Suppr超能文献

钙通道阻滞剂(硝苯地平、地尔硫䓬和维拉帕米)对氧化型低密度脂蛋白对培养的淋巴细胞毒性的保护作用。

Protection by Ca2+ channel blockers (nifedipine, diltiazem and verapamil) against the toxicity of oxidized low density lipoprotein to cultured lymphoid cells.

作者信息

Nègre-Salvayre A, Salvayre R

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry, University Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

Br J Pharmacol. 1992 Nov;107(3):738-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1992.tb14516.x.

Abstract
  1. Ca2+ channel blockers from 3 different chemical classes (diltiazem, verapamil and nifedipine) were compared in their ability to inhibit low density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation and to protect cells directly against the cytotoxicity of oxidized LDL. 2. LDL oxidation promoted either by u.v. radiations or by copper ions was inhibited by nifedipine (IC50 of 10 +/- 2 and 4 +/- 0.5 mumol l-1, respectively) whereas diltiazem and verapamil were only poorly active or completely ineffective. As expected, LDL protected from oxidation by nifedipine (nifedipine/oxidized LDL) were much less cytotoxic than (unprotected) oxidized LDL (or than LDL oxidized in the presence of diltiazem or verapamil). The cytotoxic effect correlated well with the lipid peroxidation derivatives measured as the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) content of LDL oxidized in the presence of Ca2+ channel blockers, which suggests that the antioxidant effect of Ca2+ channel blockers protected cells indirectly from the cytotoxic effect of oxidized LDL. 3. Nifedipine also exhibited a direct cytoprotective effect against the cytotoxicity of oxidized LDL as demonstrated by incubating cells in the presence of unprotected oxidized LDL and nifedipine (IC50 of 1 +/- 0.2 mumol l-1), whereas diltiazem and verapamil did not exhibit any significant protective effect. At the concentrations used, the protective effect of nifedipine was not due to inhibition of LDL uptake by Ca2+ channel blockers. 4. The direct protective activity of nifedipine is probably unrelated to its antioxidant properties since it did not inhibit the cellular TBARS evoked by oxidized LDL taken up by the cells, in contrast to vitamin E. 5. Nifedipine (and diltiazem to a lesser extent) inhibited the slow [Ca2+]J rise induced by oxidized LDL and the subsequent cytotoxicity.6. It is proposed that relatively high concentrations of nifedipine (unlike diltiazem and verapamil)protect cultured lymphoid cells against the cytotoxicity of oxidized LDL by two different mechanisms:(i) an antioxidant effect inhibiting LDL oxidation (outside the cell); (ii) a direct cytoprotective effect (at lower concentrations), the mechanism of which is unknown. These data could explain in part the mechanism of action of nifedipine in the prevention of cellular damage potentially involved in atherogenesis.
摘要
  1. 比较了3种不同化学类别的钙通道阻滞剂(地尔硫䓬、维拉帕米和硝苯地平)抑制低密度脂蛋白(LDL)氧化以及直接保护细胞免受氧化LDL细胞毒性作用的能力。2. 硝苯地平可抑制紫外线辐射或铜离子诱导的LDL氧化(IC50分别为10±2和4±0.5μmol/L),而地尔硫䓬和维拉帕米活性很低或完全无效。正如预期的那样,经硝苯地平保护免受氧化的LDL(硝苯地平/氧化LDL)的细胞毒性远低于(未受保护的)氧化LDL(或在存在地尔硫䓬或维拉帕米的情况下氧化的LDL)。细胞毒性效应与以钙通道阻滞剂存在下氧化LDL的硫代巴比妥酸反应性物质(TBARS)含量衡量的脂质过氧化衍生物密切相关,这表明钙通道阻滞剂的抗氧化作用间接保护细胞免受氧化LDL的细胞毒性作用。3. 如在未受保护的氧化LDL和硝苯地平存在下培养细胞所证明的,硝苯地平对氧化LDL的细胞毒性也表现出直接的细胞保护作用(IC50为1±0.2μmol/L),而地尔硫䓬和维拉帕米未表现出任何显著的保护作用。在所使用的浓度下,硝苯地平的保护作用并非由于钙通道阻滞剂抑制LDL摄取所致。4. 硝苯地平的直接保护活性可能与其抗氧化特性无关,因为与维生素E不同,它并未抑制细胞摄取氧化LDL所诱发的细胞TBARS。5. 硝苯地平(地尔硫䓬程度较轻)抑制氧化LDL诱导的缓慢的[Ca2+]J升高以及随后的细胞毒性。6. 有人提出,相对高浓度的硝苯地平(与地尔硫䓬和维拉帕米不同)通过两种不同机制保护培养的淋巴细胞免受氧化LDL的细胞毒性作用:(i)抗氧化作用抑制LDL氧化(在细胞外);(ii)直接的细胞保护作用(在较低浓度下),其机制尚不清楚。这些数据可以部分解释硝苯地平在预防可能参与动脉粥样硬化形成的细胞损伤中的作用机制。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
A fluorescence NK assay using flow cytometry.一种使用流式细胞术的荧光自然杀伤细胞检测法。
J Immunol Methods. 1986 Jan 22;86(1):7-15. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(86)90258-9.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验