Monroe E W, Bernstein D I, Fox R W, Grabiec S V, Honsinger R W, Kalivas J T, Katz H I, Cuss F, Danzig M R, Garvin P R
Department of Dermatology, Milwaukee Medical Clinic, WI.
Arzneimittelforschung. 1992 Sep;42(9):1119-21.
The efficacy and safety of a new non-sedating antihistamine, loratadine (Clarityn, CAS 79794-75-5) 10 mg q.d., was compared to the classical antihistamine, hydroxyzine 25 mg t.i.d. and placebo in a 4-week (optional 12 week) randomized, double-blind, multi-center study in 203 patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria. Efficacy evaluations included weekly physician and patient assessments of pruritus, overall disease condition, and therapeutic response to treatment. Loratadine and hydroxyzine were significantly more effective than placebo and clinically comparable to each other as measured by all efficacy evaluations at each visit. Loratadine was safe and well tolerated with sedation and dry mouth similar to placebo and significantly less than hydroxyzine.
在一项针对203例慢性特发性荨麻疹患者的为期4周(可选12周)的随机、双盲、多中心研究中,将一种新型非镇静性抗组胺药氯雷他定(克敏能,CAS 79794-75-5)每日10毫克的疗效和安全性,与经典抗组胺药羟嗪每日三次、每次25毫克以及安慰剂进行了比较。疗效评估包括医生和患者每周对瘙痒、整体疾病状况以及治疗反应的评估。每次访视时通过所有疗效评估测量,氯雷他定和羟嗪均比安慰剂显著更有效,且在临床上彼此相当。氯雷他定安全且耐受性良好,镇静和口干情况与安慰剂相似,且显著少于羟嗪。