de Lange Annet H, Taris Toon W, Kompier Michiel A J, Houtman Irene L D, Bongers Paulien M
Department of Work and Organizational Psychology, University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Occup Health Psychol. 2003 Oct;8(4):282-305. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.8.4.282.
This study addressed the methodological quality of longitudinal research examining R. Karasek and T. Theorell's (1990) demand-control-(support) model and reviewed the results of the best of this research. Five criteria for evaluating methodological quality were used: type of design, length of time lags, quality of measures, method of analysis, and nonresponse analysis. These criteria were applied to 45 longitudinal studies, of which 19 (42%) obtained acceptable scores on all criteria. These high-quality studies provided only modest support for the hypothesis that especially the combination of high demands and low control results in high job strain. However, good evidence was found for lagged causal effects of work characteristics, especially for self-reported health or well-being outcomes.
本研究探讨了检验R. 卡拉塞克和T. 西奥雷尔（1990年）提出的需求-控制-（支持）模型的纵向研究的方法学质量，并回顾了该研究中最出色的结果。采用了五项评估方法学质量的标准：设计类型、时间滞后长度、测量质量、分析方法和无应答分析。这些标准应用于45项纵向研究，其中19项（42%）在所有标准上都获得了可接受的分数。这些高质量研究仅为以下假设提供了适度支持：特别是高需求与低控制的结合会导致高工作压力。然而，发现了工作特征滞后因果效应的有力证据，特别是对于自我报告的健康或幸福感结果。
