• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈部疼痛与功能障碍量表的编制。项目分析、表面效度及效标关联效度。

Development of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale. Item analysis, face, and criterion-related validity.

作者信息

Wheeler A H, Goolkasian P, Baird A C, Darden B V

机构信息

Charlotte Spine Center, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Jul 1;24(13):1290-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199907010-00004.

DOI:10.1097/00007632-199907010-00004
PMID:10404569
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

The development and testing of a new comprehensive measure of neck pain and disability, the Neck Pain and Disability Scale.

OBJECTIVES

To provide an initial evaluation of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale's reliability and validity.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although several measures exist for generalized pain and disability, none is specific for neck pain. More specific measurements should improve assessment of treatments and clinical research aimed at cervical pain syndromes.

METHODS

The Neck Pain and Disability Scale was designed using the Million Visual Analogue Scale as a template and consists of 20 items that assess neck pain. In this study, 100 patients with neck pain, 52 patients with lower back and leg pain, and 27 pain-free volunteers were rated by the Neck Pain and Disability Scale. In addition, a subset of the 47 patients with neck pain were rated by several other established psychometric instruments.

RESULTS

An item analysis showed a high degree of internal consistency among the 20 items on the Neck Pain and Disability Scale (r = 0.93), and face validity was established by comparing patients who had neck pain as well as lower back and leg pain with a pain-free group. The Neck Pain and Disability Scale scores correlated with the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, the Pain Disability Index, and psychological measures of depression and neuroticism.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest a highly reliable instrument for evaluating neck pain with at least four underlying dimensions. Further work to address the predictive validity of this new tool are under way.

摘要

研究设计

一种新的颈部疼痛和功能障碍综合测量方法——颈部疼痛和功能障碍量表的开发与测试。

目的

对颈部疼痛和功能障碍量表的信度和效度进行初步评估。

背景数据总结

虽然存在多种针对全身性疼痛和功能障碍的测量方法,但没有一种是专门针对颈部疼痛的。更具针对性的测量方法应能改善针对颈部疼痛综合征的治疗评估和临床研究。

方法

颈部疼痛和功能障碍量表以百万视觉模拟量表为模板进行设计,由20个评估颈部疼痛的项目组成。在本研究中,100例颈部疼痛患者、52例腰腿痛患者和27名无疼痛志愿者接受了颈部疼痛和功能障碍量表的评分。此外,47例颈部疼痛患者的一个子集还接受了其他几种既定心理测量工具的评分。

结果

项目分析显示颈部疼痛和功能障碍量表的20个项目之间具有高度的内部一致性(r = 0.93),通过将颈部疼痛以及腰腿痛患者与无疼痛组进行比较确立了表面效度。颈部疼痛和功能障碍量表得分与奥斯威斯功能障碍问卷、疼痛功能障碍指数以及抑郁和神经质的心理测量指标相关。

