• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在“每日五蔬果健康饮食”研究中,通过工作场所和家庭来增加水果和蔬菜的摄入量。

Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption through worksites and families in the treatwell 5-a-day study.

作者信息

Sorensen G, Stoddard A, Peterson K, Cohen N, Hunt M K, Stein E, Palombo R, Lederman R

机构信息

Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Control, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1999 Jan;89(1):54-60. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.1.54.

DOI:10.2105/ajph.89.1.54
PMID:9987465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1508509/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We report on the results of the Treatwell 5-a-Day study, a worksite intervention aimed at increasing consumption of fruits and vegetables.

METHODS

Twenty-two worksites were randomly assigned to 3 groups: (1) a minimal intervention control group, (2) a worksite intervention, and (3) a worksite-plus-family intervention. The interventions used community-organizing strategies and were structured to target multiple levels of influence, following a socioecological model. Data were collected by self-administered employee surveys before and after the intervention; the response rate was 87% (n = 1359) at baseline and 76% (n = 1306) at follow-up. A process tracking system was used to document intervention delivery.

RESULTS

After control for worksite, gender, education, occupation, race/ethnicity, and living situation, total fruit and vegetable intake increased by 19% in the worksite-plus-family group, 7% in the worksite intervention group and 0% in the control group (P = .05). These changes reflect a one half serving increase among workers in the worksite-plus-family group compared with the control group (P = .018).

CONCLUSIONS

The worksite-plus-family intervention was more successful in increasing fruit and vegetable consumption than was the worksite intervention. Worksite interventions involving family members appear to be a promising strategy for influencing workers' dietary habits.

摘要

目的

我们报告了“每日五蔬果”治疗研究的结果,这是一项旨在增加水果和蔬菜摄入量的工作场所干预措施。

方法

22个工作场所被随机分为3组:(1)最小干预对照组,(2)工作场所干预组,(3)工作场所加家庭干预组。干预措施采用社区组织策略,并按照社会生态模型进行构建,以针对多个影响层面。在干预前后通过员工自行填写的调查问卷收集数据;基线时的回复率为87%(n = 1359),随访时为76%(n = 1306)。使用了一个过程跟踪系统来记录干预措施的实施情况。

结果

在对工作场所、性别、教育程度、职业、种族/族裔和生活状况进行控制后,工作场所加家庭干预组的水果和蔬菜总摄入量增加了19%,工作场所干预组增加了7%,对照组增加了0%(P = .05)。与对照组相比,这些变化反映出工作场所加家庭干预组的工人摄入量增加了半份(P = .018)。

