• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨髓穿刺时的疼痛:发生率与预防

Pain during bone marrow aspiration: prevalence and prevention.

作者信息

Vanhelleputte Philine, Nijs Kristel, Delforge Michel, Evers Georges, Vanderschueren Steven

机构信息

Center for Hospital Services and Nursing Research, University Hospital Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003 Sep;26(3):860-6. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(03)00312-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0885-3924(03)00312-9
PMID:12967736
Abstract

The prevalence, intensity, determinants and prevention of pain during bone marrow aspiration (BMA) in adults are not well defined. In the first part of this prospective study (observational phase), 132 adult hematological patients undergoing BMA after local anesthesia scored the procedural pain by means of a visual analogue scale (VAS). Moderate to severe pain was defined as a VAS score exceeding 30 mm. Eighty-six percent reported procedural pain. The VAS score (mean+/-SEM) was 27.2+/-2.1 mm. Thirty-six percent of patients graded the pain as moderate to severe. In a linear regression analysis, VAS score correlated positively with the duration of the procedure (P=0.029) and negatively with the age of the patient (P=0.006). In the second part of the study (interventional phase), 100 patients were randomized to 50 mg tramadol or placebo, given orally at least one hour before BMA. VAS scores during aspiration were significantly lower in tramadol recipients versus placebo recipients (16.5+/-3.0 mm and 28.8+/-3.4 mm, respectively, P=0.003). Pretreatment with tramadol reduced the percentage of patients with at least moderate pain from 40% to 20% (P=0.029). Four tramadol and 3 placebo recipients reported side effects (dizziness or sedation). In conclusion, notwithstanding local anesthesia, the great majority of adult hematological patients experience transient pain during BMA that is of at least moderate intensity in over a third. Pretreatment with tramadol lowers pain intensity significantly and is well tolerated.

摘要

成人骨髓穿刺术(BMA)期间疼痛的患病率、强度、决定因素及预防尚不明确。在这项前瞻性研究的第一部分(观察阶段),132例接受局部麻醉后进行BMA的成年血液学患者通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)对操作过程中的疼痛进行评分。中度至重度疼痛定义为VAS评分超过30mm。86%的患者报告有操作过程中的疼痛。VAS评分(均值±标准误)为27.2±2.1mm。36%的患者将疼痛评为中度至重度。在线性回归分析中,VAS评分与操作持续时间呈正相关(P = 0.029),与患者年龄呈负相关(P = 0.006)。在研究的第二部分(干预阶段),100例患者被随机分为两组,分别口服50mg曲马多或安慰剂,在BMA前至少1小时给药。曲马多组患者穿刺时的VAS评分显著低于安慰剂组(分别为16.5±3.0mm和28.8±3.4mm,P = 0.003)。曲马多预处理使至少中度疼痛患者的比例从40%降至20%(P = 0.029)。4例曲马多组和3例安慰剂组患者报告有副作用(头晕或镇静)。总之,尽管采用了局部麻醉,但绝大多数成年血液学患者在BMA期间仍会经历短暂疼痛,其中超过三分之一的患者疼痛强度至少为中度。曲马多预处理可显著降低疼痛强度,且耐受性良好。

相似文献

1
Pain during bone marrow aspiration: prevalence and prevention.骨髓穿刺时的疼痛:发生率与预防
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003 Sep;26(3):860-6. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(03)00312-9.
2
Single-dose intravenous tramadol for acute migraine pain in adults: a single-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.单剂量静脉注射曲马多治疗成人急性偏头痛:一项单盲、前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照临床试验。
Clin Ther. 2007 Jul;29(7):1441-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.07.017.
3
Pain and anxiety during bone marrow aspiration/biopsy: Comparison of ratings among patients versus health-care professionals.骨髓抽吸/活检时的疼痛和焦虑:患者与医护人员评分比较。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2012 Jul;16(3):323-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2011.07.009. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
4
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of tramadol IR and SR in elderly patients: a prospective, age-group-controlled study.曲马多即释制剂和缓释制剂在老年患者中的药代动力学和药效学特性:一项前瞻性、年龄组对照研究。
Clin Ther. 2006 Dec;28(12):2022-39. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.12.007.
5
Role of oral tramadol 50 mg in reducing pain associated with outpatient hysteroscopy: A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial.口服50毫克曲马多在减轻门诊宫腔镜检查相关疼痛中的作用:一项随机双盲安慰剂对照试验。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Feb;56(1):102-6. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12431.
6
Tramadol versus Celecoxib for reducing pain associated with outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.曲马多与塞来昔布用于减轻门诊宫腔镜检查相关疼痛的比较:一项随机双盲安慰剂对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2016 Jan;31(1):60-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev291. Epub 2015 Nov 29.
7
[Are tramadol enantiomers for postoperative pain therapy better suited than the racemate? A randomized, placebo- and morphine-controlled double blind study].[曲马多对映体用于术后疼痛治疗是否比消旋体更合适?一项随机、安慰剂和吗啡对照的双盲研究]
Anaesthesist. 1998 May;47(5):387-94. doi: 10.1007/s001010050574.
8
Tramadol versus hydrocodone-acetaminophen in acute musculoskeletal pain: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.曲马多与氢可酮-对乙酰氨基酚治疗急性肌肉骨骼疼痛的随机双盲临床试验
Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Aug;32(2):139-43. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70127-1.
9
Comparison of the analgesic effects of oral tramadol and naproxen sodium on pain relief during IUD insertion.比较口服曲马多和萘普生钠在宫内节育器放置过程中缓解疼痛的效果。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012 Sep-Oct;19(5):581-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
10
Cobrotoxin-containing analgesic compound to treat chronic moderate to severe cancer pain: results from a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study and from an open-label study.含眼镜蛇毒素的镇痛化合物治疗慢性中度至重度癌痛:一项随机、双盲、交叉研究及一项开放标签研究的结果
Oncol Rep. 2006 Nov;16(5):1077-84. doi: 10.3892/or.16.5.1077.

