Suppr超能文献

使用DNA探针解决念珠菌属物种鉴定结果不一致的问题。

Resolution of discrepant results for Candida species identification by using DNA probes.

作者信息

Coignard Catherine, Hurst Steven F, Benjamin Lynette E, Brandt Mary E, Warnock David W, Morrison Christine J

机构信息

Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Feb;42(2):858-61. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.2.858-861.2004.

Abstract

Candida species bloodstream isolates were collected from institutions participating in an active, population-based surveillance for candidemia. Species identifications were performed locally and then confirmed at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) by phenotype-based methods. Discrepancies in species identification between the referring institution and the CDC were noted for 43 of 935 isolates (4.6%). A DNA probe-based species identification system (PCR-enzyme immunoassay [EIA]) was then used to resolve these discrepancies. The PCR-EIA result was identical to the CDC phenotypic identification method for 98% of the isolates tested. The most frequently misidentified species was Candida glabrata (37% of all discrepant identifications). Such misidentifications could lead to the administration of inappropriate therapy given the propensity of C. glabrata to develop resistance to azole antifungal drugs.

摘要

念珠菌属血流分离株是从参与一项针对念珠菌血症的积极的、基于人群的监测的机构收集的。菌种鉴定在当地进行,然后由疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)通过基于表型的方法进行确认。在935株分离株中,有43株(4.6%)在转诊机构和CDC之间的菌种鉴定存在差异。然后使用基于DNA探针的菌种鉴定系统(PCR-酶免疫测定法[EIA])来解决这些差异。对于98%的测试分离株,PCR-EIA结果与CDC表型鉴定方法一致。最常被错误鉴定的菌种是光滑念珠菌(在所有差异鉴定中占37%)。鉴于光滑念珠菌易于对唑类抗真菌药物产生耐药性,这种错误鉴定可能导致给予不适当的治疗。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验