Suppr超能文献

通过脉冲场凝胶电泳对凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌进行比较。

Comparison of coagulase-negative staphylococci by pulsed-field electrophoresis.

作者信息

Lina B, Vandenesch F, Etienne J, Kreiswirth B, Fleurette J

机构信息

Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Lyon, France.

出版信息

FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1992 Apr 15;71(2):133-38. doi: 10.1016/0378-1097(92)90501-e.

Abstract

Five pathogenic strains each of Staphylococcus epidermidis, S. haemolyticus, S. lugdunensis and S. schleiferi were analysed by conventional electrophoresis and field inversion gel electrophoresis. For these coagulase-negative staphylococci, the restriction endonuclease SmaI emerged as the most suitable enzyme for pulsed-field electrophoresis by providing an adequate number of clearly separated DNA fragments. Field inversion gel electrophoresis confirmed the differences among strains already discriminated by conventional electrophoresis, and furthermore, differentiated strains which had previously appeared identical. Among the species that were studied, S. epidermidis showed great genomic diversity with a few common bands. On the contrary, S. haemolyticus, S. lugdunensis and S. schleiferi showed less diversity. Although these minor variations may be epidemiologically significant, this question has to be investigated on a larger number of strains.

摘要

对表皮葡萄球菌、溶血葡萄球菌、路邓葡萄球菌和施氏葡萄球菌各5株致病菌株进行了常规电泳和场反转凝胶电泳分析。对于这些凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌,限制性内切酶SmaI通过提供足够数量的清晰分离的DNA片段,成为脉冲场电泳最合适的酶。场反转凝胶电泳证实了常规电泳已区分的菌株之间的差异,此外,还区分了以前看起来相同的菌株。在所研究的菌种中,表皮葡萄球菌表现出很大的基因组多样性,只有少数共同条带。相反,溶血葡萄球菌、路邓葡萄球菌和施氏葡萄球菌的多样性较小。尽管这些微小变异可能具有流行病学意义,但这个问题必须在更多菌株上进行研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验