• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Clinician performance and prominence of diagnoses displayed by a clinical diagnostic decision support system.临床诊断决策支持系统所显示的临床医生表现及诊断突出情况。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:76-80.
2
Decision support in psychiatry - a comparison between the diagnostic outcomes using a computerized decision support system versus manual diagnosis.精神病学中的决策支持——使用计算机化决策支持系统与人工诊断的诊断结果比较。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Feb 8;8:9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-9.
3
Clinicians' roles and necessary levels of understanding in the use of artificial intelligence: A qualitative interview study with German medical students.临床医生在使用人工智能方面的角色和必要的理解水平:一项对德国医学生的定性访谈研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Oct 7;25(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01109-w.
4
Improved patient satisfaction and diagnostic accuracy in skin diseases with a Visual Clinical Decision Support System-A feasibility study with general practitioners.基于可视化临床决策支持系统提高皮肤病患者满意度和诊断准确性:一项全科医生参与的可行性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 29;15(7):e0235410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235410. eCollection 2020.
5
Improving decision accuracy using a clinical decision support system for medical students during history-taking: a randomized clinical trial.利用临床决策支持系统提高医学生问诊决策准确性的随机临床试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 May 25;23(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04370-6.
6
The influence of a decision support system on the differential diagnosis of medical practitioners at three levels of training.决策支持系统对三个培训水平的医学从业者鉴别诊断的影响。
Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1996:219-23.
7
Clinician views on how clinical decision support systems can help diagnose asthma in primary care: a qualitative study.临床医生对临床决策支持系统如何帮助初级保健诊断哮喘的看法:一项定性研究。
J Asthma. 2024 Apr;61(4):377-385. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2023.2280839. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
8
Computerised decision support systems in order communication for diagnostic, screening or monitoring test ordering: systematic reviews of the effects and cost-effectiveness of systems.计算机决策支持系统在诊断、筛查或监测检验申请方面的交流应用:系统的效果和成本效益的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Oct;14(48):1-227. doi: 10.3310/hta14480.
9
Tracing the Progression of Sepsis in Critically Ill Children: Clinical Decision Support for Detection of Hematologic Dysfunction.追踪危重症患儿脓毒症的进展:用于检测血液功能障碍的临床决策支持。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Oct;13(5):1002-1014. doi: 10.1055/a-1950-9637. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
10
Computer-aided DSM-IV-diagnostics - acceptance, use and perceived usefulness in relation to users' learning styles.计算机辅助的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版诊断——与用户学习风格相关的接受度、使用情况及感知有用性
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005 Jan 7;5:1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-5-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Roadmap for the evolution of monitoring: developing and evaluating waveform-based variability-derived artificial intelligence-powered predictive clinical decision support software tools.监测发展路线图:开发和评估基于波形变异性的人工智能驱动的预测性临床决策支持软件工具。
Crit Care. 2024 Dec 5;28(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05140-6.
2
Human-artificial intelligence interaction in gastrointestinal endoscopy.胃肠内镜检查中的人机交互
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Mar 16;16(3):126-135. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i3.126.
3
Effects of a Differential Diagnosis List of Artificial Intelligence on Differential Diagnoses by Physicians: An Exploratory Analysis of Data from a Randomized Controlled Study.人工智能鉴别诊断列表对医生鉴别诊断的影响:一项随机对照研究数据的探索性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 23;18(11):5562. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115562.
4
Rare disease diagnosis: A review of web search, social media and large-scale data-mining approaches.罕见病诊断:网络搜索、社交媒体及大规模数据挖掘方法综述
Rare Dis. 2015 Sep 16;3(1):e1083145. doi: 10.1080/21675511.2015.1083145. eCollection 2015.
5
Description and pilot evaluation of the Metabolic Irregularities Narrowing down Device software: a case analysis of physician programming.代谢异常缩小装置软件的描述与初步评估:医师编程的案例分析
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2015 Feb 3;5(1):25793. doi: 10.3402/jchimp.v5.25793. eCollection 2015.
6
Using value of information to guide evaluation of decision supports for differential diagnosis: is it time for a new look?利用信息价值来指导对鉴别诊断决策支持的评估:是时候重新审视了吗?
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Sep 11;13:105. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-105.
7
Use of health information technology to reduce diagnostic errors.利用健康信息技术减少诊断错误。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct;22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii40-ii51. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001884. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
8
Automation bias: a systematic review of frequency, effect mediators, and mitigators.自动化偏差:频率、影响中介和缓解因素的系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jan-Feb;19(1):121-7. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000089. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
9
It is time to talk about people: a human-centered healthcare system.现在是时候谈谈人了:以人为本的医疗体系。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2010 Nov 26;8:35. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-8-35.
10
Are residents' decisions influenced more by a decision aid or a specialist's opinion? A randomized controlled trial.居民的决策更多地受到决策辅助工具还是专家意见的影响?一项随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Apr;25(4):316-20. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1251-y. Epub 2010 Jan 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.《不确定性下的判断:启发式与偏差》
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
2
The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.神奇的数字七,加二或减二:我们信息处理能力的某些局限。
Psychol Rev. 1956 Mar;63(2):81-97.
3
Preventing exacerbation of an ADE with automated decision support.通过自动化决策支持预防药物不良反应的加重。
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2002 Fall;16(4):44-9.
4
Comparison of measures to assess change in diagnostic performance due to a decision support system.用于评估决策支持系统导致的诊断性能变化的测量方法比较。
Proc AMIA Symp. 2000:532-6.
5
Effects of computerized physician order entry on prescribing practices.计算机化医嘱录入对处方开具行为的影响。
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Oct 9;160(18):2741-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.18.2741.
6
Enhancement of clinicians' diagnostic reasoning by computer-based consultation: a multisite study of 2 systems.基于计算机的会诊对临床医生诊断推理能力的提升:两个系统的多中心研究
JAMA. 1999 Nov 17;282(19):1851-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.19.1851.
7
Effects of a decision support system on physicians' diagnostic performance.决策支持系统对医生诊断性能的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999 Sep-Oct;6(5):420-7. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1999.0060420.
8
Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.基于计算机的临床决策支持系统对医生绩效和患者结局的影响:一项系统评价。
JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1339-46. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.15.1339.
9
Performance of four computer-based diagnostic systems.四种基于计算机的诊断系统的性能。
N Engl J Med. 1994 Jun 23;330(25):1792-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199406233302506.

