Suppr超能文献

评估多发性硬化症中的疲劳:荷兰改良疲劳影响量表。

Assessing fatigue in multiple sclerosis: Dutch modified fatigue impact scale.

作者信息

Kos Daphne, Kerckhofs Eric, Nagels Guy, D'Hooghe Bie D, Duquet William, Duportail Marijke, Ketelaer Pierre

机构信息

Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Department of Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation Research, Laarbeeklaan 103, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Acta Neurol Belg. 2003 Dec;103(4):185-91.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale. Fifty-one randomly selected subjects with definite multiple sclerosis (MS) (mean age 51.9 +/- 10.5 years, 25 women) and 20 healthy controls (mean age 50.6 +/- 14.0 years, 13 women) filled in the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the fatigue subscale of Guy's Neurological Disability Scale (GNDS). All tests were repeated with an interval of maximum three days. The hospitalised individuals with MS (n = 20) were assessed at intake and discharge. No significant difference was found between first and second administration of MFIS (z = -.519, p = .603, Wilcoxon signed ranks test), with a good correlation (.729). MFIS was able to distinguish individuals with MS from controls, and subjects with fatigue from the non-fatigued group. MFIS showed no floor or ceiling effect. MFIS correlated moderately with Fatigue Severity Scale (.447) and the fatigue subscale of GNDS (.487). The 20 hospitalised subjects had significant lower MFIS scores (z = -3.401, p = .001) after a four-week rehabilitation programme, whereas the FSS did not change. This study indicates that the Dutch version of the MFIS is a reliable, valid and responsive tool to assess the impact of MS-related fatigue on daily life.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估荷兰语版改良疲劳影响量表的信度、效度和反应度。随机选取51名确诊为多发性硬化症(MS)的受试者(平均年龄51.9±10.5岁,25名女性)和20名健康对照者(平均年龄50.6±14.0岁,13名女性),填写改良疲劳影响量表(MFIS)、疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)和盖伊神经功能障碍量表(GNDS)的疲劳分量表。所有测试间隔最长为三天重复进行。对住院的MS患者(n = 20)在入院时和出院时进行评估。MFIS首次和第二次施测之间未发现显著差异(z = -0.519,p = 0.603,Wilcoxon符号秩检验),相关性良好(.729)。MFIS能够区分MS患者和对照者,以及疲劳者和非疲劳者。MFIS未显示出地板效应或天花板效应。MFIS与疲劳严重程度量表(.447)和GNDS的疲劳分量表(.487)呈中度相关。20名住院受试者在进行为期四周的康复计划后,MFIS评分显著降低(z = -3.401,p = 0.001),而FSS没有变化。本研究表明,荷兰语版的MFIS是一种可靠、有效且具有反应度的工具,可用于评估与MS相关的疲劳对日常生活的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验