Lazizi Y, Elfassi E, Pillot J
Service de Microbiologie et d'Immunologie, Hôpital Antoine Beclere, Clamart, France.
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Apr;30(4):931-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.4.931-934.1992.
The specificity of first-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELIAs) for antibody detection in individuals with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been questioned in some pathological situations. We observed a surprisingly high prevalence of anti-HCV antibodies in alcoholic patients, and thus, false-positive reactions in anti-HCV tests were strongly suspected. The introduction of new epitopes, particularly a core protein, C22 (second-generation tests), seems to increase the sensitivity of anti-HCV detection. In order to study the specificity of the second-generation tests, 60 serum samples from alcoholic patients found to be positive by the first-generation anti-HCV ELISA (Ortho) were reexamined by a second-generation anti-HCV enzyme immunoassay (Abbott) and a recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA II; Chiron). Fifteen serum samples gave contradictory results when they were tested by the two assays. We performed nested polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) to confirm that the discrepancies that we observed could be due to the presence of low levels of anti-HCV antibodies, which were detected by a more sensitive test, or to unspecific positive reactions. Nested PCR revealed the presence of HCV RNA sequences in all anti-HCV-positive sera or sera that were weakly positive by ELISA. Anti-HCV positive by RIBA II was always correlated with the presence of viral RNA in serum, but HCV RNA was detected in RIBA II-negative sera. These results indicate that the specificity of the second-generation tests is an important improvement but that an HCV infection can still persist without detectable antibodies. PCR remains the reference assay to clear up controversial serology results and to detect HCV infection in patients with no anti-HCV-detectable immune response.
在某些病理情况下,第一代酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)用于检测丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染个体抗体的特异性受到质疑。我们观察到酒精性肝病患者中抗-HCV抗体的患病率出奇地高,因此,强烈怀疑抗-HCV检测中存在假阳性反应。新表位的引入,特别是核心蛋白C22(第二代检测),似乎提高了抗-HCV检测的灵敏度。为了研究第二代检测的特异性,我们用第二代抗-HCV酶免疫测定法(雅培)和重组免疫印迹法(RIBA II;凯龙)对60份经第一代抗-HCV ELISA(奥索)检测为阳性的酒精性肝病患者血清样本进行了重新检测。15份血清样本在两种检测方法中检测结果相互矛盾。我们进行了巢式聚合酶链反应(PCR),以确认我们观察到的差异可能是由于存在低水平的抗-HCV抗体(通过更灵敏检测方法检测到),或者是非特异性阳性反应。巢式PCR显示,所有抗-HCV阳性血清或ELISA弱阳性血清中均存在HCV RNA序列。RIBA II检测抗-HCV阳性总是与血清中病毒RNA的存在相关,但在RIBA II阴性血清中也检测到了HCV RNA。这些结果表明,第二代检测的特异性有了重要提高,但HCV感染仍可能在无抗体可检测的情况下持续存在。PCR仍然是解决有争议的血清学结果以及检测无抗-HCV可检测免疫反应患者中HCV感染的参考检测方法。