Suppr超能文献

主动脉瓣狭窄中流体机械能损失的实验分析:压力恢复的重要性

Experimental analysis of fluid mechanical energy losses in aortic valve stenosis: importance of pressure recovery.

作者信息

Heinrich R S, Fontaine A A, Grimes R Y, Sidhaye A, Yang S, Moore K E, Levine R A, Yoganathan A P

机构信息

Cardiovascular Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, School of Chemical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta 30332-0100, USA.

出版信息

Ann Biomed Eng. 1996 Nov-Dec;24(6):685-94. doi: 10.1007/BF02684181.

Abstract

Current methods for assessing the severity of aortic stenosis depend primarily on measures of maximum systolic pressure drop at the aortic valve orifice and related calculations such as valve area. It is becoming increasingly obvious, however, that the impact of the obstruction on the left ventricle is equally important in assessing its severity and could potentially be influenced by geometric factors of the valve, causing variable degrees of downstream pressure recovery. The goal of this study was to develop a method for measuring fluid mechanical energy losses in aortic stenosis that could then be directly related to the hemodynamic load placed on the left ventricle. A control volume form of conservation of energy was theoretically analyzed and modified for application to aortic valve stenosis measurements. In vitro physiological pulsatile flow experiments were conducted with different types of aortic stenosis models, including a venturi meter, a nozzle, and 21-mm Medtronic-Hall tilting disc and St. Jude bileaflet mechanical valves. The energy loss created by each model was measured for a wide range of experimental conditions, simulating physiological variation. In all cases, there was more energy lost for the nozzle (mean = 0.27 J) than for any other model for a given stroke volume. The two prosthetic valves generated approximately the same energy losses (mean = 0.18 J), which were not statistically different, whereas the venturi meter had the lowest energy loss for all conditions (mean = 0.037 J). Energy loss correlated poorly with orifice pressure drop (r2 = 0.34) but correlated well with recovered pressure drop (r2 = 0.94). However, when the valves were considered separately, orifice and recovered pressure drop were both strongly correlated with energy loss (r2 = 0.99, 0.96). The results show that recovered pressure drop, not orifice pressure drop, is directly related to the energy loss that determines pump work and therefore is a more accurate measure of the hemodynamic significance of aortic stenosis.

摘要

目前评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的方法主要依赖于主动脉瓣口最大收缩期压力阶差的测量以及相关计算,如瓣口面积。然而,越来越明显的是,在评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度时,梗阻对左心室的影响同样重要,并且可能受到瓣膜几何因素的影响,导致下游压力恢复程度不同。本研究的目的是开发一种测量主动脉瓣狭窄中流体机械能损失的方法,该方法随后可直接与左心室所承受的血流动力学负荷相关联。对能量守恒的控制体积形式进行了理论分析和修正,以应用于主动脉瓣狭窄测量。使用不同类型的主动脉瓣狭窄模型进行了体外生理性脉动流实验,包括文丘里流量计、喷嘴以及21毫米美敦力 - 霍尔倾斜盘式和圣犹达双叶机械瓣膜。在广泛的实验条件下测量了每个模型产生的能量损失,模拟了生理变化。在所有情况下,对于给定的每搏量,喷嘴产生的能量损失(平均值 = 0.27焦耳)比任何其他模型都多。两种人工瓣膜产生的能量损失大致相同(平均值 = 0.18焦耳),无统计学差异,而文丘里流量计在所有条件下能量损失最低(平均值 = 0.037焦耳)。能量损失与瓣口压力阶差相关性较差(r2 = 0.34),但与恢复压力阶差相关性良好(r2 = 0.94)。然而,当分别考虑瓣膜时,瓣口压力阶差和恢复压力阶差与能量损失均密切相关(r2 = 0.99,0.96)。结果表明,恢复压力阶差而非瓣口压力阶差与决定泵功的能量损失直接相关,因此是评估主动脉瓣狭窄血流动力学意义的更准确指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验