• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马萨诸塞州镇级特征与吸烟政策的采用:当地餐厅吸烟规定是否加剧了健康保护方面的差异?

Town-level characteristics and smoking policy adoption in Massachusetts: are local restaurant smoking regulations fostering disparities in health protection?

作者信息

Skeer Margie, George Sarah, Hamilton William L, Cheng Debbie M, Siegel Michael

机构信息

Social and Behavioral Sciences Department, Boston University School of Public Health, MA 02118, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2004 Feb;94(2):286-92. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.2.286.

DOI:10.2105/ajph.94.2.286
PMID:14759944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1448245/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We identified and quantified differences in sociodemographic characteristics of communities relative to the strength of local restaurant smoking regulations in Massachusetts.

METHODS

We examined the relationship between the strength of the 351 local restaurant smoking regulations in Massachusetts and a number of town-level characteristics, using a multinomial logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Characteristics important to the adoption of stronger restaurant smoking regulations included higher education and per capita income, geographic region, voter support for a state cigarette tax initiative, board of health funding to promote clean indoor air policy making, and the presence of a bordering town with a strong regulation.

CONCLUSIONS

The current pattern of smoke-free restaurant policy enactment fosters socioeconomic and geographic disparities in health protection, undermining an important national health goal.

摘要

目标

我们确定并量化了马萨诸塞州社区社会人口特征相对于当地餐厅吸烟规定强度的差异。

方法

我们使用多项逻辑回归模型,研究了马萨诸塞州351项当地餐厅吸烟规定的强度与一些城镇层面特征之间的关系。

结果

对采用更强的餐厅吸烟规定重要的特征包括高等教育和人均收入、地理区域、选民对州香烟税倡议的支持、促进清洁室内空气政策制定的卫生委员会资金,以及存在有严格规定的毗邻城镇。

结论

目前无烟餐厅政策的颁布模式加剧了健康保护方面的社会经济和地理差异,破坏了一项重要的国家健康目标。

相似文献

1
Town-level characteristics and smoking policy adoption in Massachusetts: are local restaurant smoking regulations fostering disparities in health protection?马萨诸塞州镇级特征与吸烟政策的采用:当地餐厅吸烟规定是否加剧了健康保护方面的差异?
Am J Public Health. 2004 Feb;94(2):286-92. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.2.286.
2
Effect of local restaurant smoking regulations on environmental tobacco smoke exposure among youths.当地餐厅吸烟规定对青少年接触环境烟草烟雾的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2004 Feb;94(2):321-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.2.321.
3
The descriptive epidemiology of local restaurant smoking regulations in Massachusetts: an analysis of the protection of restaurant customers and workers.马萨诸塞州当地餐厅吸烟规定的描述性流行病学:对餐厅顾客和员工保护情况的分析
Tob Control. 2003 Jun;12(2):221-6. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.2.221.
4
Local restaurant smoking policy enactment in Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州地方餐厅吸烟政策的颁布。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Jan;5(1):63-73. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199901000-00010.
5
The economic effect of smoke-free restaurant policies on restaurant business in Massachusetts.无烟餐厅政策对马萨诸塞州餐厅生意的经济影响。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Jan;5(1):53-62. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199901000-00009.
6
Effect of local restaurant smoking regulations on progression to established smoking among youths.当地餐厅吸烟规定对青少年发展为固定吸烟者的影响。
Tob Control. 2005 Oct;14(5):300-6. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.012302.
7
Effects of restaurant and bar smoking regulations on exposure to environmental tobacco smoke among Massachusetts adults.餐厅和酒吧吸烟规定对马萨诸塞州成年人接触环境烟草烟雾的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2004 Nov;94(11):1959-64. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.11.1959.
8
Local restaurant smoking regulations and the adolescent smoking initiation process: results of a multilevel contextual analysis among Massachusetts youth.当地餐厅吸烟规定与青少年吸烟起始过程:马萨诸塞州青少年多层次情境分析结果
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 May;162(5):477-83. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.162.5.477.
9
Diffusion of local restaurant smoking regulations in Massachusetts: identifying disparities in health protection for population subgroups.马萨诸塞州当地餐厅吸烟规定的传播:确定不同人群亚组在健康保护方面的差异。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2006 May-Jun;12(3):262-9. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200605000-00007.
10
Relation between local restaurant smoking regulations and attitudes towards the prevalence and social acceptability of smoking: a study of youths and adults who eat out predominantly at restaurants in their town.当地餐厅吸烟规定与对吸烟流行率及社会可接受性的态度之间的关系:一项针对主要在其所在城镇餐厅外出就餐的青少年和成年人的研究。
Tob Control. 2004 Dec;13(4):347-55. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.007336.

