Beauchamp T L
Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
J Med Ethics. 2003 Oct;29(5):269-74. doi: 10.1136/jme.29.5.269.
The four principles approach to medical ethics plus specification is used in this paper. Specification is defined as a process of reducing the indeterminateness of general norms to give them increased action guiding capacity, while retaining the moral commitments in the original norm. Since questions of method are central to the symposium, the paper begins with four observations about method in moral reasoning and case analysis. Three of the four scenarios are dealt with. It is concluded in the "standard" Jehovah's Witness case that having autonomously chosen the authority of his religious institution, a Jehovah's Witness has a reasonable basis on which to refuse a recommended blood transfusion. The author's view of the child of a Jehovah's Witness scenario is that it is morally required-not merely permitted-to overrule this parental refusal of treatment. It is argued in the selling kidneys for transplantation scenario that a fair system of regulating and monitoring would be better than the present system which the author believes to be a shameful failure.
本文采用医学伦理的四原则方法并加以细化。细化被定义为一个减少一般规范的不确定性以增强其行动指导能力的过程,同时保留原始规范中的道德承诺。由于方法问题是本次研讨会的核心,本文首先对道德推理和案例分析中的方法进行四点观察。处理了四个场景中的三个。在“标准”耶和华见证人的案例中得出的结论是,一名耶和华见证人自主选择了其宗教机构的权威,他有合理的依据拒绝建议的输血。作者对耶和华见证人儿童场景的看法是,从道德上讲,推翻父母拒绝治疗的决定是必要的——而不仅仅是允许的。在出售肾脏用于移植的场景中,作者认为,一个公平的监管系统会比目前的系统更好,作者认为目前的系统是一个可耻的失败。