Bond Lyndal, Thomas Lyndal, Coffey Carolyn, Glover Sara, Butler Helen, Carlin John B, Patton George
Centre for Adolescent Health, 2 Gatehouse St., Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia.
J Sch Health. 2004 Jan;74(1):23-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb06597.x.
This study examined the impact of a school-based preventive intervention on cannabis use in adolescence, using a cluster-randomized trial of a multilevel intervention aimed at improving social relationships within schools by promoting change in school environment. Four waves of data were collected at baseline (1997, Year 8: mean age 13 years) and six, 18, and 30 months later (1999, Year 10: mean age 16 years). Self-reported substance use, school engagement, and sociodemographic data were collected using computer-administered questionnaires. Some 2.678(74%) Year 8 students participated (wave 1) with minimal attrition (10% by wave 4). Adjusting for baseline use, weak evidence existed for an intervention effect on the prevalence of any use at Year 10 (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.54, 1.05) and incident weekly use (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.39, 1.33). These effects were reduced after adjusting for confounders. Moderate evidence suggested an interaction effect between intervention group and tobacco use (p = 0.04), suggesting the intervention was more effective for non-smokers at baseline (Adj. OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.26, 0.98). This study indicates that a multi-level school-based program may provide an innovative direction for sustainable school interventions with the potential to reduce substance use.
本研究采用一项整群随机试验,对一项旨在通过促进学校环境变化来改善学校内社会关系的多层次干预措施,考察其对青少年大麻使用情况的影响。在基线期(1997年,八年级:平均年龄13岁)以及此后的6个月、18个月和30个月(1999年,十年级:平均年龄16岁)收集了四轮数据。使用计算机管理的问卷收集自我报告的物质使用情况、学校参与度和社会人口统计学数据。约2678名(74%)八年级学生参与了研究(第1波),损耗极小(到第4波时为10%)。在对基线使用情况进行调整后,有微弱证据表明干预措施对十年级时任何物质使用的患病率有影响(比值比0.75,95%置信区间0.54, 1.05)以及对每周偶尔使用的情况有影响(比值比0.72,95%置信区间0.39, 1.33)。在对混杂因素进行调整后,这些影响有所减弱。中等证据表明干预组与烟草使用之间存在交互作用(p = 0.04),这表明该干预措施对基线时的非吸烟者更有效(调整后的比值比0.50,95%置信区间0.26, 0.98)。本研究表明,一项基于学校的多层次项目可能为可持续的学校干预措施提供一个创新方向,具有减少物质使用的潜力。