• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于测量关节炎患者自我报告疾病活动度的网络兼容仪器。

A web-compatible instrument for measuring self-reported disease activity in arthritis.

作者信息

Athale Ninad, Sturley Ann, Skoczen Steven, Kavanaugh Arthur, Lenert Leslie

机构信息

Health Services Research and Development, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, Veterans Medical Research Foundation, University of California, San Diego (UCSD), California 92161, USA.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 2004 Feb;31(2):223-8.

PMID:14760788
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe a Web-based computer health assessment survey for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to evaluate the survey in comparison with current paper versions.

METHODS

Utilizing data from a study on RA, we compared results from 43 patients attending a university-based clinic who were each given a paper and a demonstration computer version of a patient self-assessment questionnaire including multiple-choice questions from a multi-dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ); visual analog scales (VAS) for pain, fatigue, and global disease severity; and a tender and swollen joint count reporting tool. Patients were given optional followup surveys to determine their opinion of the computer program.

RESULTS

High correlations (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9) were seen across methods for the 10-item HAQ and psychological distress scores and the VAS scores for pain and global disease severity. Moderate correlation was observed for the self-efficacy scores, the VAS scores for fatigue, and tender joint counts. The data also revealed a small shift in the mean scores for the HAQ and self-efficacy questions, with patients reporting slightly higher scores on the computer instrument. Overall, patient opinions of the uniquely designed joint count tool were good, with 71% of responding patients answering favorably.

CONCLUSION

Web-based computer versions of patient self-assessment surveys in RA are comparable to paper versions, and their use in clinics or over the Internet could dramatically facilitate the ability of physicians to monitor patients' health.

摘要

目的

描述一项针对类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的基于网络的计算机健康评估调查,并与当前的纸质版本进行比较评估该调查。

方法

利用一项关于RA的研究数据,我们比较了43名在大学诊所就诊的患者的结果,这些患者每人都收到了一份纸质版和一份演示计算机版的患者自我评估问卷,问卷包括来自多维健康评估问卷(HAQ)的多项选择题;疼痛、疲劳和整体疾病严重程度的视觉模拟量表(VAS);以及一个压痛和肿胀关节计数报告工具。患者可选择接受后续调查以确定他们对计算机程序的看法。

结果

在10项HAQ、心理困扰评分以及疼痛和整体疾病严重程度的VAS评分方面,不同方法之间呈现出高度相关性(组内相关系数>0.9)。自我效能感评分、疲劳的VAS评分以及压痛关节计数观察到中度相关性。数据还显示,HAQ和自我效能感问题的平均得分有小幅变化,患者在计算机工具上报告的得分略高。总体而言,患者对独特设计的关节计数工具的评价良好,71%的回应患者给出了肯定回答。

