Suppr超能文献

六种市售系统用于鉴定弧菌科成员的准确性。

Accuracy of six commercially available systems for identification of members of the family vibrionaceae.

作者信息

O'Hara Caroline M, Sowers Evangeline G, Bopp Cheryl A, Duda Sarah B, Strockbine Nancy A

机构信息

Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Epidemiology and Laboratory Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Dec;41(12):5654-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.12.5654-5659.2003.

Abstract

Six commercially available bacterial identification products were tested with Vibrio alginolyticus (12 strains), V. cholerae (30 strains), Photobacterium (Vibrio) damselae (10 strains), V. fluvialis (10 strains), V. furnissii (4 strains), V. hollisae (10 strains), V. metschnikovii (9 strains), V. mimicus (10 strains), V. parahaemolyticus (30 strains), and V. vulnificus (10 strains) to determine the accuracy of each system for identification. The products included API 20E, Crystal E/NF, MicroScan Neg ID2 and Rapid Neg ID3, and Vitek GNI+ and ID-GNB. Each product was tested only with those species that were listed in its database. Overall, the systems correctly identified 63.9, 80.9, 63.1, 73.6, 73.5, and 77.7% of the isolates to species level, respectively. Error rates ranged from 0.8% for the API 20E to 10.4% for the Rapid Neg ID3. The API 20E gave "no identification" for 13.1% of the isolates, while the Neg ID2, GNI+, ID-GNB, and Crystal were unable to identify 1.8, 2.9, 5.0, and 6.9%, respectively. For V. cholerae, specifically, accuracy ranged from 50.0 to 96.7%, with the API 20E having the worst performance and Crystal having the best. V. fluvialis presented the biggest challenge for the API 20E and the GNI+, with probabilities averaging 10%, while V. mimicus was a major problem with the Crystal E/NF, which identified none of the strains correctly. With the Neg ID2, correct answers were often obtained only after a modified inoculation of the panel with a bacterial suspension prepared with 0.85% NaCl. Additional tests required for identification often included growth in the absence of NaCl, which is not readily available in most clinical laboratories. The only product to correctly identify at least 90% of V. cholerae strains was the Crystal E/NF, and only three of the six products, the API 20E and both of the Vitek cards, correctly identified more than 90% of the V. parahaemolyticus strains. Thus, extreme care must be taken in the interpretation of answers from these six commercially available systems for the identification of Vibrio species.

摘要

对六种市售细菌鉴定产品进行了测试,测试菌株包括溶藻弧菌(12株)、霍乱弧菌(30株)、美人鱼发光杆菌(10株)、河流弧菌(10株)、弗氏弧菌(4株)、霍氏弧菌(10株)、梅氏弧菌(9株)、拟态弧菌(10株)、副溶血性弧菌(30株)和创伤弧菌(10株),以确定每个系统的鉴定准确性。这些产品包括API 20E、Crystal E/NF、MicroScan Neg ID2和Rapid Neg ID3,以及Vitek GNI+和ID-GNB。每种产品仅针对其数据库中列出的那些菌种进行测试。总体而言,这些系统分别将63.9%、80.9%、63.1%、73.6%、73.5%和77.7%的分离株正确鉴定到种水平。错误率从API 20E的0.8%到Rapid Neg ID3的10.4%不等。API 20E对13.1%的分离株给出“无法鉴定”结果,而Neg ID2、GNI+、ID-GNB和Crystal分别无法鉴定1.8%、2.9%、5.0%和6.9%的分离株。具体来说,对于霍乱弧菌,准确率在50.0%至96.7%之间,其中API 20E性能最差,Crystal性能最佳。河流弧菌对API 20E和GNI+构成了最大挑战,平均概率为10%,而拟态弧菌是Crystal E/NF的一个主要问题,该产品没有正确鉴定出任何一株菌株。对于Neg ID2,通常只有在用0.85% NaCl制备的细菌悬液对鉴定板进行改良接种后才能获得正确答案。鉴定所需的额外测试通常包括在无NaCl条件下的生长情况,而这在大多数临床实验室中并不容易实现。唯一能正确鉴定至少90%霍乱弧菌菌株的产品是Crystal E/NF,在六种产品中,只有三种产品,即API 20E和两种Vitek卡,正确鉴定出了超过90%的副溶血性弧菌菌株。因此,在解释这六种市售系统对弧菌属菌种的鉴定结果时必须格外谨慎。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Sepsis in a 9-Month-Old Female Infant: A Case Report.一名9个月大女婴的脓毒症:病例报告
Clin Case Rep. 2024 Dec 29;13(1):e70039. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.70039. eCollection 2025 Jan.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验