Wills T A, Vaccaro D, McNamara G
Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461.
Am J Community Psychol. 1992 Jun;20(3):349-74. doi: 10.1007/BF00937914.
Tested propositions from a model of vulnerability and protective factors with a multiethnic sample of 1,289 urban adolescents, aged 11-13 years. The criterion variable was a composite score for cigarette, alcohol, and marijuana use. Multiple regression analyses indicated that vulnerability factors (negative life events, negative affect) were related to a higher level of substance use, and protective factors (parent emotional and instrumental support, academic and adult competence, positive affect) were related to a lower level of substance use; peer competence was positively related to substance use in a multivariate model. There was a significant overall interaction of Vulnerability x Protective Factors, consistent with a stress-buffering effect. Individual interactions for Life Events x Family Support, Life Events x Competence, and Negative x Positive Affect also were consistent with buffering effects. Implications for theories of substance use and primary prevention are discussed.
对一个包含1289名年龄在11至13岁的多民族城市青少年样本的脆弱性和保护因素模型中的命题进行了检验。标准变量是香烟、酒精和大麻使用的综合得分。多元回归分析表明,脆弱性因素(负面生活事件、负面影响)与更高水平的物质使用相关,而保护因素(父母的情感和工具性支持、学业和成人能力、积极影响)与更低水平的物质使用相关;在多变量模型中,同伴能力与物质使用呈正相关。脆弱性×保护因素存在显著的总体交互作用,与压力缓冲效应一致。生活事件×家庭支持、生活事件×能力以及负面×积极影响的个体交互作用也与缓冲效应一致。文中讨论了对物质使用理论和初级预防的启示。