Coignard Catherine, Hurst Steven F, Benjamin Lynette E, Brandt Mary E, Warnock David W, Morrison Christine J
Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Feb;42(2):858-61. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.2.858-861.2004.
Candida species bloodstream isolates were collected from institutions participating in an active, population-based surveillance for candidemia. Species identifications were performed locally and then confirmed at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) by phenotype-based methods. Discrepancies in species identification between the referring institution and the CDC were noted for 43 of 935 isolates (4.6%). A DNA probe-based species identification system (PCR-enzyme immunoassay [EIA]) was then used to resolve these discrepancies. The PCR-EIA result was identical to the CDC phenotypic identification method for 98% of the isolates tested. The most frequently misidentified species was Candida glabrata (37% of all discrepant identifications). Such misidentifications could lead to the administration of inappropriate therapy given the propensity of C. glabrata to develop resistance to azole antifungal drugs.
念珠菌属血流分离株是从参与一项针对念珠菌血症的积极的、基于人群的监测的机构收集的。菌种鉴定在当地进行,然后由疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)通过基于表型的方法进行确认。在935株分离株中,有43株(4.6%)在转诊机构和CDC之间的菌种鉴定存在差异。然后使用基于DNA探针的菌种鉴定系统(PCR-酶免疫测定法[EIA])来解决这些差异。对于98%的测试分离株,PCR-EIA结果与CDC表型鉴定方法一致。最常被错误鉴定的菌种是光滑念珠菌(在所有差异鉴定中占37%)。鉴于光滑念珠菌易于对唑类抗真菌药物产生耐药性,这种错误鉴定可能导致给予不适当的治疗。