Lina B, Vandenesch F, Etienne J, Kreiswirth B, Fleurette J
Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Lyon, France.
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1992 Apr 15;71(2):133-38. doi: 10.1016/0378-1097(92)90501-e.
Five pathogenic strains each of Staphylococcus epidermidis, S. haemolyticus, S. lugdunensis and S. schleiferi were analysed by conventional electrophoresis and field inversion gel electrophoresis. For these coagulase-negative staphylococci, the restriction endonuclease SmaI emerged as the most suitable enzyme for pulsed-field electrophoresis by providing an adequate number of clearly separated DNA fragments. Field inversion gel electrophoresis confirmed the differences among strains already discriminated by conventional electrophoresis, and furthermore, differentiated strains which had previously appeared identical. Among the species that were studied, S. epidermidis showed great genomic diversity with a few common bands. On the contrary, S. haemolyticus, S. lugdunensis and S. schleiferi showed less diversity. Although these minor variations may be epidemiologically significant, this question has to be investigated on a larger number of strains.
对表皮葡萄球菌、溶血葡萄球菌、路邓葡萄球菌和施氏葡萄球菌各5株致病菌株进行了常规电泳和场反转凝胶电泳分析。对于这些凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌,限制性内切酶SmaI通过提供足够数量的清晰分离的DNA片段,成为脉冲场电泳最合适的酶。场反转凝胶电泳证实了常规电泳已区分的菌株之间的差异,此外,还区分了以前看起来相同的菌株。在所研究的菌种中,表皮葡萄球菌表现出很大的基因组多样性,只有少数共同条带。相反,溶血葡萄球菌、路邓葡萄球菌和施氏葡萄球菌的多样性较小。尽管这些微小变异可能具有流行病学意义,但这个问题必须在更多菌株上进行研究。