Jensen Mark P
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195-6492, USA.
Clin J Pain. 2003 Nov-Dec;19(6):345-52. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200311000-00002.
Because of the importance of pain assessment to understanding the nature and scope of pain problems, and for testing the efficacy of pain treatments, new pain measures are frequently developed. Research that describes the development and evaluation of pain measures should include detailed information concerning the validity and reliability of the measures. However, for the findings from this research to be most useful, the consumers of this research (clinicians and researchers who use pain measures) should understand the concepts of validity and reliability, and the procedures used for evaluating these in pain assessment research. The purpose of this commentary is to provide a summary of these psychometric issues, using the study and findings of Krause and Backonja as an illustrative example of the concepts.
由于疼痛评估对于理解疼痛问题的本质和范围以及测试疼痛治疗效果至关重要,新的疼痛测量方法经常被开发出来。描述疼痛测量方法的开发和评估的研究应包括有关这些测量方法的有效性和可靠性的详细信息。然而,为了使这项研究的结果最有用,这项研究的使用者(使用疼痛测量方法的临床医生和研究人员)应该理解有效性和可靠性的概念,以及在疼痛评估研究中用于评估这些概念的程序。本评论的目的是提供这些心理测量学问题的总结,以克劳斯和巴科尼亚的研究及发现作为这些概念的一个说明性例子。