临床诊断决策支持系统所显示的临床医生表现及诊断突出情况。

Clinician performance and prominence of diagnoses displayed by a clinical diagnostic decision support system.

作者信息

Berner Eta S, Maisiak Richard S, Heuderbert Gustavo R, Young K Randall

机构信息

University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA.

出版信息

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:76-80.

PMID:14728137
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1480080/
Abstract

Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) can impact both diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making, but physicians sometimes fail to heed the appropriate CDSS advice, or become influenced in a negative way by the CDSS. This study examined the relationships among clinicians' prior diagnostic accuracy, the performance of a diagnostic CDSS, and how the CDSS influenced the accuracy of the clinician's subsequent diagnoses. Results showed that (1) clinicians who already were considering the correct diagnosis prior to using the CDSS were more likely to get the CDSS to produce the correct diagnosis in a prominent position than those not considering it initially; (2) physicians are strongly anchored by their initial diagnoses prior to using the CDSS; and (3) changes in the clinicians' diagnoses after using the CDSS are related to presence or absence of the correct diagnosis in the top 10 diagnoses displayed by the CDSS.

摘要

临床决策支持系统(CDSS)会对诊断和治疗决策产生影响,但医生有时会忽视CDSS给出的恰当建议,或者受到CDSS的负面影响。本研究考察了临床医生先前的诊断准确性、诊断性CDSS的性能,以及CDSS如何影响临床医生后续诊断的准确性之间的关系。结果表明:(1)在使用CDSS之前就已经在考虑正确诊断的临床医生,比最初未考虑正确诊断的临床医生更有可能让CDSS在显著位置给出正确诊断;(2)医生在使用CDSS之前会强烈依赖其初始诊断;(3)临床医生在使用CDSS后的诊断变化与CDSS显示的前10个诊断中是否存在正确诊断有关。