Corzana Francisco, Motawia Mohammed S, Du Penhoat Catherine Hervé, Perez Serge, Tschampel Sarah M, Woods Robert J, Engelsen Søren B
Food Technology, Department of Dairy and Food Science, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Rolighedsvej 30, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
J Comput Chem. 2004 Mar;25(4):573-86. doi: 10.1002/jcc.10405.
The hydration behavior of two model disaccharides, methyl-alpha-D-maltoside (1) and methyl-alpha-D-isomaltoside (2), has been investigated by a comparative 10 ns molecular dynamics study. The detailed hydration of the two disaccharides was described using three force fields especially developed for modeling of carbohydrates in explicit solvent. To validate the theoretical results the two compounds were synthesized and subjected to 500 MHz NMR spectroscopy, including pulsed field gradient diffusion measurements (1: 4.0. 10(-6) cm(2). s(-1); 2: 4.2. 10(-6) cm(2). s(-1)). In short, the older CHARMM-based force field exhibited a more structured carbohydrate-water interaction leading to better agreement with the diffusional properties of the two compounds, whereas especially the alpha-(1-->6) linkage and the primary hydroxyl groups were inaccurately modeled. In contrast, the new generation of the CHARMM-based force field (CSFF) and the most recent version of the AMBER-based force field (GLYCAM-2000a) exhibited less structured carbohydrate-water interactions with the result that the diffusional properties of the two disaccharides were underestimated, whereas the simulations of the alpha-(1-->6) linkage and the primary hydroxyl groups were significantly improved and in excellent agreement with homo- and heteronuclear coupling constants. The difference between the two classes of force field (more structured and less structured carbohydrate-water interaction) was underlined by calculation of the isotropic hydration as calculated by radial pair distributions. At one extreme, the radial O em leader O pair distribution function yielded a peak density of 2.3 times the bulk density in the first hydration shell when using the older CHARMM force field, whereas the maximum density observed in the GLYCAM force field was calculated to be 1.0, at the other extreme.
通过一项比较性的10纳秒分子动力学研究,对两种模型二糖,即α-D-甲基麦芽糖苷(1)和α-D-甲基异麦芽糖苷(2)的水合行为进行了研究。使用专门为在显式溶剂中模拟碳水化合物而开发的三种力场,描述了这两种二糖的详细水合情况。为了验证理论结果,合成了这两种化合物并对其进行了500兆赫核磁共振光谱分析,包括脉冲场梯度扩散测量(1:4.0×10⁻⁶厘米²·秒⁻¹;2:4.2×10⁻⁶厘米²·秒⁻¹)。简而言之,较旧的基于CHARMM的力场表现出更具结构的碳水化合物 - 水相互作用,这导致与这两种化合物的扩散性质更吻合,然而特别是α-(1→6)键和伯羟基的模拟不准确。相比之下,新一代基于CHARMM的力场(CSFF)和最新版本的基于AMBER的力场(GLYCAM - 2000a)表现出结构较少的碳水化合物 - 水相互作用,结果是这两种二糖的扩散性质被低估,而α-(1→6)键和伯羟基的模拟得到了显著改善,并且与同核和异核耦合常数非常吻合。通过径向对分布计算的各向同性水合作用突出了这两类力场(结构较多和结构较少的碳水化合物 - 水相互作用)之间的差异。在一个极端情况下,当使用较旧的CHARMM力场时,径向O…O对分布函数在第一个水合层中产生的峰密度是本体密度的2.3倍,而在GLYCAM力场中观察到的最大密度在另一个极端情况下计算为1.0。