Towner Jonathan S, Rollin Pierre E, Bausch Daniel G, Sanchez Anthony, Crary Sharon M, Vincent Martin, Lee William F, Spiropoulou Christina F, Ksiazek Thomas G, Lukwiya Mathew, Kaducu Felix, Downing Robert, Nichol Stuart T
Special Pathogens Branch, Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.
J Virol. 2004 Apr;78(8):4330-41. doi: 10.1128/jvi.78.8.4330-4341.2004.
The largest outbreak on record of Ebola hemorrhagic fever (EHF) occurred in Uganda from August 2000 to January 2001. The outbreak was centered in the Gulu district of northern Uganda, with secondary transmission to other districts. After the initial diagnosis of Sudan ebolavirus by the National Institute for Virology in Johannesburg, South Africa, a temporary diagnostic laboratory was established within the Gulu district at St. Mary's Lacor Hospital. The laboratory used antigen capture and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) to diagnose Sudan ebolavirus infection in suspect patients. The RT-PCR and antigen-capture diagnostic assays proved very effective for detecting ebolavirus in patient serum, plasma, and whole blood. In samples collected very early in the course of infection, the RT-PCR assay could detect ebolavirus 24 to 48 h prior to detection by antigen capture. More than 1,000 blood samples were collected, with multiple samples obtained from many patients throughout the course of infection. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR was used to determine the viral load in multiple samples from patients with fatal and nonfatal cases, and these data were correlated with the disease outcome. RNA copy levels in patients who died averaged 2 log(10) higher than those in patients who survived. Using clinical material from multiple EHF patients, we sequenced the variable region of the glycoprotein. This Sudan ebolavirus strain was not derived from either the earlier Boniface (1976) or Maleo (1979) strain, but it shares a common ancestor with both. Furthermore, both sequence and epidemiologic data are consistent with the outbreak having originated from a single introduction into the human population.
有记录以来最大规模的埃博拉出血热(EHF)疫情于2000年8月至2001年1月在乌干达爆发。疫情集中在乌干达北部的古卢区,并出现了向其他地区的二代传播。在南非约翰内斯堡的国家病毒学研究所初步诊断为苏丹埃博拉病毒后,在古卢区的圣玛丽拉科尔医院设立了一个临时诊断实验室。该实验室采用抗原捕获和逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)来诊断疑似患者的苏丹埃博拉病毒感染。RT-PCR和抗原捕获诊断检测方法在检测患者血清、血浆和全血中的埃博拉病毒方面被证明非常有效。在感染过程极早期采集的样本中,RT-PCR检测方法能比抗原捕获检测提前24至48小时检测到埃博拉病毒。共采集了1000多个血样,在许多患者的整个感染过程中获取了多个样本。采用实时定量RT-PCR来测定致命和非致命病例患者多个样本中的病毒载量,并将这些数据与疾病转归相关联。死亡患者的RNA拷贝水平平均比存活患者高2个对数(10)。利用多名埃博拉出血热患者的临床材料,我们对糖蛋白的可变区进行了测序。这种苏丹埃博拉病毒株并非源自早期的博尼法斯(1976年)株或马莱奥(1979年)株,但它与这两种毒株有共同的祖先。此外,序列和流行病学数据均表明此次疫情源于单次传入人群。