• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

想象膨胀中的意象视角与源监测

Imagery perspective and source monitoring in imagination inflation.

作者信息

Libby Lisa K

机构信息

Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2003 Oct;31(7):1072-81. doi: 10.3758/bf03196128.

DOI:10.3758/bf03196128
PMID:14704022
Abstract

The present experiments suggest that imagery perspective--first person (own) versus third person (observer's)--influences source-monitoring judgments. Imagination inflation (Garry, Manning, Loftus, & Sherman, 1996) occurs when imaginary experience with events is mistaken for real experience. In Experiment 1, the perspective used to visualize real past events depended on memory test wording ("remember doing?" vs. "happened to you?"). Experiment 2 manipulated the perspective used to visually imagine counterfactual events and showed that the effect on imagination inflation depended on memory test wording. Imagination inflation was most likely when memory test wording encouraged participants to visualize real events from the same perspective as they had used to imagine counterfactual ones. Imagination inflation may result not simply from having created imaginary representations of events, but also from having created representations that match the decision criteria used in source monitoring.

摘要

目前的实验表明,意象视角——第一人称(自身)与第三人称(观察者的)——会影响源监测判断。当对事件的想象体验被误认为是真实体验时,就会出现想象膨胀(加里、曼宁、洛夫特斯和谢尔曼,1996年)。在实验1中,用于可视化真实过去事件的视角取决于记忆测试的措辞(“记得做过?”与“发生在你身上?”)。实验2操纵了用于视觉想象反事实事件的视角,并表明对想象膨胀的影响取决于记忆测试的措辞。当记忆测试措辞鼓励参与者从与他们想象反事实事件相同的视角来可视化真实事件时,想象膨胀最有可能发生。想象膨胀可能不仅源于创建了事件的想象表征,还源于创建了与源监测中使用的决策标准相匹配的表征。

相似文献

1
Imagery perspective and source monitoring in imagination inflation.想象膨胀中的意象视角与源监测
Mem Cognit. 2003 Oct;31(7):1072-81. doi: 10.3758/bf03196128.
2
Imagination inflation: a statistical artifact of regression toward the mean.想象膨胀:向均值回归的统计假象。
Mem Cognit. 2001 Jul;29(5):707-18; discussion 719-29. doi: 10.3758/bf03200473.
3
Individual differences in imagination inflation.想象膨胀中的个体差异。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1999 Jun;6(2):313-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03214120.
4
Memory distrust and imagination inflation: A registered report.记忆不信任与想象膨胀:一份注册报告。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 7;19(2):e0297774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297774. eCollection 2024.
5
Imagination perspective affects ratings of the likelihood of occurrence of autobiographical memories.想象视角会影响对自传体记忆发生可能性的评级。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Jul;150:114-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 May 25.
6
Fabrication inflation increases as source monitoring ability decreases.随着源监测能力下降,编造通胀会增加。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Feb;139(2):335-42. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.12.007. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
7
Imagination inflation in the mirror: Can imagining others' actions induce false memories of self-performance?镜子中的想象膨胀:想象他人的行为会引发对自我表现的错误记忆吗?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Jun;158:51-60. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 May 1.
8
When plausibility manipulations work: an examination of their role in the development of false beliefs and memories.当似真性操纵起作用时:对其在虚假信念和记忆发展中的作用的考察。
Memory. 2012;20(6):638-44. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2012.692797. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
9
Occurrence, plausibility, and desirability for 124 Life Events Inventory items.124项生活事件量表项目的发生率、合理性和可取性。
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Jun;47(2):529-37. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0484-9.
10
If I imagine it, then it happened: the Implicit Truth Value of imaginary representations.如果我想象它,那么它就发生了:虚构表征的内隐真值。
Cognition. 2014 Dec;133(3):517-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Memory distrust and imagination inflation: A registered report.记忆不信任与想象膨胀:一项预注册报告。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 1;20(8):e0327638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327638. eCollection 2025.
2
Memory distrust and imagination inflation: A registered report.记忆不信任与想象膨胀:一份注册报告。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 7;19(2):e0297774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297774. eCollection 2024.
3
Mistaking an Intention for a Behavior: The Case of Enacting Behavioral Decisions Versus Simply Intending to Enact Them.将意图误认为行为:实施行为决策与仅仅意图实施它们的情况。

本文引用的文献

1
Imagination inflation: Imagining a childhood event inflates confidence that it occurred.想象膨胀:想象一个童年事件会增加对该事件发生的信心。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Jun;3(2):208-14. doi: 10.3758/BF03212420.
2
Individual differences in imagination inflation.想象膨胀中的个体差异。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1999 Jun;6(2):313-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03214120.
3
Increasing confidence in remote autobiographical memory and general knowledge: extensions of the revelation effect.增强对远程自传体记忆和常识的信心:启示效应的扩展
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 Mar;47(3):455-467. doi: 10.1177/0146167220929203. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
4
Self-recognition deficits in schizophrenia patients with auditory hallucinations: a meta-analysis of the literature.精神分裂症患者伴幻听的自我识别缺陷:文献的荟萃分析。
Schizophr Bull. 2012 Jun;38(4):741-50. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbq144. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
5
I can see it both ways: first- and third-person visual perspectives at retrieval.在检索时,我可以从第一人称和第三人称视角来看待它。
Conscious Cogn. 2009 Dec;18(4):877-90. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.07.004. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
6
When the "I" looks at the "Me": autobiographical memory, visual perspective, and the self.当“我”审视“自我”:自传体记忆、视觉视角与自我。
Conscious Cogn. 2008 Dec;17(4):1386-97. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.09.001. Epub 2008 Oct 10.
Mem Cognit. 2002 Apr;30(3):432-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03194943.
4
Looking back in time: self-concept change affects visual perspective in autobiographical memory.回首往昔:自我概念的变化影响自传体记忆中的视觉视角。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Feb;82(2):167-79.
5
Imagination inflation for action events: repeated imaginings lead to illusory recollections.动作事件的想象膨胀:反复想象会导致虚幻记忆。
Mem Cognit. 1998 Jan;26(1):20-33. doi: 10.3758/bf03211367.
6
Source monitoring.源监测
Psychol Bull. 1993 Jul;114(1):3-28. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3.
7
Rate of false source attributions depends on how questions are asked.错误来源归因的比率取决于问题的提问方式。
Am J Psychol. 1993 Winter;106(4):541-57.
8
Field and observer modes of remembering.记忆的场域模式与观察者模式。
Memory. 1993 Sep;1(3):169-84. doi: 10.1080/09658219308258230.
9
Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events.对感知到的和想象出的自传体事件的记忆的现象学特征。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1988 Dec;117(4):371-6.
10
The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source.目击证人的易受暗示性效应与信息来源记忆
Mem Cognit. 1989 May;17(3):349-58. doi: 10.3758/bf03198473.