Blaxton T A
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
Mem Cognit. 1992 Sep;20(5):549-62. doi: 10.3758/bf03199587.
Deficits in conceptual transfer on both implicit and explicit memory tests were obtained for memory-impaired temporal lobe epileptic (TLE) subjects in three studies. In Experiment 1, in which a generate-read paradigm was employed, memory-impaired TLEs failed to show normal generation effects on conceptually driven tests of semantic cued recall and general knowledge questions, although their data-driven memory as measured by word-fragment completion and graphemic cued recall tasks was normal. In Experiment 2, memory-impaired patients having left temporal lobe seizure foci were tested on these four tasks and compared with nonimpaired TLEs having right temporal foci. The left TLEs showed deficits on conceptually driven tasks and normal memory for data-driven tests. These findings were extended in Experiment 3, in which left TLE patients failed to show any benefit from blocked study, as compared with random study, on category production and semantic cued-recall tests, although right TLEs and normal controls showed blocking effects on both tasks. These findings may be accommodated by a processing framework of memory in which memory-impaired patients are characterized as having deficits in conceptual, but not in data-driven, processing capabilities.
三项研究发现,记忆受损的颞叶癫痫(TLE)患者在隐式和显式记忆测试中的概念迁移均存在缺陷。在实验1中,采用生成-阅读范式,记忆受损的TLE患者在语义线索回忆和常识问题的概念驱动测试中未能表现出正常的生成效应,尽管他们在单词片段完成和字素线索回忆任务中所测量的数据驱动记忆是正常的。在实验2中,对有左侧颞叶癫痫病灶的记忆受损患者进行了这四项任务的测试,并与有右侧颞叶病灶的未受损TLE患者进行比较。左侧TLE患者在概念驱动任务中表现出缺陷,而在数据驱动测试中的记忆正常。这些发现在实验3中得到了扩展,在该实验中,与随机学习相比,左侧TLE患者在类别生成和语义线索回忆测试中未能从分组学习中获得任何益处,尽管右侧TLE患者和正常对照组在这两项任务中均表现出分组效应。这些发现可以用一种记忆处理框架来解释,在该框架中,记忆受损患者的特征是概念性处理能力存在缺陷,而数据驱动处理能力正常。