引用本文的文献

1
The efficacy of virtual reality in adults during puncture biopsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.虚拟现实在成人穿刺活检中的疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 26;20(8):e0330364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330364. eCollection 2025.
2
A Nomogram Built on Clinical Factors and CT Attenuation Scores for Predicting Treatment Response of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients.基于临床因素和CT衰减评分构建的预测急性髓系白血病患者治疗反应的列线图。
Biomedicines. 2025 Jan 15;13(1):198. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13010198.
3
Intraosseous Treatment of Bone Marrow Lesions in the Knee: Surgical Technique.
膝关节骨髓病变的骨内治疗:手术技术
Arthrosc Tech. 2024 Mar 18;13(6):102965. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.102965. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Flow cytometric analysis of peripheral blood neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression in myelodysplastic neoplasms (MPO-MDS-Valid): protocol for a multicentre diagnostic accuracy study.流式细胞术分析骨髓增生异常肿瘤外周血中性粒细胞髓过氧化物酶表达(MPO-MDS-Valid):一项多中心诊断准确性研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 17;14(6):e081200. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081200.
5
Intraosseous pressure measurement during iliac bone marrow biopsy: its feasibility and difference of IOP in diseased marrow and non-diseased marrow.髂骨骨髓活检时的骨内压测量:其可行性及病变骨髓与非病变骨髓内压的差异。
Skeletal Radiol. 2024 Mar;53(3):481-487. doi: 10.1007/s00256-023-04431-3. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
6
A prospective survey on trephine biopsy of bone and bone marrow: an experience with 274 Indian patients' biopsies.一项针对 274 例印度患者的活检的环钻式骨和骨髓活检的前瞻性研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Jun 24;28(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01167-7.
7
A New Option for Pain Prevention Using a Therapeutic Virtual Reality Solution for Bone Marrow Biopsy (REVEH Trial): Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study.一种使用治疗性虚拟现实解决方案预防骨髓活检疼痛的新选择(REVEH 试验):开放标签、随机、多中心、3 期研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 15;25:e38619. doi: 10.2196/38619.
8
A study of patient-reported pain during bone marrow aspiration and biopsy using local anesthesia alone compared with local anesthesia with intravenous midazolam coadministration at a tertiary academic hospital in South Africa.在南非一家三级学术医院进行的一项研究,比较了仅使用局部麻醉与局部麻醉联合静脉注射咪达唑仑时患者报告的骨髓穿刺和活检期间的疼痛情况。
Health Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 31;5(6):e902. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.902. eCollection 2022 Nov.
9
Pain Assessment Using Virtual Reality Facemask During Bone Marrow Aspiration: Prospective Study Including Propensity-Matched Analysis.在骨髓穿刺过程中使用虚拟现实面罩进行疼痛评估:包括倾向匹配分析的前瞻性研究
JMIR Serious Games. 2022 Oct 12;10(4):e33221. doi: 10.2196/33221.
10
Flow cytometry lyophilised-reagent tube for quantifying peripheral blood neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression in myelodysplastic syndromes (MPO-MDS-Develop): protocol for a diagnostic accuracy study.流式细胞术冻干试剂管定量检测骨髓增生异常综合征外周血中性粒细胞髓过氧化物酶表达(MPO-MDS-Develop):诊断准确性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 7;12(10):e065850. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065850.