腰痛的特定病情结局指标。第二部分：量表构建。
Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part II: scale construction.
作者信息
Müller U, Roeder C, Dubs L, Duetz M S, Greenough C G
机构信息
Institute for Evaluative Research in Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 35, P.O. Box 8354, 3001 Bern, Switzerland.
出版信息
Eur Spine J. 2004 Jul;13(4):314-24. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0666-0. Epub 2004 Mar 17.
Abstract
A literature review of the most widely used, condition-specific, self-administered assessment questionnaires for low back pain has been undertaken. In part I, technical issues such as validity, reliability, availability and comparability were analyzed for the nine most widely used outcome tools. This second part focuses on the content and wording of questions and answers in each of the nine questionnaires, and an analysis of the different score results is performed. The issue of score bias is discussed and suggestions are given in order to increase the construct validity in the practical use of the individual questionnaires.
摘要
我们对最广泛使用的针对腰痛的特定病情自我管理评估问卷进行了文献综述。在第一部分，我们分析了九种最广泛使用的结果工具的有效性、可靠性、可用性和可比性等技术问题。第二部分重点关注这九份问卷中每个问卷的问题及答案的内容和措辞，并对不同的评分结果进行分析。我们讨论了评分偏差问题，并给出了相关建议，以提高各问卷在实际使用中的结构效度。
相似文献
1
Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part II: scale construction.腰痛的特定病情结局指标。第二部分：量表构建。
Eur Spine J. 2004 Jul;13(4):314-24. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0666-0. Epub 2004 Mar 17.
2
Back related outcome assessment instruments.背部相关结局评估工具。
Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S25-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1054-8. Epub 2005 Nov 16.
3
Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part I: validation.腰痛的特定病情结局指标。第一部分：验证
Eur Spine J. 2004 Jul;13(4):301-13. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0665-1. Epub 2004 Mar 17.
4
Low back pain: what determines functional outcome at six months? An observational study.腰痛：什么决定了六个月时的功能结局？一项观察性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Oct 13;11:236. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-236.
5
Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change.解读下腰痛患者疼痛和功能状态的变化分数：迈向关于最小重要变化的国际共识。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 1;33(1):90-4. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3a10.
6
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Hungarian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for the back (COMI Back).背部核心结局测量指数（COMI Back）匈牙利语版本的跨文化适应与验证
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jan;25(1):257-264. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3750-8. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
7
Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Properties of the Hausa Versions of the Numerical Pain Rating Scale and Global Rating of Change Scale in a Low-literate Population With Chronic Low Back Pain.将数字疼痛评分量表和全球变化评分量表的豪萨语版本翻译成低识字率慢性腰痛人群的简体中文，并进行翻译、跨文化适应性和心理测量特性研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Apr 15;45(8):E439-E447. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003306.
8
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Norwegian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for low back pain.跨文化调适与验证挪威版腰痛核心结局测量指标。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Dec;21(12):2539-49. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2393-x. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
9
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Slovenian version of the Core outcome measures index for low back pain.跨文化调适与验证斯洛文尼亚版腰痛核心结局测量指标。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Apr 13;21(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03280-8.
10
Development of a standard set of outcome measures for non-specific low back pain in Dutch primary care physiotherapy practices: a Delphi study.制定荷兰初级保健物理治疗实践中非特异性下腰痛的标准结局测量集：一项德尔菲研究。
Eur Spine J. 2019 Jul;28(7):1550-1564. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05962-x. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
引用本文的文献
1
The Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Better Reflects the Impact of Length of Stay and the Occurrence of Complications Within 90 Days Than Legacy Outcome Measures for Lumbar Degenerative Surgery.与传统的腰椎退行性疾病手术结局指标相比，患者报告结局测量信息系统（PROMIS）能更好地反映住院时间和90天内并发症发生情况的影响。
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Feb;15(1):82-86. doi: 10.14444/8011. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
2
Applying the WHO ICF Framework to the Outcome Measures Used in the Evaluation of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Coronavirus Outbreaks.将世界卫生组织国际功能、残疾和健康分类（ICF）框架应用于冠状病毒爆发中长期临床结局评估中使用的结局测量指标。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 5;17(18):6476. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186476.
