• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从门罗到莫罗:面部命名错误分析

From Monroe to Moreau: an analysis of face naming errors.

作者信息

Brédart S, Valentine T

机构信息

Cognitive Neuropsychology Unit, University of Louvain, Belgium.

出版信息

Cognition. 1992 Dec;45(3):187-223. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90017-c.

DOI:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90017-c
PMID:1490322
Abstract

Functional models of face recognition and speech production have developed separately. However, naming a familiar face is, of course, an act of speech production. In this paper we propose a revision of Bruce and Young's (1986) model of face processing, which incorporates two features of Levelt's (1989) model of speech production. In particular, the proposed model includes two stages of lexical access for names and monitoring of face naming based on a "perceptual loop". Two predictions were derived from the perceptual loop hypothesis of speech monitoring: (1) naming errors in which a (correct) rare surname is erroneously replaced by a common surname should occur more frequently than the reverse substitution (the error asymmetry effect); (2) naming errors in which a common surname is articulated are more likely to be repaired than errors which result in articulation of a rare surname (the error-repairing effect). Both predictions were supported by an analysis of face naming errors in a laboratory face naming task. In a further experiment we considered the possibility that the effects of surname frequency observed in face naming errors could be explained by the frequency sensitivity of lexical access in speech production. However, no effect of the frequency of the surname of the faces used in the previous experiment was found on face naming latencies. Therefore, it is concluded that the perceptual loop hypothesis provides the more parsimonious account of the entire pattern of the results.

摘要

人脸识别和言语产生的功能模型是分别发展起来的。然而,说出一张熟悉面孔的名字,当然是一种言语产生行为。在本文中,我们提议对布鲁斯和扬(1986)的面部加工模型进行修订,该修订纳入了莱尔特(1989)言语产生模型的两个特征。具体而言,所提出的模型包括名字词汇通达的两个阶段以及基于“感知环路”对面部命名的监控。从言语监控的感知环路假设得出了两个预测:(1)将一个(正确的)罕见姓氏错误地替换为常见姓氏的命名错误,应该比相反的替换(错误不对称效应)更频繁地出现;(2)说出常见姓氏的命名错误比导致说出罕见姓氏的错误更有可能得到纠正(错误纠正效应)。这两个预测都得到了一项实验室面部命名任务中面部命名错误分析的支持。在进一步的实验中,我们考虑了在面部命名错误中观察到的姓氏频率效应可能由言语产生中词汇通达的频率敏感性来解释的可能性。然而,在前一个实验中使用的面孔的姓氏频率,对面部命名潜伏期没有影响。因此,得出的结论是,感知环路假设为整个结果模式提供了更简洁的解释。

相似文献

1
From Monroe to Moreau: an analysis of face naming errors.从门罗到莫罗:面部命名错误分析
Cognition. 1992 Dec;45(3):187-223. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90017-c.
2
Naming faces and naming names: exploring an interactive activation model of person recognition.识别面孔与叫出名字:探索一种人物识别的交互激活模型。
Memory. 1993 Dec;1(4):457-80. doi: 10.1080/09658219308258248.
3
Semantic and phonological context effects in speech error repair.言语错误修复中的语义和语音语境效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Sep;31(5):921-32. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.921.
4
Naming very familiar people: when retrieving names is faster than retrieving semantic biographical information.说出非常熟悉之人的名字:当检索名字比检索语义性生平信息更快时。
Br J Psychol. 2005 May;96(Pt 2):205-14. doi: 10.1348/000712605X38378.
5
An appreciation of Bruce and Young's (1986) serial stage model of face naming after 25 years.对 Bruce 和 Young(1986)提出的面孔命名的连续阶段模型 25 年后的评价。
Br J Psychol. 2011 Nov;102(4):915-30. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02032.x. Epub 2011 May 24.
6
An interactive activation model of face naming.一种面部命名的交互激活模型。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1995 May;48(2):466-86. doi: 10.1080/14640749508401400.
7
Facial identity and facial speech processing: familiar faces and voices in the McGurk effect.面部身份与面部言语加工:麦格克效应中的熟悉面孔与声音
Percept Psychophys. 1995 Nov;57(8):1124-33. doi: 10.3758/bf03208369.
8
Does naming accuracy improve through self-monitoring of errors?通过自我监控错误,命名准确性会提高吗?
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Apr;84:272-81. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.027. Epub 2016 Feb 7.
9
Retrieval of names in face and object naming in an interference study.干扰研究中面孔与物体命名任务里名字的提取
Memory. 2006 May;14(4):400-14. doi: 10.1080/09658210500419966.
10
The "BIG BIRD" of the "YELLOW YOUNG" man: do nontarget properties cascade?“黄种年轻人”的“大鸟”:非目标属性会级联吗?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(4):763-84. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.828317. Epub 2013 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Taxonomic Interference Associated with Phonemic Paraphasias in Agrammatic Primary Progressive Aphasia.语法性原发性进行性失语中与音位错语相关的分类干扰。
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Apr 14;30(4):2529-2541. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz258.
2
The Similarities Between the Target and the Intruder in Naturally Occurring Person Naming Errors: A Comparison Between Repeated and Single Naming Confusions.自然发生的人名命名错误中目标与干扰项的相似性:重复命名混淆与单次命名混淆的比较
J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Feb;48(1):33-42. doi: 10.1007/s10936-018-9586-3.
3
Similarities between the target and the intruder in naturally occurring repeated person naming errors.
自然发生的重复性人名错误中目标与干扰项之间的相似性。
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 29;6:1474. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01474. eCollection 2015.
4
Parents accidentally substitute similar sounding sibling names more often than dissimilar names.父母更常意外地用发音相似的兄弟姐妹的名字来替代那些发音不相似的名字。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 31;8(12):e84444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084444. eCollection 2013.
5
Is naming faces different from naming objects? Semantic interference in a face- and object-naming task.面部命名与物体命名有区别吗?面部和物体命名任务中的语义干扰。
Mem Cognit. 2014 Apr;42(3):525-37. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0376-8.
6
On the relationship between reading, listening and speaking: it's different for people's names.关于阅读、听力和口语之间的关系:人名的情况有所不同。
Mem Cognit. 1998 Jul;26(4):740-53. doi: 10.3758/bf03211394.