结论

RA患者自我评估调查的基于网络的计算机版本与纸质版本相当,在诊所或通过互联网使用它们可以极大地促进医生监测患者健康的能力。

相似文献

1
A web-compatible instrument for measuring self-reported disease activity in arthritis.一种用于测量关节炎患者自我报告疾病活动度的网络兼容仪器。
J Rheumatol. 2004 Feb;31(2):223-8.
2
Preliminary evaluation of a visual analog function scale for use in rheumatoid arthritis.用于类风湿性关节炎的视觉模拟功能量表的初步评估。
J Rheumatol. 2005 Jul;32(7):1261-6.
3
Time to score quantitative rheumatoid arthritis measures: 28-Joint Count, Disease Activity Score, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Multidimensional HAQ (MDHAQ), and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID) scores.类风湿关节炎定量指标的评分时间:28个关节计数、疾病活动评分、健康评估问卷(HAQ)、多维健康评估问卷(MDHAQ)以及患者指数数据常规评估(RAPID)评分。
J Rheumatol. 2008 Apr;35(4):603-9. Epub 2008 Mar 1.
4
Test-retest reliability of patient global assessment and physician global assessment in rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎患者总体评估和医生总体评估的重测信度。
J Rheumatol. 2009 Oct;36(10):2178-82. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090084. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
5
An open-source, self-explanatory touch screen in routine care. Validity of filling in the Bath measures on Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, Function Index, the Health Assessment Questionnaire and Visual Analogue Scales in comparison with paper versions.一种开源、自解释的常规护理触摸屏。在填写强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数、功能指数、健康评估问卷和视觉模拟量表时,与纸质版本相比,填写巴斯量表的有效性。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 Jan;49(1):99-104. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep333. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
6
Self-assessment of disease activity by patients with rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎患者对疾病活动度的自我评估。
J Rheumatol. 1996 Sep;23(9):1531-8.
7
Validation of patient-reported joint counts in rheumatoid arthritis and the role of training.类风湿关节炎患者自我报告的关节计数的验证及培训的作用。
J Rheumatol. 2007 Jun;34(6):1261-5. Epub 2007 Apr 15.
8
Performance of health status measures with a pen based personal digital assistant.使用基于笔的个人数字助理进行健康状况测量的性能。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Oct;64(10):1480-4. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.030437. Epub 2005 Apr 20.
9
Touch-screen computer systems in the rheumatology clinic offer a reliable and user-friendly means of collecting quality-of-life and outcome data from patients with rheumatoid arthritis.风湿病诊所中的触摸屏计算机系统提供了一种可靠且用户友好的方式,用于收集类风湿性关节炎患者的生活质量和治疗结果数据。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006 Jan;45(1):66-71. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kei100. Epub 2005 Nov 1.
10
Comment on the use of self-reporting instruments to assess patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the longitudinal association between the DAS28 and the VAS general health.关于使用自我报告工具评估类风湿性关节炎患者的评论:疾病活动评分28(DAS28)与视觉模拟量表(VAS)总体健康状况之间的纵向关联
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Oct 15;55(5):745-50. doi: 10.1002/art.22225.

引用本文的文献

1
Measurement Comparability of Electronic and Paper Administration of Visual Analogue Scales: A Review of Published Studies.电子和纸质视觉模拟量表管理的测量可比性:已发表研究综述。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 May;56(3):394-404. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00376-2. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
2
Electronic Data Capture Versus Conventional Data Collection Methods in Clinical Pain Studies: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.临床疼痛研究中电子数据采集与传统数据收集方法的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 16;22(6):e16480. doi: 10.2196/16480.
3
An electronic patient-reported outcomes measurement system in paediatric orthopaedics.
小儿骨科中的电子患者报告结局测量系统。
J Child Orthop. 2019 Aug 1;13(4):431-437. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.13.190053.
4
Accuracy, Validity, and Reliability of an Electronic Visual Analog Scale for Pain on a Touch Screen Tablet in Healthy Older Adults: A Clinical Trial.健康老年人触摸屏平板电脑上电子视觉模拟疼痛量表的准确性、有效性和可靠性:一项临床试验
Interact J Med Res. 2016 Jan 14;5(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.4910.
5
Validation of Portuguese-translated computer touch-screen questionnaires in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis, compared with paper formats.类风湿关节炎和脊柱关节炎患者中葡萄牙语翻译的计算机触摸屏问卷与纸质问卷形式的验证比较。
Rheumatol Int. 2015 Dec;35(12):2029-35. doi: 10.1007/s00296-015-3347-5. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
6
The comparison of paper- and web-based questionnaires in patients with hand and upper extremity illness.纸质问卷与网络问卷在手部及上肢疾病患者中的比较。
Hand (N Y). 2013 Jun;8(2):210-4. doi: 10.1007/s11552-013-9511-z.
7
Feasibility of using a handheld electronic device for the collection of patient reported outcomes data from children.使用手持电子设备收集儿童患者自我报告结局数据的可行性。
J Commun Disord. 2012 Jan-Feb;45(1):12-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
8
Definition of nonresponse to analgesic treatment of arthritic pain: an analytical literature review of the smallest detectable difference, the minimal detectable change, and the minimal clinically important difference on the pain visual analog scale.关节炎疼痛镇痛治疗无反应的定义:关于疼痛视觉模拟量表上最小可检测差异、最小可检测变化及最小临床重要差异的分析性文献综述
Int J Inflam. 2011;2011:231926. doi: 10.4061/2011/231926. Epub 2011 May 5.
9
Can the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score produce reliable results when used online?多伦多四肢挽救评分在线使用时能否得出可靠结果?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jun;469(6):1750-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1715-8. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
10
Feasibility of internet-based health-related quality of life data collection in a large patient cohort.在大型患者队列中基于互联网收集健康相关生活质量数据的可行性。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Aug 19;12(3):e35. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1214.