3
Real-World Massage Therapy Produces Meaningful Effectiveness Signal for Primary Care Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: Results of a Repeated Measures Cohort Study.真实世界的按摩疗法对慢性下背痛的初级保健患者产生有意义的疗效信号：一项重复测量队列研究的结果。
Pain Med. 2017 Jul 1;18(7):1394-1405. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw347.
4
An Outcome Measure of Functionality and Pain in Patients with Low Back Disorder: A Validation Study of the Iranian version of Low Back Outcome Score.下背部疾病患者功能与疼痛的一项结局指标：伊朗版下背部结局评分的效度研究
Asian Spine J. 2016 Aug;10(4):719-27. doi: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.4.719. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
5
Reliability and validity study on the Hungarian versions of the oswestry disability index and the Quebec back pain disability scale.《匈牙利版 Oswestry 残疾指数和魁北克腰痛残疾量表的信度和效度研究》
Eur Spine J. 2013 May;22(5):1010-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2645-9. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
6
The assessment of symptoms and functional limitations in low back pain patients: validity and reliability of a new questionnaire.下腰痛患者症状及功能受限情况的评估：一份新问卷的效度与信度
Eur Spine J. 2007 Nov;16(11):1799-811. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0405-z. Epub 2007 Jun 22.
7
Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients.下腰痛患者疼痛和残疾评定工具的反应度及最小临床重要差异
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 Oct 25;7:82. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-82.
8
Danish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Part 1: Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity in two different populations.用于腰痛患者的丹麦版奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数。第1部分：在两个不同人群中的跨文化调适、信度和效度。
Eur Spine J. 2006 Nov;15(11):1705-16. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0117-9. Epub 2006 May 31.
9
Danish version of the Oswestry disability index for patients with low back pain. Part 2: Sensitivity, specificity and clinically significant improvement in two low back pain populations.用于腰痛患者的丹麦版奥斯威斯功能障碍指数。第2部分：两个腰痛人群的敏感性、特异性及临床显著改善情况。
Eur Spine J. 2006 Nov;15(11):1717-28. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0128-6. Epub 2006 May 31.
10
Work-related outcome assessment instruments.与工作相关的结果评估工具。
Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S32-43. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1047-7. Epub 2005 Nov 23.
本文引用的文献
1
Assessment of disability with the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.采用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版对强直性脊柱炎患者的残疾情况进行评估。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Feb;62(2):140-5. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.2.140.
2
Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in clinical practice.《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》（ICF）在临床实践中的应用。
Disabil Rehabil. 2002 Mar 20;24(5):281-2. doi: 10.1080/09638280110105222.
3
The ICIDH-2: developments for a new era of outcomes research.《国际功能、残疾和健康分类第二版》：成果研究新时代的进展
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Dec;81(12 Suppl 2):S10-4. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.20616.
4
Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations.脊柱疾病治疗评估中的结果评估：总结与一般建议
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3100-3. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00003.
5
[The patient as expert--introduction to evidence-based orthopedics].
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2000 Jul-Aug;138(4):289-94. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-10150.
6
[Everything was done--patient still not satisfied: introduction to evidence-based surgery].
Swiss Surg. 1999;5(4):160-6. doi: 10.1024/1023-9332.5.4.160.
7
EuroQol: the current state of play.欧洲生活质量量表：当前进展情况
Health Policy. 1996 Jul;37(1):53-72. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6.
8
Theorie und Erfahrung in der Medizin: Orthodoxe Wissenschaft und ganzheitliche Kybernetik.
Forsch Komplementarmed. 1998;5 Suppl S1:52-59. doi: 10.1159/000057109.
9
Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use.腰痛研究的结果测量。标准化使用建议。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Sep 15;23(18):2003-13. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199809150-00018.
10
[Minimum requirements in medical expert assessment of occupational disability of patients with chronic nonspecific pain].
Versicherungsmedizin. 1997 Aug 1;49(4):118-25.
Zotero 插件