结论

结果表明该量表是一种评估颈部疼痛的高度可靠工具,至少有四个潜在维度。针对这一新工具的预测效度的进一步研究正在进行中。

相似文献

1
Development of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale. Item analysis, face, and criterion-related validity.颈部疼痛与功能障碍量表的编制。项目分析、表面效度及效标关联效度。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Jul 1;24(13):1290-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199907010-00004.
2
The Neck Pain and Disability Scale: cross-cultural adaptation into German and evaluation of its psychometric properties in chronic neck pain and C1-2 fusion patients.颈部疼痛与功能障碍量表:跨文化适应为德语版本并对其在慢性颈部疼痛患者和C1-2融合患者中的心理测量学特性进行评估
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Apr 20;33(9):1018-27. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c9107.
3
Development of the Italian Version of the Neck Disability Index: cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change.《颈痛疾患指数量表(意大利语版)的研制:跨文化调适、因子分析、信度、效度及对变化的敏感性》
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Aug 1;37(17):E1038-44. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182579795.
4
Reliability and validity of the Persian versions of the fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia in patients with neck pain.颈部疼痛患者中波斯语版恐惧回避信念问卷和坦帕运动恐惧量表的信效度
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Aug 15;39(18):E1095-102. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000438.
5
Development, validity and reliability of the Italian version of the Copenhagen neck functional disability scale.哥本哈根颈部功能障碍量表意大利语版的开发、效度与信度
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Nov 23;19(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2332-z.
6
The functional rating index: reliability and validity of the Persian language version in patients with neck pain.功能评定指数:用于评估颈部疼痛患者的波斯语版本的可靠性和有效性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jun 15;37(14):E844-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824b5bde.
7
An adapted Chinese version of neck pain and disability scale: validity and reliability.颈痛与残疾量表的中文修订版:信度和效度。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Sep 15;36(20):E1322-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318209990b.
8
Reliability and validity of the finnish version of the neck disability index and the modified neck pain and disability scale.芬兰版颈部残疾指数和改良颈部疼痛和残疾量表的信度和效度。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Mar 1;35(5):552-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b327ff.
9
The Bournemouth Questionnaire: a short-form comprehensive outcome measure. II. Psychometric properties in neck pain patients.伯恩茅斯问卷:一种简短的综合结局指标。II. 颈部疼痛患者的心理测量特性。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002 Mar-Apr;25(3):141-8. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2002.123333.
10
Development and evaluation of 'neck pain and functional limitation scale': a validation study in the Asian context.“颈部疼痛与功能受限量表”的开发与评估:一项亚洲背景下的效度研究
Indian J Med Sci. 2009 Oct;63(10):445-54.

引用本文的文献

1
Structural and Psychometric Properties of Neck Pain Questionnaires Through Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Systematic Review.通过患者报告结局测量评估颈部疼痛问卷的结构和心理测量特性:一项系统评价。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 10;61(7):1254. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071254.
2
Establishing the Neck Disability Index as a Valid Tool for Assessing Persistent Neck Pain in the Albanian Population.确立颈部残疾指数作为评估阿尔巴尼亚人群持续性颈部疼痛的有效工具。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 May 22;61(6):955. doi: 10.3390/medicina61060955.
3
The impact of forward head posture on neck muscle endurance and thickness in women with chronic neck pain: a cross-sectional study.
头部前倾姿势对慢性颈痛女性颈部肌肉耐力和厚度的影响:一项横断面研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 May 13;26(1):468. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08705-w.
4
Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Persian Version of the Neck Outcome Score Questionnaire in Iranian Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain.颈部结果评分问卷波斯语版本在伊朗非特异性颈部疼痛患者中的翻译、跨文化调适、信度和效度
J Chiropr Med. 2024 Sep;23(3):127-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2024.08.004. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
5
Anterior cervical controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion (ACAF) versus Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion (ACCF) for ossification of the cervical posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) in Chinese population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.中文人群颈椎后纵韧带骨化症(OPLL)采用前路可控颈椎前移位融合术(ACAF)与前路颈椎椎体次全切除术融合术(ACCF)的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Oct 11;47(1):783. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02977-x.
6
Immersive and Nonimmersive Virtual Reality-Assisted Active Training in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.沉浸式和非沉浸式虚拟现实辅助主动训练治疗慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 19;26:e48787. doi: 10.2196/48787.
7
Sensory-motor training with virtual reality as a complementary intervention to manual therapy for persistent non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.虚拟现实感觉运动训练作为手法治疗持续性非特异性颈痛的补充干预措施:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Aug;60(4):680-690. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08115-2. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
8
Simplified Chinese version of the core outcome measures index (COMI) for patients with neck pain: cross-cultural adaptation and validation.简体中文版核心结局测量指标(COMI)用于颈痛患者:跨文化调适和验证。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Feb;33(2):386-393. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08088-3. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
9
Patient-reported outcome measures in physical therapy practice for neck pain: an overview of reviews.物理治疗实践中用于颈部疼痛的患者报告结局测量:系统评价概述。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Oct 2;7(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00637-0.
10
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Northwick park neck pain questionnaire to Urdu language.北威克颈部疼痛问卷的跨文化调适与验证至乌尔都语版。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Jun 5;24(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06586-5.