Müller U, Roeder C, Dubs L, Duetz M S, Greenough C G
Institute for Evaluative Research in Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 35, P.O. Box 8354, 3001 Bern, Switzerland.
Eur Spine J. 2004 Jul;13(4):314-24. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0666-0. Epub 2004 Mar 17.
A literature review of the most widely used, condition-specific, self-administered assessment questionnaires for low back pain has been undertaken. In part I, technical issues such as validity, reliability, availability and comparability were analyzed for the nine most widely used outcome tools. This second part focuses on the content and wording of questions and answers in each of the nine questionnaires, and an analysis of the different score results is performed. The issue of score bias is discussed and suggestions are given in order to increase the construct validity in the practical use of the individual questionnaires.
我们对最广泛使用的针对腰痛的特定病情自我管理评估问卷进行了文献综述。在第一部分，我们分析了九种最广泛使用的结果工具的有效性、可靠性、可用性和可比性等技术问题。第二部分重点关注这九份问卷中每个问卷的问题及答案的内容和措辞，并对不同的评分结果进行分析。我们讨论了评分偏差问题，并给出了相关建议，以提高各问卷在实际使用中的结构效度。