结论

工作场所加家庭干预在增加水果和蔬菜摄入量方面比工作场所干预更成功。涉及家庭成员的工作场所干预似乎是影响工人饮食习惯的一种有前景的策略。

相似文献

1
Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption through worksites and families in the treatwell 5-a-day study.在“每日五蔬果健康饮食”研究中,通过工作场所和家庭来增加水果和蔬菜的摄入量。
Am J Public Health. 1999 Jan;89(1):54-60. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.1.54.
2
Worksite and family education for dietary change: the Treatwell 5-a-Day program.通过工作场所和家庭教育改变饮食习惯:“每日五蔬果”健康促进计划。
Health Educ Res. 1998 Dec;13(4):577-91. doi: 10.1093/her/13.4.577.
3
Seattle 5 a Day worksite program to increase fruit and vegetable consumption.西雅图“每日五蔬果”工作场所项目,旨在增加蔬果摄入量。
Prev Med. 2001 Mar;32(3):230-8. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0806.
4
The effects of a controlled worksite environmental intervention on determinants of dietary behavior and self-reported fruit, vegetable and fat intake.一项可控的工作场所环境干预对饮食行为决定因素以及自我报告的水果、蔬菜和脂肪摄入量的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2006 Oct 17;6:253. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-253.
5
Process tracking results from the Treatwell 5-a-Day Worksite Study.来自“每日五蔬果工作场所研究”的过程追踪结果。
Am J Health Promot. 2000 Jan-Feb;14(3):179-87. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-14.3.179.
6
Mediating factors in dietary change: understanding the impact of a worksite nutrition intervention.饮食变化的中介因素:理解工作场所营养干预的影响。
Health Educ Behav. 2000 Feb;27(1):112-25. doi: 10.1177/109019810002700110.
7
Worksite-based research and initiatives to increase fruit and vegetable consumption.基于工作场所的研究以及增加水果和蔬菜摄入量的倡议。
Prev Med. 2004 Sep;39 Suppl 2:S94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.12.020.
8
Long-term sustainability of a worksite canteen intervention of serving more fruit and vegetables.工作场所食堂增加供应水果和蔬菜干预措施的长期可持续性。
Public Health Nutr. 2010 Oct;13(10):1647-52. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010001242. Epub 2010 May 6.
9
Nutrition education effective in increasing fruit and vegetable consumption among overweight and obese adults.营养教育可有效增加超重和肥胖成年人的水果和蔬菜摄入量。
Appetite. 2016 May 1;100:94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
10
The Australian National Workplace Health Project: design and baseline findings.澳大利亚国家工作场所健康项目:设计与基线调查结果
Prev Med. 2000 Sep;31(3):249-60. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0707.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of a Food Education Program for healthcare workers: a pilot study in a Total Worker Health© approach.一项针对医护人员的食品教育计划的效果:采用全面职工健康理念的试点研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 12;13:1523131. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1523131. eCollection 2025.
2
Precision prevention in occupational health: a conceptual analysis and development of a unified understanding and an integrative framework.精准预防在职业健康中的应用:概念分析及统一理解和综合框架的构建。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 18;12:1444521. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1444521. eCollection 2024.
3
Comparison of Health Behaviors of Healthcare Workers and the General Public in Israel: A Cross-Sectional Survey.以色列医护人员与公众健康行为比较:一项横断面调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Feb 27;21(3):268. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030268.
4
Group Randomized Trial of Healthy Eating and Gardening Intervention in Navajo Elementary Schools (Yéego!).纳瓦霍族小学健康饮食与园艺干预群组随机试验(Yéego!)
AJPM Focus. 2022 Sep 16;1(2):100033. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2022.100033. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Evaluation of a workplace weight management program based on WeChat platform for obese/overweight people in China using the RE-AIM framework.运用RE-AIM框架对中国肥胖/超重人群基于微信平台的职场体重管理项目进行评估。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Jun 5;34:102275. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102275. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
Development of an Assessment Tool to Measure Healthy Eating in Navajo Children and Their Families.开发一种评估工具以衡量纳瓦霍族儿童及其家庭的健康饮食情况。
Curr Dev Nutr. 2023 Apr 1;7(5):100074. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.100074. eCollection 2023 May.
7
Environmental Pollutants and Oxidative Stress in Terrestrial and Aquatic Organisms: Examination of the Total Picture and Implications for Human Health.陆地和水生生物中的环境污染物与氧化应激:全面审视及对人类健康的影响
Front Physiol. 2022 Jul 22;13:931386. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.931386. eCollection 2022.
8
Work site food purchases among healthcare staff: Relationship with healthy eating and opportunities for intervention.医护人员工作场所的食物购买行为:与健康饮食的关系及干预机会。
Nutr Diet. 2022 Apr;79(2):265-271. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12724. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
9
Can Community Gardens with Workshops Increase Gardening Behavior? A Navajo Wellness Collaboration.设有工作坊的社区花园能否增加园艺行为?一项纳瓦霍族健康合作项目。
J Health Dispar Res Pract. 2021 Summer;14(2):64-76.
10
Effectiveness of workplace wellness programmes for dietary habits, overweight, and cardiometabolic health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.工作场所健康促进计划对饮食习惯、超重和心血管代谢健康的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Sep;6(9):e648-e660. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00140-7.

本文引用的文献

1
The health impact of worksite nutrition and cholesterol intervention programs.工作场所营养与胆固醇干预项目对健康的影响。
Am J Health Promot. 1996 Jul-Aug;10(6):453-70. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-10.6.453.
2
Worksite fitness and exercise programs: a review of methodology and health impact.工作场所健身与锻炼计划:方法学及健康影响综述
Am J Health Promot. 1996 Jul-Aug;10(6):436-52. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-10.6.436.
3
The effects of the child and adolescent trial for cardiovascular health intervention on psychosocial determinants of cardiovascular disease risk behavior among third-grade students.儿童和青少年心血管健康干预试验对三年级学生心血管疾病风险行为的心理社会决定因素的影响。
Am J Health Promot. 1996 Jan-Feb;10(3):217-25. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-10.3.217.
4
Ecological foundations of health promotion.健康促进的生态基础。
Am J Health Promot. 1996 Mar-Apr;10(4):270-81. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-10.4.270.
5
A model for worksite cancer prevention: integration of health protection and health promotion in the WellWorks Project.一个工作场所癌症预防模型:在“健康工作项目”中将健康保护与健康促进相结合。
Am J Health Promot. 1995 Sep-Oct;10(1):55-62. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-10.1.55.
6
Fruit and vegetable intake in the United States: the baseline survey of the Five A Day for Better Health Program.美国的水果和蔬菜摄入量:“每日五份,健康更佳”计划的基线调查
Am J Health Promot. 1995 May-Jun;9(5):352-60. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-9.5.352.
7
Employee advisory boards as a vehicle for organizing worksite health promotion programs.员工咨询委员会作为组织工作场所健康促进计划的一种手段。
Am J Health Promot. 1992 Jul-Aug;6(6):443-50, 464. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-6.6.443.
8
Implications of the results of community intervention trials.社区干预试验结果的意义
Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:379-416. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.379.
9
Cost-effectiveness of populationwide educational approaches to reduce serum cholesterol levels.降低血清胆固醇水平的全人群教育方法的成本效益
Circulation. 1997 Jan 7;95(1):24-30. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.1.24.
10
The effect of adult participation in a school-based family intervention to improve Children's diet and physical activity: the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health.成人参与以学校为基础的家庭干预对改善儿童饮食和身体活动的影响:儿童和青少年心血管健康试验
Prev Med. 1996 Jul-Aug;25(4):455-64. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1996.0077.