Pillmann Frank, Blöink Raffaela, Balzuweit Sabine, Haring Annette, Marneros Andreas
Department of Psychiatry, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2003 Aug;191(8):503-8. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000082211.05819.02.
Although a particularly vulnerable personality has been postulated by some authors as a pathogenetic factor in acute and transient psychotic disorders (ATPD) as introduced with ICD-10, little empirical work has been done on the subject. We therefore evaluated personality features and social interactions in a comparative study of patients with ATPD. We recruited all consecutive inpatients fulfilling the ICD-10 criteria of ATPD (F23) during a 5-year period, as well as control groups with "positive" schizophrenia (PS) and bipolar schizoaffective disorder (BSAD) matched for gender and age at index episode. For assessment of personality features and premorbid social contacts, we administered the NEO Five-Factor Inventory and a semi-structured interview. The assessment of the "Big Five" personality dimensions (neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, conscientiousness) with the NEO-FFI did not show any significant difference between ATPD patients and healthy controls. BSAD patients differed from mentally healthy controls on 2 of 5 subscales of the NEO-FFI (neuroticism, extraversion), but were otherwise indiscernible from ATPD patients and mentally healthy controls. In contrast, PS patients showed the most pronounced differences from the mentally healthy controls on the NEO-FFI, and had significantly less premorbid social interaction than the clinical controls. Within the limits of retrospective assessment, the present findings indicate that (1) patients with ATPD do not share the premorbid social impairment characteristic of schizophrenic patients and (2) the personality of patients with ATPD does not differ substantially from the general population.
尽管一些作者假定,如国际疾病分类第10版(ICD - 10)中引入的急性短暂性精神病性障碍(ATPD)的发病机制中存在一种特别易受影响的人格,但关于这一主题的实证研究很少。因此,我们在一项针对ATPD患者的比较研究中评估了人格特征和社会互动。我们招募了在5年期间所有符合ICD - 10中ATPD(F23)标准的连续住院患者,以及在发病时年龄和性别相匹配的“阳性”精神分裂症(PS)和双相精神分裂症性障碍(BSAD)对照组。为了评估人格特征和病前社会接触情况,我们使用了NEO五因素问卷和半结构化访谈。使用NEO - FFI对“大五”人格维度(神经质、外向性、开放性、宜人性、尽责性)进行评估时,ATPD患者与健康对照组之间没有显示出任何显著差异。BSAD患者在NEO - FFI的5个分量表中的2个(神经质、外向性)上与心理健康对照组存在差异,但在其他方面与ATPD患者和心理健康对照组难以区分。相比之下,PS患者在NEO - FFI上与心理健康对照组的差异最为明显,并且病前社会互动明显少于临床对照组。在回顾性评估的范围内,目前的研究结果表明:(1)ATPD患者不具有精神分裂症患者特有的病前社会功能损害;(2)ATPD患者的人格与一般人群没有实质性差异。