Barenfanger Joan, Lawhorn Jerry, Drake Cheryl
Memorial Medical Center, Springfield, Illinois 62781, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Jan;42(1):236-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.1.236-238.2004.
No studies have evaluated the efficacy of culturing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for fungi. Because of the facts that the most common fungi responsible for meningitis grow well in media utilized for routine bacterial cultures and that cryptococcal antigen tests are commonly ordered, the efficacy of routinely performing fungal cultures specifically to recover fungi has been questioned. We examined data from 1225 samples of CSF which were cultured for both bacteria and fungi. Twelve specimens yielded fungi, 10 from fungal cultures and 8 from bacterial cultures. Cryptococcus neoformans was found in 10 specimens, Candida albicans was found in 1, and a Cladosporium sp. was found in 1. Eight of 12 positive specimens had concordant culture results. The discordant cases were one specimen that was bacterial culture positive but fungal culture negative and three specimens that were fungal culture positive but bacterial culture negative. Of the latter discrepant cultures, one had fungal contamination only and the other two were positive for cryptococcal antigen. Therefore, omitting the fungal cultures on these specimens would not adversely impact patients. When both cryptococcal antigen tests and bacterial cultures are ordered routinely, eliminating fungal cultures on CSF would have had no impact on the patients in this study. All the clinically significant fungi were detected by the cryptococcal antigen test and/or bacterial culture. With a few exceptions, the combined use of cryptococcal antigen test and bacterial cultures of CSF could replace routine fungal cultures of CSF. Exceptions include settings where fungal pathogens other than Cryptococcus and Candida remain important causes of meningitis.
尚无研究评估脑脊液(CSF)真菌培养的疗效。鉴于导致脑膜炎的最常见真菌在常规细菌培养所用培养基中生长良好,且隐球菌抗原检测通常会被要求进行,因此专门为分离真菌而常规进行真菌培养的疗效受到质疑。我们检查了1225份同时进行细菌和真菌培养的脑脊液样本的数据。12份标本培养出真菌,其中10份来自真菌培养,8份来自细菌培养。10份标本中发现新型隐球菌,1份中发现白色念珠菌,1份中发现一种枝孢属真菌。12份阳性标本中有8份培养结果一致。不一致的情况是1份标本细菌培养阳性但真菌培养阴性,3份标本真菌培养阳性但细菌培养阴性。在后者这些有差异的培养中,1份仅有真菌污染,另外2份隐球菌抗原呈阳性。因此,对这些标本省略真菌培养不会对患者产生不利影响。当常规同时进行隐球菌抗原检测和细菌培养时,在本研究中取消脑脊液真菌培养对患者没有影响。所有具有临床意义的真菌均通过隐球菌抗原检测和/或细菌培养检测到。除了少数例外情况,脑脊液隐球菌抗原检测和细菌培养联合使用可以取代脑脊液常规真菌培养。例外情况包括除隐球菌和念珠菌以外的真菌病原体仍是脑膜炎重要病因的情况。