引用本文的文献

1
Illuminating a Path Forward for Tobacco Nation: Projected Impacts of Recommended Policies on Geographic Disparities.为烟草“国度”照亮前行之路:推荐政策对地理差异的预期影响
Tob Use Insights. 2023 Sep 19;16:1179173X231182473. doi: 10.1177/1179173X231182473. eCollection 2023.
2
Area-Level Predictors of Tobacco 21 Coverage in the U.S. Before the National Law: Exploring Potential Disparities.美国全国性法律出台前烟草21岁准入年龄覆盖范围的地区层面预测因素:探索潜在差异
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Jan;60(1):29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.06.026. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
3
Differential Relationship between Tobacco Control Policies and U.S. Adult Current Smoking by Poverty.烟草控制政策与贫困程度对美国成年当前吸烟率的差异关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 26;16(21):4130. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214130.
4
Uneven Access to Smoke-Free Laws and Policies and Its Effect on Health Equity in the United States: 2000-2019.美国无烟法律和政策的不平等获取及其对健康公平性的影响:2000-2019 年。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Nov;109(11):1568-1575. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305289. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
5
Key Factors Inhibiting Legislative Progress Toward Smoke-Free Coverage in Appalachia.阿巴拉契亚地区无烟保险覆盖立法进展的关键因素。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Mar;108(3):372-378. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304244. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
6
Change in Neighborhood Disadvantage and Change in Smoking Behaviors in Adults: A Longitudinal, Within-individual Study.邻里劣势的变化与成年人吸烟行为的变化:一项纵向个体内研究。
Epidemiology. 2016 Nov;27(6):803-9. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000530.
7
The Effects of Workplace Clean Indoor Air Law Coverage on Workers' Smoking-Related Outcomes.工作场所清洁室内空气法覆盖范围对工人与吸烟相关结果的影响。
Health Econ. 2017 Feb;26(2):226-242. doi: 10.1002/hec.3288. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
8
Sociodemographic Disparities in Local Smoke-Free Law Coverage in 10 States.10个州地方无烟法律覆盖范围中的社会人口统计学差异
Am J Public Health. 2015 Sep;105(9):1806-13. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302655. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
9
Addressing the Social Determinants of Health to Reduce Tobacco-Related Disparities.解决健康的社会决定因素以减少烟草相关的差异。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Aug;17(8):892-7. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu266. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
10
Strong smoke-free law coverage in the United States by race/ethnicity: 2000-2009.美国按种族/族裔划分的强有力无烟法律覆盖范围:2000-2009 年。
Am J Public Health. 2013 May;103(5):e62-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301045. Epub 2013 Mar 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Household tobacco smoke exposure is negatively associated with premenopausal bone mass.家庭烟草烟雾暴露与绝经前骨量呈负相关。
Osteoporos Int. 2002 Aug;13(8):663-8. doi: 10.1007/s001980200090.
2
Local enactment of tobacco control policies in Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州烟草控制政策的地方立法。
Am J Public Health. 2002 Jun;92(6):941-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.6.941.
3
Local restaurant smoking policy enactment in Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州地方餐厅吸烟政策的颁布。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Jan;5(1):63-73. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199901000-00010.
4
The economic effect of smoke-free restaurant policies on restaurant business in Massachusetts.无烟餐厅政策对马萨诸塞州餐厅生意的经济影响。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Jan;5(1):53-62. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199901000-00009.
5
Health effects of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. California Environmental Protection Agency.接触环境烟草烟雾对健康的影响。加利福尼亚环境保护局。
Tob Control. 1997 Winter;6(4):346-53. doi: 10.1136/tc.6.4.346.
6
Preemption in tobacco control. Review of an emerging public health problem.烟草控制中的优先事项。对一个新出现的公共卫生问题的综述。
JAMA. 1997 Sep 10;278(10):858-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.278.10.858.
7
The tobacco industry, state politics, and tobacco education in California.加利福尼亚州的烟草行业、州政治与烟草教育
Am J Public Health. 1993 Sep;83(9):1214-21. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.9.1214.
8
The politics of antismoking legislation.反吸烟立法的政治因素
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1993 Winter;18(4):787-819.
9
Legislating clean air. Politics, pre-emption, and the health of the public.制定清洁空气法规。政治、优先权与公众健康。
N C Med J. 1995 Jan;56(1):14-9.
10
Coffee and pancreatic cancer. The problems of etiologic science and epidemiologic case-control research.
JAMA. 1981 Aug 28;246(9):957-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.246.9.957.