Sheldon C D, King K, Cock H, Wilkinson P, Barnes N C
Department of Thoracic Medicine, Royal London Hospital.
Thorax. 1992 Dec;47(12):1015-8. doi: 10.1136/thx.47.12.1015.
Notification of tuberculosis is essential for local contact tracing and for assessing the national incidence of tuberculosis. The accuracy of notification figures is uncertain. This study examined the notification rates of all patients diagnosed as having tuberculosis at two hospitals in the East End of London over five years.
In a retrospective survey of all patients aged 16 years or more presenting with tuberculosis to the London Chest Hospital or the Royal London Hospital from 1 January 1985 to 31 December 1989, cases of tuberculosis were identified from microbiology and histology records, statutory notifications, necropsy reports, coroners' records, hospital activity data, and death certificates. Clinical data were obtained from case notes and notification was determined from the local authority notification lists.
Six hundred and nine adult patients with tuberculosis were identified. Notes were available for 580 cases (95%), of which 426 (73%) had been notified. The proportion of cases notified varied according to the specialty of the clinician in charge of the patient at diagnosis. Patients with a past history of tuberculosis and those who died within one year were less likely to have had their tuberculosis notified. Age, race, and lack of microbial or histological confirmation of diagnosis did not influence the proportion of cases notified. One hundred and eighty five patients had smear positive sputum, but 25 of these cases (14%) were not notified. Eighty five patients who had presented with pulmonary tuberculosis did not have their disease notified; 20 (24%) had smear positive sputum.
Many cases of tuberculosis are not notified (27%). Fourteen per cent of all sputum smear positive cases of tuberculosis were not notified, and these patients are a considerable public health risk. The true incidence of tuberculosis in the area studied is at least one third higher than current notification figures suggest.
结核病通报对于本地接触者追踪以及评估全国结核病发病率至关重要。通报数字的准确性尚不确定。本研究调查了伦敦东区两家医院在五年内所有被诊断患有结核病患者的通报率。
在一项对1985年1月1日至1989年12月31日期间向伦敦胸科医院或皇家伦敦医院就诊的所有16岁及以上结核病患者的回顾性调查中,从微生物学和组织学记录、法定通报、尸检报告、验尸官记录、医院活动数据及死亡证明中识别出结核病病例。临床数据从病历中获取,通报情况则根据地方当局通报清单确定。
共识别出609例成年结核病患者。580例(95%)有病历记录,其中426例(73%)已被通报。通报病例的比例因诊断时负责患者的临床医生专业不同而有所差异。有结核病既往史的患者以及在一年内死亡的患者被通报结核病的可能性较小。年龄、种族以及缺乏微生物或组织学诊断确诊并未影响通报病例的比例。185例患者痰涂片呈阳性,但其中25例(14%)未被通报。85例肺结核患者的病情未被通报;其中20例(24%)痰涂片呈阳性。
许多结核病病例未被通报(27%)。所有痰涂片阳性结核病病例中有14%未被通报,这些患者构成相当大的公共卫生风险。所研究地区结核病的实际发病率至少比当前通报数字显示的高1/3。