of safety equipment for injury prevention.居家安全教育及提供预防伤害的安全设备。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD005014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005014.pub3.
4
Bridging the gap between research and practice: a continuing challenge.弥合研究与实践之间的差距:一项持续的挑战。
Inj Prev. 2006 Dec;12(6):357-9. doi: 10.1136/ip.2006.014159.
5
Road safety campaigns: do they work?道路安全宣传活动:它们有效吗?
Inj Prev. 2005 Jun;11(3):151. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.008995.
6
It might work in Oklahoma but will it work in Oakhampton? Context and implementation in the effectiveness literature on domestic smoke detectors.它在俄克拉荷马州可能行得通,但在奥克汉普顿会有效吗?家庭烟雾探测器有效性文献中的背景与实施情况。
Inj Prev. 2005 Jun;11(3):148-51. doi: 10.1136/ip.2004.007336.
7
Community-based interventions for the prevention of burns and scalds in children.基于社区的儿童烧伤和烫伤预防干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2004(3):CD004335. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004335.pub2.
8
Home delivery of an injury prevention kit for children in four French cities: a controlled randomized trial.法国四个城市儿童伤害预防套件的家庭配送:一项对照随机试验。
Inj Prev. 2003 Sep;9(3):261-5; discussion 265. doi: 10.1136/ip.9.3.261.
9
Incidence of fires and related injuries after giving out free smoke alarms: cluster randomised controlled trial.发放免费烟雾报警器后火灾及相关伤害的发生率:整群随机对照试验
BMJ. 2002 Nov 2;325(7371):995. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7371.995.
10
Updating the evidence. A systemic review of what works in preventing childhood unintentional injuries: Part 2.更新证据。预防儿童意外伤害有效措施的系统评价:第2部分。
Inj Prev. 2001 Sep;7(3):249-53. doi: 10.1136/ip.7.3.249.

本文引用的文献

1
Smoke alarm ownership and house fire death rates in children.儿童烟雾报警器的拥有情况与房屋火灾死亡率
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Nov;52(11):760-1. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.11.760.
2
Smoke alarm use: prevalence and household predictors.烟雾报警器的使用:普及率及家庭预测因素
Inj Prev. 1996 Dec;2(4):263-5. doi: 10.1136/ip.2.4.263.
3
Injury mortality among children and teenagers in England and Wales, 1992.1992年英格兰和威尔士儿童及青少年的伤害死亡率
Inj Prev. 1997 Mar;3(1):47-9. doi: 10.1136/ip.3.1.47.
4
Does the decline in child injury mortality vary by social class? A comparison of class specific mortality in 1981 and 1991.儿童伤害死亡率的下降是否因社会阶层而异?1981年和1991年特定阶层死亡率的比较。
BMJ. 1996 Sep 28;313(7060):784-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7060.784.
5
Surveillance and prevention of residential-fire injuries.住宅火灾伤害的监测与预防。
N Engl J Med. 1996 Jul 4;335(1):27-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199607043350106.
6
An injury prevention program in an urban African-American community.城市非裔美国社区的一项伤害预防计划。
Am J Public Health. 1993 May;83(5):675-80. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.5.675.
7
The incidence and severity of burn injuries following Project Burn Prevention.烧伤预防项目实施后的烧伤发生率及严重程度。
Am J Public Health. 1982 Mar;72(3):248-52. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.3.248.
8
Project Burn Prevention: outcome and implications.烧伤预防项目:结果与启示
Am J Public Health. 1982 Mar;72(3):241-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.3.241.
9
Underprivileged areas: validation and distribution of scores.贫困地区:分数的验证与分布
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Dec 8;289(6458):1587-92. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6458.1587.
10
Prevention of childhood injuries: evaluation of the Statewide Childhood Injury Prevention Program (SCIPP).儿童伤害预防:全州儿童伤害预防计划(SCIPP)评估
Am J Public Health. 1989 Nov;79(11):1521-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.11.1521.